UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report –March 16, 2005

(Date of earliest event reported)

PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

825 Berkshire Blvd., Suite 200, Wyomissing Professional Center, Wyomissing, PA 19610

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Area Code (610) 373-2400

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Check the appropriate box below if the form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 to Form 8-K):

o            Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o            Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 24.14a-12)

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 40.13e-4(c))

Item 8.01                     Other Events.

Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K contains all of the information to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 (including our audited financial statements) except for Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A), and certain information required by Item 9B (Other Information) and Item 15 (Exhibits) of the Form 10-K.  As described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2005, during the course of evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required under the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified certain potential material weaknesses.  We and our independent registered public accounting firm are both in the process of concluding our respective evaluations of the potential deficiencies as well as other aspects of our internal control over financial reporting.  As a result, we filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and Exchange Commission today for a fifteen-day extension of the March 16, 2005 filing deadline for our Form 10-K.

We and our independent registered public accounting firm expect to complete the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting no later than March 31, 2005, at which time we will file a complete Form 10-K that includes the reports of our management and our independent registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting and the information required by Items 9B and 15 of the Form 10-K, as well as the information included in Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.  As of March 15, 2005, our independent registered public accounting firm has informed us that they have not identified any additional potential material weaknesses beyond those previously disclosed in the March 9, 2005 Form 8-K. There can be no assurance that, as a result of the conclusion of the evaluations of internal control over financial reporting, no additional matters will be identified.

Item 9.01                                             Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)                                  Exhibits.

2

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

3

EXHIBIT INDEX

4

Exhibit 99.1

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This document includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements are included throughout the document, including the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and relate to our business strategy, our prospects and our financial position. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include, among others, statements concerning:

•                  our expectations of future results of operations or financial condition;

•                  our expectations for our properties and the facility that we manage in Canada;

•                  the timing, cost and expected impact on our market share and results of operations of our planned capital expenditures;

•                  our expectations with respect to the closing date for the acquisition, integration and results of operations of Argosy Gaming Company;

•                  the impact of our regional diversification;

•                  our expectations with regard to further acquisitions and the integration of any companies we have acquired or may acquire;

•                  the outcome and financial impact of the litigation in which we are involved;

•                  the actions of regulatory, legislative, executive or judicial decisions at the federal, state or local level with regard to our business and the impact of any such actions;

•                  our ability to maintain regulatory approvals for our existing businesses and our ability to receive regulatory approval for our new businesses; and

•                  our expectations of the continued availability and cost of capital resources.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, they are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about our subsidiaries and us, and accordingly, our forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors described below under the heading “Risk Factors” and in the information incorporated by reference herein. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, risks related to the following:

•                  the passage of state, federal or local legislation that would expand, restrict, further tax or prevent gaming operations in the jurisdictions in which we do business;

•                  the activities of our competitors;

•                  increases in our effective rate of taxation at any of our properties or at the corporate level;

•                  successful completion of capital projects at our gaming and pari-mutuel facilities;

•                  the existence of attractive acquisition candidates and the costs and risks involved in the pursuit of those acquisitions;

•                  the maintenance of agreements with our horsemen and pari-mutuel clerks;

•                  our dependence on key personnel; and

•                  the impact of terrorism and other international hostilities.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this document. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document may not occur.

ii

PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

Overview

We are a leading, diversified, multi-jurisdictional owner and operator of gaming properties, as well as horse racetracks and associated off-track wagering facilities, or OTWs, which we collectively refer to in this document as our pari-mutuel operations. The Company was incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1982 as PNRC Corp. and adopted its current name in 1994. In 1997, we began our transition from a pari-mutuel company to a diversified gaming company with the acquisition of the Charles Town property and the introduction of video lottery terminals in West Virginia. We now own or operate nine gaming properties located in Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ontario and West Virginia that are focused primarily on serving customers within driving distance of the properties. We also own one racetrack and six OTWs in Pennsylvania, one racetrack in West Virginia, one racetrack in Maine, and, through a joint venture, own and operate a racetrack in New Jersey. We believe that our portfolio of assets provides us with a diversified cash flow from operations. We intend to continue to expand our gaming operations through the implementation of a disciplined capital expenditure program at our existing properties and the continued pursuit of strategic acquisitions of gaming properties in attractive regional markets.

The following table summarizes certain features of our properties and our managed facility as of March 1, 2005:

(1)                                  Excludes Hollywood Casino Shreveport which is accounted for as discontinued operations.

(2)                                  In addition to our racetrack, Penn National Race Course operates six off-track wagering facilities, located throughout Pennsylvania.

(3)                                  Pursuant to a joint venture with Greenwood New Jersey, Inc., a subsidiary of Greenwood Racing, Inc.

Recent Developments

-          Pending Acquisition of Argosy Gaming Company and Anticipated Acquisition Financing

On November 3, 2004, we announced that our and Argosy Gaming Company’s (“Argosy’s”), boards of directors unanimously approved the Merger Agreement under which we will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Argosy for an all-cash price of $47.00 per share. The transaction is valued at approximately $2.2 billion, including approximately $805 million of long-term debt of Argosy and its subsidiaries. On January 20, 2005, Argosy’s stockholders approved the Merger Agreement.

The Argosy merger is subject to approval by each of our and Argosy’s respective state regulatory bodies, and to certain other necessary regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions contained in the Merger Agreement. As expected, Penn National and Argosy have received a request from the Federal Trade Commission for more information relating to the merger. Based on current staffing issues at the Illinois Gaming Board, the Illinois regulatory environment may pose some delays.

If the Argosy merger is consummated, the combined company would be the third largest operator of gaming properties in the U.S. with annual revenue in excess of $2 billion, over 20,000 slot machines, and approximately 700,000 square feet of gaming space. Upon completion of the Argosy merger, and reflecting previously announced divestitures, acquisitions and projects under development, we would own thirteen gaming facilities, four pari-mutuel horse racing facilities, six off-track wagering sites and a 50% interest in a fifth pari-mutuel horse racing facility, and hold a management contract for a casino in Canada. Argosy owns and operates casinos and related entertainment and hotel facilities in the midwestern and southern U.S.: the Alton Belle Casino in Alton, Illinois, serving the St. Louis metropolitan market; the Argosy Casino-Riverside in Missouri, serving the greater Kansas City metropolitan market; the Argosy Casino-Baton Rouge in Louisiana; the Argosy Casino-Sioux City in Iowa; the Argosy Casino-Lawrenceburg in Indiana, serving the Cincinnati and Dayton metropolitan markets; and the Empress Casino Joliet in Illinois serving the greater Chicagoland market.

-  Anticipated Financing for Argosy Acquisition

Concurrently with the closing of the Argosy merger we plan to enter into new senior secured credit facilities upon terms and conditions to be negotiated. We have received commitments from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. to provide up to $2.725 billion of senior secured credit facilities (which we may elect to increase to up to $3.025 billion as described below) to finance the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, refinance certain of our and Argosy’s indebtedness and pay certain fees and expenses in connection therewith. It is contemplated that such senior secured credit facilities would be comprised of a $750.0 million revolving credit facility, up to a $325.0 million term loan A facility and up to a $1.65 billion term loan B facility. During the first three years of the term of the senior secured credit facilities, we may elect to increase the senior secured credit facilities by up to $300.0 million in the aggregate, subject to some limitations; provided that any increase in commitments under the new revolving credit facility cannot exceed $100 million. The senior secured credit facilities are to be guaranteed by substantially all domestic subsidiaries of Penn National and Argosy and secured by substantially all of our, Argosy’s, and such guarantors’ assets, in each case except to the extent prohibited by relevant gaming authorities after we have used commercially reasonable efforts to arrange for such guarantees or collateral or as otherwise excluded. Material conditions to funding include, without limitation, absence of a material adverse change at Argosy, refinancing of Argosy’s existing indebtedness and our existing senior secured credit facility, receipt of necessary regulatory approvals and consummation of the Argosy merger in compliance in all material respects with the Merger Agreement.

-  Penn National Race Course

We continue to develop and refine our design proposal for a completely new gaming and racing facility at Penn National Race Course to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by Pennsylvania’s new slot machine legislation. On July 5, 2004 Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell signed into law the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act. Subsequently, the members of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board were named. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board held its fourth meeting in March 2005, and is currently focused on staffing so that it may develop the regulatory, application, licensing and approval processes. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board does not expect to issue operator licenses prior to December, 2005. The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue has selected GTECH Corporation to supply a central control computer system to monitor slot

2

machine gaming in Pennsylvania. The new law is the subject of a lawsuit which challenges the validity of the law on various constitutional grounds. Certain dispositive motions relative to this challenge were argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on March 9, 2005. We expect to open the new slots facility within approximately one year after receiving a license.

-  Pocono Downs Sale

On January 25, 2005, we completed the sale of The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries to the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (“MTGA”) for approximately $280 million. Reflecting taxes, post closing adjustments, fees and other expenses, we realized net cash proceeds of approximately $170.6 million, which we intend to apply to a combination of debt reduction and previously announced development projects.

Under the terms of the agreement, MTGA acquired The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries including Pocono Downs (a standardbred horse racing facility located on approximately 400 acres in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania) and five Pennsylvania OTW facilities located in Carbondale, East Stroudsburg, Erie, Hazleton and the Lehigh Valley (Allentown). The agreement also provides MTGA with certain post-closing termination rights in the event of certain materially adverse legislative or regulatory events. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the transaction will not be recorded as a sale until the post-closing termination rights have expired.

We have reflected the results of this transaction by classifying the assets, liabilities and results of operations of The Downs Racing, Inc. as assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” A gain or loss on this transaction has not been recorded or recognized at this time since the sale has not yet been deemed completed. Financial information for The Downs Racing, Inc. was previously reported as part of the racing reporting segment.

-  Bangor Historic Track

The Maine Harness Racing Commission has granted us an unconditional racing license for Bangor Historic Track, Inc. for the 2004 and 2005 racing seasons. The annual license represents the first regulatory approval necessary for us to proceed with our proposed $74 million development project at the track including the construction of Maine’s first and presently only gaming facility where we intend to place up to 1,500 slot machines. In October, we also submitted our licensing application to the Maine Gambling Control Board for a slot operator’s license. On November 4, 2004, the Maine Gambling Control Board granted us a conditional slot operator license. The license is conditioned on us not commencing gaming operations while the Board and the Department of Public Safety pursue legislation to protect confidential corporate and personal information in the same manner as other U.S. gaming and racing jurisdictions, and until we have submitted such information to the Board after passage of such legislation by the legislature and subsequent gubernatorial execution. On February 9, 2005, the Joint Standing Committee on Legal and Veterans Affairs voted to pass a form of such legislation. Pending passage of the legislation by the full legislature, subsequent execution by the Governor and appropriate implementation by the Maine Gaming Control Board, we intend to continue to move forward with developing our plans for construction of a state-of-the-art racing and gaming facility in Bangor.

-  Stock Split

On February 3, 2005 the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of the Company’s common stock. The stock split was in the form of a stock dividend of one additional share of the Company’s common stock for each share held. The additional shares were distributed on March 7, 2005 to shareholders of record on February 14, 2005. As a result of the stock dividend, the number of outstanding shares of our common stock increased to approximately 82.8 million. All

3

references in the financial statements to number of shares and net income per share amounts of our common stock have been restated to reflect the increased number of common stock shares outstanding.

-  Redemption of 11¹¤₈% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008; Issuance of 6³¤₄% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015

On February 8, 2005, we called for redemption all of the $200 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 11¹¤₈% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 1, 2008, in accordance with the related indenture. The redemption price was $1,055.63 per $1,000 principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and payment was made on March 10, 2005.

On March 9, 2005, we completed an offering of $250 million of 6³¤₄% senior subordinated notes due 2015. Interest on the notes is payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2005. These notes mature on March 1, 2015. We used the net proceeds from this offering to redeem the $200 million 11¹¤₈% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 1, 2008 and repay a portion of the term loan indebtedness under our current senior secured credit facility. The 6³¤₄% notes are general unsecured obligations and are not guaranteed by our subsidiaries.

-  Hollywood Casino Shreveport Bankruptcy and Disposition

On August 27, 2004, our unrestricted subsidiary, Hollywood Casino Shreveport, or HCS, in cooperation with an Ad Hoc Committee representing a majority of its noteholders, entered into an agreement with Eldorado Resorts LLC (“Eldorado”) providing for acquisition of HCS by certain affiliates of Eldorado (“Eldorado Transaction”). On October 28, 2004, HCS filed a joint plan and disclosure statement that incorporates the Eldorado Transaction. On September 10, 2004, a group of creditors led by Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case against HCS. On October 30, 2004, HCS agreed to the entry of an order for relief in the Chapter 11 case that has been filed against it, and HCS I, Inc., HCS II, Inc., HWCC-Louisiana, Inc. and Shreveport Capital Corporation commenced voluntary cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

HCS filed a revised reorganization plan and disclosure statement with the Bankruptcy Court on March 3, 2005. The plan continues to provide for the acquisition of the hotel and casino by Eldorado under the agreement announced last year. The Official Bondholder Committee in the Chapter 11 case has joined HCS as a proponent of the plan. The Bankruptcy Court has set a hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement for April 11, 2005. Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and KOAR International (Paul Alanis) continue to express interest in acquiring the hotel and casino and have asked the Bankruptcy Court for permission to file their own competing plan. HCS intends to oppose that request.

We have reflected the results of this transaction by classifying the assets, liabilities and results of operations of Hollywood Casino Shreveport as assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” A gain or loss on this transaction has not been recorded or recognized at this time since the sale has not yet been completed and is subject to various approvals. Financial information for Hollywood Casino Shreveport was previously reported as part of our gaming reporting segment.

Owned Gaming Properties

Charles Town Entertainment Complex

The Charles Town Entertainment Complex in Charles Town, West Virginia was our most profitable property in 2004. The Charles Town Entertainment Complex features approximately 3,793 gaming machines (up from 3,500 in 2003), live thoroughbred racing, simulcast wagering and dining. The facility is located within approximately a one-hour drive from Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, D.C. and

4

is the only gaming property located conveniently west of these two cities. The complex is located on a portion of a 250-acre parcel and includes a newly refurbished ³¤₄-mile all-weather, lighted thoroughbred racetrack with a 3,000-person grandstand.

We have undertaken a number of initiatives that will continue to drive growth at Charles Town. In 2004, we increased customer parking by expanding our parking garage and adding 1,050 spaces, converted 899 slot machines to ticket-in-ticket-out format to provide better customer service and added 300 slot machines to our floor count. In 2005, we plan to add another 200 machines to our gaming floor and continue to convert our machines to the ticket-in-ticket-out format.

Hollywood Casino Aurora

Hollywood Casino Aurora is located in Aurora, Illinois, the third largest city in Illinois, approximately 35 miles west of Chicago. The facility is easily accessible from major highways, can be reached by train from downtown Chicago, and is approximately 30 miles from both the O’Hare International and Midway airports. The principal target markets are Chicago and the surrounding northern and western suburbs.

Hollywood Casino Aurora has 53,000 square feet of gaming space at a single-level dockside casino facility with 22 gaming tables and 1,161 gaming machines. The facility features a glass-domed, four-story atrium with two upscale lounges, the award-winning Fairbanks® gourmet steakhouse, the Hollywood Epic Buffet®, a high-end customer lounge and a private dining room for premium players. Hollywood Casino Aurora also has two parking garages with approximately 1,564 parking spaces. In addition, Hollywood Casino Aurora has retail items at the Hollywood Casino Studio Store®, a highly themed shopping facility that offers movies on video, soundtrack compact discs and logo merchandise from major Hollywood studios.

Casino Rouge

Casino Rouge is currently one of two dockside riverboat gaming facilities operating in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The property features a four-story, 47,000-square foot riverboat casino, reminiscent of a nineteenth century Mississippi River paddlewheel steamboat, and a two-story, 58,000-square foot dockside embarkation building. The riverboat features approximately 28,000 square feet of gaming space, 1,065 gaming machines, 31 table games, and a deli. In early 2005, we plan to complete the renovation of the riverboat’s interior decor. The dockside embarkation facility offers a variety of amenities, including a steakhouse, a 268-seat buffet, a snack bar, a premium players’ lounge, a public lounge area that includes a band stage and dance floor, meeting and planning space and a gift shop.

Casino Magic—Bay St. Louis

Casino Magic—Bay St. Louis currently offers 39,500 square feet of gaming space, with 1,204 slot machines and 30 table games. Casino Magic—Bay St. Louis is located on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, within driving distance of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mobile, Alabama and other cities in the Southeast. We were the first dockside casino in Mississippi to operate on a barge rather than a traditional riverboat. The casino is located on a 17-acre marina with the adjoining land-based facilities situated on 591 acres. The property includes the 292-room Bay Tower Hotel, the 202-room Casino Magic Inn, banquet and meeting space, a 10,000 square foot conference facility, an 1,800-seat entertainment facility, an 18-hole Arnold Palmer-designed championship golf course, five restaurant venues and a live entertainment lounge. There remains ample room for expansion, to the extent the market grows.

Hollywood Casino Tunica

Hollywood Casino Tunica is located in Tunica, Mississippi. Tunica County is the closest gaming jurisdiction to, and is easily accessible from, the Memphis, Tennessee metropolitan area. The Tunica market has become a regional destination resort, attracting customers from surrounding markets such

5

as Nashville, Tennessee, Atlanta, Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Little Rock, Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Hollywood Casino Tunica features 54,000 square feet of gaming space at a single-level casino with approximately 1,620 slot machines and 31 table games. Hollywood Casino Tunica’s 492-room hotel and 123-space recreational vehicle park provide overnight accommodations for its patrons.

The casino includes the highly-themed Adventure Slots® gaming area, featuring multimedia displays of memorabilia from famous adventure motion pictures and over 200 slot machines. Additional entertainment amenities include the award-winning Fairbanks gourmet steakhouse, the Hollywood Epic Buffet, a 1950’s-style diner named the Hollywood Diner, an entertainment lounge, a premium players’ club, a themed bar facility, an indoor pool and showroom as well as banquet and meeting facilities. There is also an 18-hole championship golf course adjacent to the facility that is owned and operated through a joint venture with Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. and Boyd Gaming. In addition, Hollywood Casino Tunica offers parking for 1,635 cars.

Boomtown Biloxi

Boomtown Biloxi, also located in the Mississippi Gulf Coast, offers 33,600 square feet of gaming space, with 1,100 slot machines and 21 table games. In addition, the property includes a full service buffet restaurant, a 125-seat menu-service restaurant, a full-service bakery, an ice cream parlor, a western cabaret and a 20,000-square foot family entertainment center.

Boomtown Biloxi offers gaming and entertainment amenities to primarily local, middle-income customers and tourists. The casino has an “old west” theme with western memorabilia, country/western music and employees dressed in western attire. Our strategy is to continue to focus on this market by providing moderately priced, quality amenities and by utilizing a broad array of marketing programs.

Bullwhackers

The Bullwhackers properties include the Bullwhackers Casino, the adjoining Bullpen Sports Casino and the Silver Hawk Saloon and Casino. The Bullwhackers properties include 20,700 square feet of gaming space consisting of 910 slot machines. These casinos are located on leased land and 3.75 acres of owned land, most of which is utilized for a 340-car parking area.

Hollywood Casino Shreveport

Hollywood Casino Shreveport is located in Shreveport, Louisiana, and is 190 miles east of Dallas, Texas. The principal target markets for Hollywood Casino Shreveport are Dallas, Fort Worth and other communities in East Texas. We lease approximately nine acres of land in Shreveport, Louisiana. The Hollywood Casino Shreveport resort consists of a 403-room, all suites, art deco-style hotel, and a three-level riverboat dockside casino. The casino contains approximately 59,000 square feet of space with approximately 1,434 slot machines and 71 table games. The centerpiece of the resort is a 170,000 square foot land-based pavilion housing numerous restaurants and entertainment amenities. Hollywood Casino Shreveport competes directly with five casinos and a racetrack in the Shreveport market.

On August 27, 2004, our unrestricted subsidiary, Hollywood Casino Shreveport, in cooperation with an Ad Hoc Committee representing a majority of its noteholders, entered into an agreement with Eldorado providing for acquisition of Hollywood Casino Shreveport by certain affiliates of Eldorado. On September 10, 2004, a group of creditors led by Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case against HCS. On October 28, 2004, Hollywood Casino Shreveport filed a joint plan and disclosure statement that incorporates the Eldorado transaction. On October 30, 2004, Hollywood Casino Shreveport agreed to the entry of an order for relief in the Chapter 11 case that has been filed against it and HCS I, Inc., HCS II, Inc., HWCC-Louisiana, Inc. and Shreveport Capital Corporation commenced voluntary cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Based on this

6

transaction, the financial results of Hollywood Casino Shreveport are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. (See the discussion of discontinued operations in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”)

Operated Gaming Property

Casino Rama

Through CHC Casinos Canada Limited, or CHC Casinos, our indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, we operate Casino Rama, a full service gaming and entertainment facility, on behalf of the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, an agency of the Province of Ontario. Casino Rama was established in July 1996 and is located on the lands of the Mnjikaning First Nation, approximately 90 miles north of Toronto. The property has approximately 92,000 square feet of gaming space, 2,300 gaming machines and 121 table games. A 5,000-seat entertainment facility was opened in July 2001 and a 300-room hotel was opened on June 30, 2002. The majority of the capital for this expansion was financed by an affiliate of the Mnjikaning First Nation, and is projected to be repaid out of the revenue of Casino Rama pursuant to the terms of the management contract. We were not required to commit any capital to these projects.

The Development and Operating Agreement under which CHC Casinos operates the facility, which we refer to as the management contract for Casino Rama, sets out the duties, rights and obligations of CHC Casinos. As the operator, CHC Casinos is entitled to a base fee equal to 2.0% of gross revenues of the casino and an incentive fee equal to 5.0% of the casino’s net operating profit. The agreement terminates on July 31, 2011, and the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation has the option to extend the term of the agreement and CHC Casinos’ appointment as operator for two successive periods of five years each commencing on August 1, 2011.

Racing Properties

Racing Property Overview

In addition to our gaming assets, including the Charles Town Entertainment Complex which owns and operates a thoroughbred racetrack, we own and operate Penn National Race Course and six OTWs in Pennsylvania, Bangor Raceway in Maine and, through our joint venture, Freehold Raceway in New Jersey.

Penn National Race Course is located on approximately 225 acres and is 15 miles northeast of Harrisburg, 100 miles west of Philadelphia and 200 miles east of Pittsburgh. Penn National is one of only two thoroughbred racetracks in Pennsylvania. The property includes a one-mile all-weather, lighted thoroughbred racetrack, a ⁷¤₈-mile turf track, a grandstand and a clubhouse. The property also includes approximately 400 acres that are available for future expansion or development.

Our OTWs and racetracks provide areas for viewing import simulcast races of thoroughbred and harness horse racing, televised sporting events, placing pari-mutuel wagers and dining. We operate six of the twenty-one OTWs in operation in Pennsylvania; two remaining OTWs are authorized for operation. Only licensed racing associations can operate OTWs or accept customer wagers on simulcast races. We have been transmitting simulcasts of our races to other OTWs, thoroughbred and harness horse racing tracks, and greyhound dog race tracks, throughout the United States, and receiving simulcasts of races from other thoroughbred and harness horse racing tracks for wagering by customers at our OTW locations and our horse race track facilities, year-round, for more than eleven years. Import simulcasts typically include races from premier horse racetracks such as Belmont Park, Churchill Downs, Gulfstream Park, Hollywood Park, Santa Anita and Saratoga.

Bangor Raceway is located at historic Bass Park in downtown Bangor, Maine. Harness racing has been conducted continuously at Bass Park since 1893 and it was once part of racing’s Grand Circuit during the Roaring Twenties. Today Bangor hosts 27 days of harness racing during mid-summer on its

7

one-half mile track. With over 12,000 square feet of space, the facility can seat 3,500 patrons and features a restaurant and cocktail lounge.

Through our joint venture, we own a 51-acre site in Freehold in Western Monmouth County, New Jersey where Freehold Raceway in located. The property features a half-mile oval harness track and a 150,000 square foot grandstand.

Telephone Account Wagering/Internet Wagering

In 1983, we pioneered Telebet®, the complete account wagering operation for Penn National Race Course. The platform offers account wagering on more than 70 U.S. racetracks, and currently has more than 8,900 active telephone account betting customers from the 17 states that permit account wagering.

We have also developed strategic relationships to further our wagering activities. In August 1999, we entered into an agreement with eBet Limited, an Internet wagering operation in Australia, to license their eBetUSA.com technology in the U.S. Through eBetUSA.com, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, we use the eBetUSA.com technology to permit on-line pari-mutuel horseracing wagering over the internet in selected jurisdictions with the approval of the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission and as permitted by applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations. We currently accept wagers from residents of 17 U.S. jurisdictions.

Trademarks

We own a number of trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or U.S. PTO, including but not limited to, “Telebet,” “World Series of Handicapping,” and “Players’ Choice.” We also have a number of trademark applications pending with the U.S. PTO.

BSL, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary entered into a License Agreement with Casino Magic Corp. dated August 8, 2000 pursuant to which it uses “Casino Magic” and other trademarks.

BTN, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a License Agreement with Boomtown, Inc. dated August 8, 2000 pursuant to which it uses “Boomtown” and other trademarks.

As a result of our acquisition of Hollywood Casino Corporation, we own the service mark “Hollywood Casino” which is registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have been informed that our rights to the “Hollywood Casino” service mark are well established and have significant competitive value to the Hollywood casino properties. We have also acquired other trademarks used by the Hollywood Casino facilities and their related services. These marks are either registered or are the subject of pending applications with the U.S. PTO.

Competition

-  Gaming Operations

The gaming industry is characterized by a high degree of competition among a large number of participants, many of which have financial and other resources that are greater than our resources. Competitive gaming activities include casinos, video lottery terminals and other forms of legalized gaming in the U.S. and other jurisdictions.

Legalized gambling is currently permitted in various forms throughout the U.S. and in several Canadian provinces. Other jurisdictions may legalize gaming in the near future. In addition, established gaming jurisdictions could award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion of existing gaming operations. New or expanded operations by other persons will increase competition for our gaming operations and could have a material adverse impact on us.

Charles Town, West Virginia.  Our gaming machine operations at the Charles Town Entertainment Complex face competition from other gaming machine venues in West Virginia and in neighboring

8

states (including, but not limited to, Dover Downs, Delaware Park and Harrington Raceway in Delaware and the casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey). The venues in these neighboring states are permitted to offer significantly higher stakes for their gaming machines than are permitted in West Virginia. Atlantic City, New Jersey does not have a per-pull limit on its gaming machines, while Delaware has a $25 per-pull limit. The per-pull limit in West Virginia is currently $5 per gaming machine. In addition, Maryland is currently considering legislation permitting slot machines and Pennsylvania has recently passed legislation permitting slot machines at various locations. The failure to attract or retain gaming machine customers at the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, whether arising from such competition or from other factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The West Virginia Legislature is currently considering a bill to allow counties to determine, by local election, whether to permit certain table games at racetracks in the state.

Aurora, Illinois.  Aurora is part of the Chicago-area market that includes properties in the Chicago suburbs in both Illinois and northern Indiana. Hollywood Casino Aurora faces competition from eight other riverboat casinos in the Chicago-area market, three dockside casinos that are located in Illinois and five dockside casinos that are located in Indiana. Due to the significantly higher gaming taxes imposed on Illinois riverboats in 2002 and 2003, the Indiana riverboats are generally able to spend greater amounts on marketing and other amenities, which has significantly increased their ability to compete with the Illinois riverboats.

New competition in the region is currently limited by state legislation. The Illinois Riverboat Gambling Act and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Gaming Board under the Riverboat Gambling Act authorize only ten owners’ licenses for riverboat gaming operations in Illinois and permit a maximum of 1,200 gaming positions at any time for each of the ten licensed sites. All authorized owners’ licenses have been granted; however, one of the licenses is dormant due to a pending bankruptcy proceeding and ongoing dispute among the investors in such license, their host city, the Illinois Gaming Board and Illinois government. Illinois is currently seeking to sell this tenth license. In the event that these disputes are fully resolved and a sale is consummated, this license will likely become operational. We may face additional competition if such a licensee were to open a gaming facility near Hollywood Casino Aurora.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana.  Casino Rouge faces competition from land-based and riverboat casinos throughout Louisiana and on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, casinos on Native American lands and from non-casino gaming opportunities within Louisiana. The principal competitor to Casino Rouge is the Argosy Casino, which is the only other licensed riverboat casino in Baton Rouge. We also face competition from three major riverboat casinos, one land-based casino in the New Orleans area, which is approximately 75 miles from Baton Rouge, and three Native American casinos in Louisiana. The two closest Native American casinos are land-based facilities located approximately 45 miles southwest and approximately 65 miles northwest of Baton Rouge. In addition, we face competition from a racetrack located approximately 55 miles from Baton Rouge that began operating approximately 1,500 gaming machines in December 2003. We also face competition from the truck stop gaming facilities located in certain surrounding parishes, each of which are authorized to operate up to 50 video poker machines.

9

Mississippi Gulf Coast.  Our Mississippi Gulf Coast casino operations, Boomtown Biloxi and Casino Magic-Bay St. Louis, face intense competition. Dockside gaming has grown rapidly on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, increasing from no dockside casinos in March 1992 to twelve operating dockside casinos on December 31, 2004. Nine of these facilities are located in Biloxi, two are located in Gulfport and one is located in Bay St. Louis. In addition, the Mississippi Gaming Control Act does not limit the number of licenses that may be granted and there are a number of additional sites located in the Gulf Coast region that are in various stages of development. Any significant increase in the competition in the region could negatively impact our existing operations.

Tunica County, Mississippi.  Hollywood Casino Tunica faces intense competition from nine other casinos operating in north Tunica County and Coahoma County. The Tunica County market is segregated into two casino clusters, Casino Center and Casino Strip, where Hollywood Casino Tunica is located, as well as three stand-alone properties. A shuttle service provides transportation between the various Tunica County casinos. In addition, we compete with another casino located approximately 40 miles south of the Casino Strip cluster in Coahoma County. The close proximity of the casinos in Tunica County has contributed to the competition between casinos because it allows consumers to visit a variety of casinos in a short period of time. The Mississippi Gaming Control Act does not limit the number of licenses that may be granted. Any significant increase in new competition in or around Tunica County could negatively impact the operations of Hollywood Casino Tunica.

Hollywood Casino Tunica also competes to some extent with a land-based casino complex operated by the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians in central Mississippi, approximately 200 miles south and east of Memphis, TN. In addition, Hollywood Casino Tunica may eventually face competition from the opening of gaming casinos closer to Memphis, such as in DeSoto County, Mississippi, which is the only county between Tunica County and the Tennessee border. DeSoto County has defeated gaming proposals on three separate occasions, most recently in November 1996. Casino gaming is not currently legalized in Tennessee or Arkansas; however, the legalization of gaming in either Tennessee or Arkansas could have a material adverse impact on Hollywood Casino Tunica.

Black Hawk, Colorado.  The Black Hawk gaming market is characterized by intense competition. The primary competitive factors in the market are location, availability and convenience of parking, number of slot machines and gaming tables, promotional incentives, types and pricing of non-gaming amenities, name recognition and overall atmosphere. There are currently 21 gaming facilities in the Black Hawk market and six gaming facilities in nearby Central City. Central City and Black Hawk gaming facilities compete for visitors, but historically, Black Hawk has enjoyed an advantage over Central City because customers have to drive through Black Hawk to reach Central City. During 2004 Central City completed construction of and opened a road directly connecting Central City and Black Hawk with Interstate 70, which allows customers to reach Central City without driving through Black Hawk.

Ontario.  Our operation of Casino Rama through CHC Casinos Canada Limited faces competition in Ontario from three other commercial casinos, six charity casinos and at least 16 racetracks with gaming machines in the province. All of the casinos (including Casino Rama) and gaming machine facilities are operated by or on behalf of the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, an agency of the Province of Ontario. The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation also operates several province-wide lotteries.

There are two charity casinos and five racetracks with gaming machine facilities that directly affect Casino Rama. The two charity casinos together have 105 gaming tables and 902 gaming machines. The number of gaming machines at the racetracks ranges from 100 to over 1,700 each. There is a permanent casino located in Niagara Falls, Ontario, 80 miles southwest of Toronto that opened in June 2004 with 151 gaming tables and 2,986 gaming machines.

10

-  Racing and pari-mutuel operations

Our racing and pari-mutuel operations face significant competition for wagering dollars from other racetracks and OTWs, some of which also offer other forms of gaming, as well as other gaming venues such as casinos and state-sponsored lotteries, including the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and West Virginia lotteries. Our telephone account and internet wagering operations compete with other providers of such services throughout the country. We also may face competition in the future from new OTWs, new racetracks or new providers of telephone account or internet wagering. From time to time, states consider legislation to permit other forms of gaming. If additional gaming opportunities become available near our racing and pari-mutuel operations, such gaming opportunities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

U.S. and Foreign Revenues

Our revenues from continuing operations in the U.S. for 2002, 2003 and 2004 were approximately $618.9 million, $1,013.0 million and $1,140.7 million, respectively. Our revenues from operations in Canada for 2002, 2003 and 2004 were approximately $11.5 million, $13.7 million and $16.3 million, respectively. We currently do not derive revenue from any countries other than the U.S. and Canada.

Segments

We operate in two segments, gaming and racing. For financial data about our segments for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, please see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Management

Peter M. Carlino.  Mr. Carlino has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since April 1994. From 1984 to 1994, he devoted a substantial portion of his time to developing, building and operating residential and commercial real estate projects located primarily in central Pennsylvania. Since 1976, Mr. Carlino has been President of Carlino Financial Corporation, a holding company that owns and operates various Carlino family businesses, in which capacity he has been continuously active in strategic planning for Carlino Financial Corporation and monitoring its operations.

Kevin G. DeSanctis.  Mr. DeSanctis joined us in February 2001 as our President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. DeSanctis served as Chief Operating Officer, North America, for Sun International Hotels Limited where he was responsible for complete oversight of day-to-day operations of the company’s gaming properties in North America and the Bahamas. Prior to joining Sun International, Mr. DeSanctis’ experience included management and pre-opening responsibilities for gaming operations in Las Vegas, Nevada, Atlantic City, New Jersey, New Orleans, Louisiana and Colorado.

Leonard M. DeAngelo.  Mr. DeAngelo joined us in July 2003 as Executive Vice President of Operations. From, December 2000 to July 2003, Mr. DeAngelo served as President of the Atlantic City

11

Hilton Casino Resort. Prior to being named President of the Atlantic City Hilton, Mr. DeAngelo served for three years as Corporate Senior Vice President of Casino Marketing with Sun International where, in addition to his marketing responsibilities, he also oversaw information technology initiatives relating to the casinos, including operations, marketing, data warehousing and online projects. From November 1995 to December 1997, Mr. DeAngelo was President of the Sands Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City. He served with the Sands in other executive positions beginning in 1983, holding the titles of Director of Casino Administration, Vice President Casino Administration and Senior Vice President before being named President. He began his career in the gaming and hotel industry in 1979 at Bally’s Park Place Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City.

William J. Clifford.  Mr. Clifford joined us in August 2001 and was appointed to his current position as Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer in October 2001. From March 1997 to July 2001, Mr. Clifford served as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance with Sun International Resorts, Inc., Paradise Island, Bahamas. From November 1993 to February 1997, Mr. Clifford was Financial, Hotel and Operations Controller for Treasure Island Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. From May 1989 to November 1993, Mr. Clifford was Controller for Golden Nugget Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas. Prior to May 1989, Mr. Clifford held the positions of Controller for the Dunes Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas, Property Operations Analyst with Aladdin Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas, Casino Administrator with Las Vegas Hilton, Las Vegas, Senior Internal Auditor with Del Webb, Las Vegas, and Agent, Audit Division, of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, Las Vegas and Reno.

Robert S. Ippolito.  In July 2001, we appointed Mr. Ippolito to the position of Vice President. Mr. Ippolito has served as our Secretary and Treasurer since April 1994 and as our Chief Financial Officer from April 1994 until July 2001. Mr. Ippolito brings more than 21 years of gaming and racing experience to the management team both as a manager at a major accounting firm and as an officer of companies in the racing business.

Jordan B. Savitch.  Mr. Savitch joined us in September 2002 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel. From June 1999 to April 2002, Mr. Savitch served as a director and senior executive at iMedium, Inc., a venture-backed software company offering innovative software solutions for increasing sales effectiveness. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Savitch served as senior corporate counsel at Safeguard Scientifics, Inc., a NYSE-listed company specializing in identifying, developing and operating emerging technology companies. Mr. Savitch also spent four years in private practice as an associate at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, LLP in New York, New York.

Governmental Regulations

The gaming and racing industry are highly regulated, and we must maintain our licenses and pay gaming taxes to continue our operations. Each of our facilities is subject to extensive regulation under the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction where it is located. These laws, rules and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial stability and character of the owners, managers, and persons with financial interests in the gaming operations. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in other jurisdictions. A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject will be included as Exhibit 99.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted.

12

Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.

Employees and Labor Relations

As of March 7, 2005, we had 12,126 full- and part-time employees.

We are required to have agreements with the horsemen at each of our racetracks to conduct our live racing and simulcasting activities. In addition, in order to operate gaming machines in West Virginia, we must maintain agreements with each of the Charles Town horsemen, pari-mutuel clerks and breeders.

At the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, we have an agreement with the Charles Town horsemen that expires on December 31, 2007 and an agreement with the breeders that expires on June 30, 2005. The pari-mutuel clerks at Charles Town are represented under a collective bargaining agreement with the West Virginia Division of Mutuel Clerks which expires on March 31, 2005. We are in active discussions with the pari-mutuel clerks at Charles Town regarding a new agreement or an extension of the existing agreement, however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into a new agreement or an extension of the existing agreement on satisfactory terms or at all.

Our agreement with the Pennsylvania thoroughbred horsemen at Penn National Race Course expires on September 30, 2011. We have an agreement with Local 137 at Penn National Race Course with respect to pari-mutuel clerks and admissions and Telebet personnel that expires on December 31, 2007. We also have an agreement in place with the Sports Arena Employees Local 137 (AFL-CIO) with respect to pari-mutuel clerks and admission personnel at our OTWs. That agreement expires on September 30, 2005.

Pennwood Racing also has an agreement in effect with the horsemen at Freehold Raceway which expires in May, 2006.

Risks Related to Our Business

A substantial portion of our revenues and income from operations is derived from our Charles Town, West Virginia and Aurora, Illinois facilities.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, approximately 35.1% and 44.9% of our net revenue and income from operations, respectively, were derived from our Charles Town operations, and approximately 20.4% and 27.8% of our net revenue and income from operations, respectively, were derived from our Aurora operations. We expect that a substantial portion of our revenues and income from operations for the immediate future will be derived from our Charles Town and Aurora facilities. Our ability to meet our operating and debt service requirements is substantially dependent upon the continued success of these facilities. The operations at these facilities could be adversely affected by numerous factors including:

•                  risks related to local and regional economic and competitive conditions, such as a decline in the number of visitors to the facility, a downturn in the overall economy in the market, a decrease in gaming activities in the market or an increase in competition;

•                  changes in local and state governmental laws and regulations (including changes in laws and regulations affecting gaming operations and taxes) applicable to a facility;

•                  impeded access to the facility due to weather, road construction or closures of primary access routes; and

•                  the occurrence of floods and other natural disasters.

If any of these events occurs, our operating revenues and cash flow could decline significantly. For example, in July 2003, the State of Illinois increased certain tax rates and added new tax brackets for

13

gaming licensees. We have taken steps to mitigate the Illinois tax increase through a variety of methods including employee reduction, marketing and promotional programs reductions, other cost reductions and the adoption of admission fees. While these steps have been beneficial to us, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully mitigate the tax increase.

We may face disruption in integrating and managing the Argosy operations and any facilities we may acquire in the future.

On November 3, 2004, we entered into a Merger Agreement pursuant to which we intend to acquire Argosy Gaming Company. In addition, we expect to continue pursuing expansion and acquisition opportunities, and we regularly evaluate opportunities for acquisition of other properties, which evaluations may include discussions and the review of confidential information after the execution of nondisclosure agreements with potential acquisition candidates, some potentially significant in relation to our size.

We could face significant challenges in managing and integrating the expanded or combined operations of Penn National and Argosy and any other properties we may acquire. The integration of the Argosy operations and any other properties we may acquire will require the dedication of management resources that may temporarily divert attention from our day-to-day business. The process of integrating Argosy, and other properties we may acquire, also may interrupt the activities of those businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure you that the Argosy merger or the acquisition of any other properties will be completed or that Argosy or any other properties will be integrated successfully.

Management of new properties, especially in new geographic areas, may require that we increase our managerial resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage the combined operations effectively or realize any of the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions. We also cannot assure you that if the Argosy merger or any other acquisitions are completed, that Argosy or any other acquired businesses will generate sufficient revenue to offset the associated costs or other adverse effects.

Our ability to achieve our objectives in connection with any acquisition we may consummate may be highly dependent on, among other things, our ability to retain the senior level property management teams of such acquisition candidates. If, for any reason, we are unable to retain these management teams following such acquisitions or if we fail to attract new capable executives, our operations after consummation of such acquisitions could be materially adversely affected.

The occurrence of some or all of the above described events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We face the risks that we may not consummate the Argosy merger.

We cannot assure you that the Argosy merger will be consummated on the terms described herein, at a date certain or at all. The completion of the Argosy merger is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including receiving the various federal, state and local regulatory approvals, which may or may not occur. If we do not consummate the Argosy merger, then we will not receive the expected benefits of such merger.

In addition, we have incurred and will continue to incur substantial costs in connection with the proposed Argosy merger. These costs are primarily associated with the fees of attorneys, accountants and our financial advisors. We have also diverted significant management resources in an effort to complete the merger. If the merger is not completed, we will have incurred significant costs, including the diversion of management resources, for which we will have received little or no benefit, which could negatively impact our financial results and operations.

Because of the complex conditions which must be satisfied in order to complete acquisitions in the gaming industry and the regulatory approvals required in connection with such acquisitions, our

14

planned acquisition of Argosy, as well as our involvement in potential acquisitions in the future, may result in uncapitalized expenses, non-recurring charges, litigation, substantial obligations and a substantial risk of loss.

If we consummate the Argosy merger then we will be subject to additional risks, including, without limitation, all of the business, financial, operational, environmental, competitive, regulatory, economic and other risks related to Argosy and its properties and operations that are included in Argosy’s filings with the SEC. In addition, the risks that our current operations face may increase or intensify. Information concerning Argosy is publicly available via the SEC’s website and EDGAR system. None of Argosy’s public information has been incorporated by reference herein and we do not make any representations with respect to, or assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in, any filings by Argosy with the SEC.

We face risks related to the development and expansion of our current properties.

We expect to use a portion of our cash on hand, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility for significant capital expenditures at certain of our properties. Any proposed enhancement may require us to significantly increase the size of our existing work force at those properties. We cannot be certain that management will be able to hire and retain a sufficient number of employees to operate and manage these facilities at their optimal levels. The failure to employ the necessary work force could adversely affect our operations and ultimately harm profitability. In addition, these enhancements could involve risks similar to construction risks including cost over-runs, delays, market deterioration and receipt of required licenses, permits or authorizations, among others. Our failure to complete any new development or expansion project as planned, on schedule, within budget or in a manner that generates anticipated profits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face a number of challenges prior to opening new gaming facilities.

No assurance can be given that the expected timetable for opening new gaming facilities will be met in light of the uncertainties inherent in the development of the regulatory framework, the licensing process, legislative action and litigation.

We face significant competition from other gaming operations and racing and pari-mutuel operations.

Gaming operations.  The gaming industry is characterized by a high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery and poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming, Internet gaming and other forms of gambling in the United States. In a broader sense, our gaming operations face competition from all manner of leisure and entertainment activities, including shopping, high school, collegiate and professional athletic events, television and movies, concerts and travel. Legalized gaming is currently permitted in various forms throughout the U.S., in several Canadian provinces and on various lands taken into trust for the benefit of certain Native Americans in the U.S. and Canada. Other jurisdictions, including states adjacent to states in which we currently have facilities, may legalize gaming in the near future. In addition, established gaming jurisdictions could award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion of existing gaming operations. New or expanded operations by other persons will increase competition for our gaming operations and could have a material adverse impact on us.

Gaming competition is particularly intense in each of the markets where we operate or where we may operate in the future. As competing properties have opened, our operating results may be negatively affected. Some of our competitors have more gaming industry experience, are larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources. In addition, some of our direct competitors in certain markets may have superior facilities and/or operating conditions. There could be further

15

competition in our markets as a result of the upgrading or expansion of facilities by existing market participants, the entrance of new gaming participants into a market or legislative changes.

We expect each existing or future market in which we participate to be highly competitive. The competitive position of each of our casino properties is discussed in detail in the subsection entitled “Competition—Gaming Operations” of this Exhibit 99.1.

Racing and pari-mutuel operations.  Our racing and pari-mutuel operations face significant competition for wagering dollars from other racetracks and off-track wagering facilities, some of which also offer other forms of gaming, as well as other gaming venues such as casinos and state sponsored lotteries, including the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and West Virginia lotteries. Our telephone account and Internet wagering operations compete with providers of such services throughout the country. We also may face competition in the future from new off-track wagering facilities, new racetracks or new providers of telephone account or Internet wagering. From time to time, states consider legislation to permit other forms of gaming. If additional gaming opportunities become available near our racing and pari-mutuel operations, such gaming opportunities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are or may become involved in legal proceedings that, if adversely adjudicated or settled, could impact our financial condition.

We are defendants in various lawsuits relating to matters incidental to our business. The nature of our business subjects us to the risk of lawsuits filed by customers, past and present employees, competitors and others in the ordinary course of business. As with all litigation, no assurance can be provided as to the outcome of these matters and in general, litigation can be expensive and time consuming. We may not be successful in the defense of these lawsuits, which could result in settlements or damages that could significantly impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. (For example, those lawsuits listed in Item 3 below).

We face extensive regulation from gaming and other regulatory authorities.

Licensing requirements.  As owners and operators of gaming and pari-mutuel wagering facilities, we are subject to extensive state, local and, in Canada, provincial regulation. State, local and provincial authorities require us and our subsidiaries to demonstrate suitability to obtain and retain various licenses and require that we have registrations, permits and approvals to conduct gaming operations. Various regulatory authorities, including the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission, the Illinois Gaming Board, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, the Mississippi State Tax Commission, the Mississippi Gaming Commission, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission, the New Jersey Racing Commission, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission, the West Virginia Racing Commission, the West Virginia Lottery Commission, the Maine Gambling Control Board and the Maine Harness Racing Commission, have broad discretion, and may, for any reason set forth in the applicable legislation, rules and regulations, limit, condition, suspend, fail to renew or revoke a license or registration to conduct gaming operations or prevent us from owning the securities of any of our gaming subsidiaries or prevent another person from owning an equity interest in us. Like all gaming operators in the jurisdictions in which we operate, we must periodically apply to renew our gaming licenses or registrations and have the suitability of certain of our directors, officers and employees approved. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such renewals or approvals. Regulatory authorities have input into our operations, for instance, hours of operation, location or relocation of a facility, numbers and types of machines and loss limits. Regulators may also levy substantial fines against or seize our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries or the people involved in violating gaming laws or regulations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

16

We have demonstrated suitability to obtain and have obtained all governmental licenses, registrations, permits and approvals necessary for us to operate our existing gaming and pari-mutuel facilities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain them or demonstrate suitability to obtain any new licenses, registrations, permits or approvals. In addition, the loss of a license in one jurisdiction could trigger the loss of a license or affect our eligibility for a license in another jurisdiction. If we expand our gaming operations in our existing jurisdictions or to new areas, we may have to meet additional suitability requirements and obtain additional licenses, registrations, permits and approvals from gaming authorities in these jurisdictions. The approval process can be time-consuming and costly and we cannot be sure that we will be successful.

Gaming authorities in the U.S. generally can require that any beneficial owner of our securities file an application for a finding of suitability. If a gaming authority requires a record or beneficial owner of our securities to file a suitability application, the owner must generally apply for a finding of suitability within 30 days or at an earlier time prescribed by the gaming authority. The gaming authority has the power to investigate such an owner’s suitability and the owner must pay all costs of the investigation. If the owner is found unsuitable, then the owner may be required by law to dispose of our securities.

Potential changes in legislation and regulation of our operations.  Regulations governing the conduct of gaming activities and the obligations of gaming companies in any jurisdiction in which we have or in the future may have gaming operations are subject to change and could impose additional operating, financial or other burdens on the way we conduct our business.

Moreover, legislation to prohibit or limit gaming may be introduced in the future in states where gaming has been legalized. In addition, from time to time, legislators and special interest groups have proposed legislation that would expand, restrict or prevent gaming operations or which may otherwise adversely impact our operations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Any expansion of gaming or restriction on or prohibition of our gaming operations or enactment of other adverse regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Taxation and fees.  We believe that the prospect of significant revenue is one of the primary reasons that jurisdictions permit legalized gaming. As a result, gaming companies are typically subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal, state, local and provincial income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations. From time to time, federal, state, local and provincial legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax laws, or in the administration of such laws, affecting the gaming industry. In addition, worsening economic conditions could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes. It is not possible to determine with certainty the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration of such laws. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, effective July 1, 2003, the State of Illinois increased the graduated gaming tax rate structure by increasing certain tax rates, adding new tax brackets and raising the highest marginal tax rate from 50% to 70%. Additionally, Illinois increased the admission tax from $3 to $5 per person. The large number of state and local governments with significant current or projected budget deficits makes it more likely that those governments that currently permit gaming will seek to fund such deficits with new or increased gaming taxes, and worsening economic conditions could intensify those efforts. Any material increase, or the adoption of additional taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our future financial results.

Compliance with other laws.  We are also subject to a variety of other rules and regulations, including zoning, environmental, construction and land-use laws and regulations governing the serving of alcoholic beverages. If we are not in compliance with these laws, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

17

We depend on our key personnel.

We are highly dependent on the services of Peter M. Carlino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kevin G. DeSanctis, our President and Chief Operating Officer, and other members of our senior management team. Our ability to retain key personnel is affected by the competitiveness of our compensation packages and the other terms and conditions of employment, our continued ability to compete effectively against other gaming companies and our growth prospects. The loss of the services of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses and compliance risks.

New or changing laws and regulations relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and NASDAQ National Market rules, are creating uncertainty for companies. These new or changed laws and regulations are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, recent issuance and/or lack of guidance. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty and higher costs regarding compliance matters. Due to our commitment to maintain high standards of compliance with laws and public disclosure, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in and are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses. In addition, we are subject to different parties’ interpretation of our compliance with these new and changing laws and regulations. A failure to comply with any of these new laws or regulations, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, could have a materially adverse effect on the company. For instance, if our gaming authorities, the SEC, our independent auditors or our shareholders and potential shareholders conclude that our compliance with the regulations is unsatisfactory, this may result in a negative public perception of our company, subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny, penalties or otherwise adversely affect us.

Inclement weather and other conditions could seriously disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The operations of our facilities are subject to disruptions or reduced patronage as a result of severe weather conditions, natural disasters and other casualties. Because many of our gaming operations are located on or adjacent to rivers, these facilities are subject to risks in addition to those associated with land-based casinos, including loss of service due to casualty, forces of nature, mechanical failure, extended or extraordinary maintenance, flood, hurricane or other severe weather conditions. For example, in September 2004, Casino Rouge in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Casino Magic-Bay St. Louis in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, and Boomtown Biloxi in Biloxi, Mississippi were closed on a precautionary basis in anticipation of Hurricane Ivan. In addition, several of our casinos are subject to risks generally associated with the movement of vessels on inland waterways, including risks of collision or casualty due to river turbulence and traffic. Many of our casinos operate in areas which are subject to periodic flooding that has caused us to experience decreased attendance and increased operating expenses. Any flood or other severe weather condition could lead to the loss of use of a casino facility for an extended period. Reduced patronage and the loss of a dockside casino or riverboat from service for any period of time could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to environmental laws and potential exposure to environmental liabilities.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern our operations, including emissions and discharges into the environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous and nonhazardous substances and wastes. Failure to comply with such laws and

18

regulations could result in costs for corrective action, penalties or the imposition of other liabilities or restrictions. From time to time, we have incurred and are incurring costs and obligations for correcting environmental noncompliance matters. To date, none of these matters have had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such matters will not have such an effect in the future.

We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and clean-up responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Under certain of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating contaminated soil or groundwater on or from its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused, the contamination, as well as incur liability to third parties impacted by such contamination. The presence of contamination, or failure to remediate it properly, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent property. The Bullwhackers and Silver Hawk Casinos are located within the geographic footprint of the Clear Creek/Central City Superfund Site, a large area of historic mining activity which is the subject of state and federal clean-up actions. Although we have not been named a potentially responsible party for this Superfund Site, it is possible that as a result of our ownership and operation of these properties (on which mining may have occurred in the past), we may incur costs related to this matter in the future. Furthermore, we are aware that there is or may be soil or groundwater contamination at certain of our facilities resulting from current or former operations. These matters are in various stages of investigation, and we are not able at this time to estimate the costs that will be required to resolve them. To date, none of these matters or other matters arising under environmental laws has had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such matters will not have such an effect in the future.

The concentration and evolution of the slot machine manufacturing industry could impose additional costs on us.

A majority of our revenues are attributable to slot machines operated by us at our gaming faciltities. It is important, for competitive reasons, that we offer the most popular and up to date slot machine games with the latest technology to our customers.

We believe that a substantial majority of the slot machines sold in the U.S. in 2004 were manufactured by a few select companies. In addition, we believe that one company in particular provided a majority of all slot machines sold in the U.S. in 2004.

In recent years, the prices of new slot machines have escalated faster than the rate of inflation. Furthermore, in recent years, slot machine manufacturers have frequently refused to sell slot machines featuring the most popular games, instead requiring participation lease arrangements in order to acquire the machines. Participation slot machine leasing arrangements typically require the payment of a fixed daily rental. Such agreements may also include a percentage payment of coin-in or net win. Generally, a participation lease is substantially more expensive over the long term than the cost to purchase a new machine.

For competitive reasons, we may be forced to purchase new slot machines or enter into participation lease arrangements that are more expensive than our current costs associated with the continued operation of our existing slot machines. If the newer slot machines do not result in sufficient incremental revenues to offset the increased investment and participation lease costs, it could hurt our profitability.

We depend on agreements with our horsemen and pari-mutuel clerks.

The Federal Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, as amended, the West Virginia Racing Act and the Pennsylvania Racing Act require that, in order to simulcast races, we have written agreements with

19

the horse owners and trainers at our West Virginia and Pennsylvania race tracks. In addition, in order to operate gaming machines in West Virginia, we are required to enter into written agreements regarding the proceeds of the gaming machines with a representative of a majority of the horse owners and trainers, a representative of a majority of the pari-mutuel clerks and a representative of a majority of the horse breeders.

Effective October 1, 2004, we signed an agreement with the Pennsylvania Thoroughbred Horsemen at Penn National Race Course that expires on September 30, 2011. At the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, we have an agreement with the Charles Town Horsemen that became effective on January 1, 2005 and expires on December 31, 2007. Our agreement with the pari-mutuel clerks at Charles Town expires on March 31, 2005. We are in active discussions with the pari-mutuel clerks at Charles Town regarding a new agreement or an extension of the existing agreement, however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into a new agreement or an extension of the existing agreement on satisfactory terms or at all.

If we fail to maintain operative agreements with the horsemen at a track, we will not be permitted to conduct live racing and export and import simulcasting at that track and off-track wagering facilities, and, in West Virginia, we will not be permitted to operate our gaming machines. In addition, our simulcasting agreements are subject to the horsemen’s approval. If we fail to renew or modify existing agreements on satisfactory terms, this failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Energy and fuel price increases may adversely affect our costs of operations and our revenues.

Our casino properties use significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy. While no shortages of energy have been experienced, the recent substantial increases in the cost of electricity in the United States will negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, energy and fuel price increases in cities that constitute a significant source of customers for our properties could result in a decline in disposable income of potential customers and a corresponding decrease in visitation to our properties, which would negatively impact our revenues. The extent of the impact is subject to the magnitude and duration of the energy and fuel price increases, but this impact could be material.

We Face Risks Related to Our Capital Structure.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt.

We continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to our financial health. For example, it could:

•                  increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in our business;

•                  require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt service, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

•                  limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

•                  place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged;

20

•                  limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds; and

•                  result in an event of default if we fail to satisfy our obligations under our debt or fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in our debt, which event of default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable and could permit certain of our lenders to foreclose on our assets securing such debt.

Any of the above listed factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, including to fund acquisitions. The terms of our existing indebtedness do not, and any future debt (including any senior secured credit facilities financing the Argosy merger) may not, fully prohibit us from doing so. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

The availability and cost of financing could have an adverse effect on business.

We intend to finance our current and future expansion and renovation projects primarily with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our current senior secured credit facility and equity or debt financings. If we are unable to finance our current or future expansion projects, we will have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned expansion, development and renovation projects as well as capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity financing or joint venture partners, or modifying our bank credit facility. These sources of funds may not be sufficient to finance our expansion, and other financing may not be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. In addition, our existing indebtedness contains certain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness. If we are unable to secure additional financing, we could be forced to limit or suspend expansion, development and renovation projects, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our indebtedness imposes restrictive covenants on us.

Our existing senior secured credit facility requires (and the senior secured credit facilities we intend to enter into to finance the Argosy merger will require) us, among other obligations, to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial tests, including fixed charge coverage and total leverage and senior leverage ratios. In addition, our existing senior secured credit facility restricts (and the senior secured credit facilities we intend to enter into to finance the Argosy merger) will restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, repay indebtedness or amend debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, make capital expenditures, or engage in certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates and otherwise restrict corporate activities. A failure to comply with the restrictions contained in our senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing our existing senior subordinated notes could lead to an event of default thereunder which could result in an acceleration of such indebtedness. In addition, the indentures relating to our senior subordinated notes restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness (excluding certain indebtedness under senior secured credit facilities), make certain payments and dividends or merge or consolidate. A failure to comply with the restrictions in any of the indentures governing the notes could result in an event of default under such indenture which could result in an acceleration of such indebtedness and a default under our other debt, including our existing senior subordinated notes and our senior secured credit facilities.

21

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash, which depends on many factors beyond our control.

Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our existing senior secured credit facility will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for the next few years.

We cannot assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our existing senior secured credit facility in amounts sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity needs, including with respect to our indebtedness. In addition, if we consummate significant acquisitions in the future, our cash requirements may increase significantly. As we are required to satisfy amortization requirements under our existing senior secured credit facility or as other debt matures, we may also need to raise funds to refinance all or a portion of our debt. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt, including our existing senior secured credit facility, on attractive terms, commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our future operating performance and our ability to service or refinance the notes, extend or refinance our debt, including our existing senior secured credit facility, will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as variations in operating results, actions by various regulatory agencies and legislatures, litigation, market perceptions, progress with respect to potential acquisitions, changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts, the actions of rating agencies, the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us, and news reports relating to trends in our markets or general economic conditions.

An Event of Default has occurred under the indentures governing the Hollywood Casino Shreveport notes.

Our subsidiaries, HCS and Shreveport Capital Corporation, are issuers of $39 million aggregate principal amount of 13% senior secured notes due 2006 and $150 million aggregate principal amount of 13% first mortgage notes due 2006 (together, the “HCS notes”). The HCS issuers and the other obligors under the HCS notes are unrestricted subsidiaries under our existing senior secured credit facility, the existing note indentures. The HCS notes are non-recourse to us and our subsidiaries (other than the HCS issuers, HCS I, HCS II and HWCC-Louisiana).

On August 27, 2004, HCS, in cooperation with an Ad Hoc Committee representing a majority of its noteholders, entered into an agreement with Eldorado Resorts LLC (“Eldorado”) providing for Eldorado’s acquisition of HCS. On September 10, 2004, a group of creditors led by Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC filed an involuntary Chapter 11 case against HCS. On October 28, 2004, HCS filed a joint plan and disclosure statement that incorporates the Eldorado transaction. On October 30, 2004, HCS agreed to the entry of an order for relief in the Chapter 11 case that has been filed against it and HCS I, HCS II, HWCC-Louisiana and Shreveport Capital commenced voluntary cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

HCS filed a revised reorganization plan and disclosure statement with the Bankruptcy Court on March 3, 2005. The plan continues to provide for the acquisition of the hotel and casino by Eldorado under the agreement announced last year. The Official Bondholder Committee in the Chapter 11 case has joined HCS as a proponent of the plan. The Bankruptcy Court has set a hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement for April 11, 2005. Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and KOAR International (Paul Alanis) continue to express interest in acquiring the hotel and casino and have

22

asked the Bankruptcy Court for permission to file their own competing plan. HCS intends to oppose that request.

It is uncertain at this time what the outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings will be, whether the Eldorado transaction will be consummated or what the timing or terms of the proceedings or transaction would be, or what the effect on HCS or us or any of our other subsidiaries will be. The outcome of the proceedings and transaction could include a sale, liquidation and dissolution, bankruptcy and/or further litigation filed with respect to HCS and its affiliates.

Available Information

For more information about us, visit our web site at www.pngaming.com. Our electronic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including all annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports), including the exhibits, are available free of charge through our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

The following describes our principal real estate properties:

Charles Town Entertainment Complex.  We own a 250-acre parcel in Charles Town, West Virginia, a portion of which contains the Charles Town Entertainment Complex. The property also includes a newly refurbished ³¤₄-mile thoroughbred racetrack and an enclosed grandstand/clubhouse.

Hollywood Casino Aurora.  We own an 117,000 square foot dockside barge structure and land based pavilion with 53,000 square feet of gaming space in Aurora, Illinois. The property also includes two parking garages under capital lease agreements.

Casino Rouge.  We own five acres of a 23-acre site on the east bank of the Mississippi River in the East Baton Rouge Downtown Development District. The remaining 18 acres of the site are currently leased. The property site serves as the dockside embarkation for the Casino Rouge and features a two-story, 58,000 square foot building. The Casino Rouge is a four-story 47,000 square foot riverboat casino, which we own.

Casino Magic—Bay St. Louis.  We own approximately 591 acres in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, including the 17-acre marina where the gaming barge is moored. The property includes an 18-hole golf course, two hotels, and other land-based facilities, all of which we own.

Hollywood Casino Tunica.  We lease approximately 70 acres of land in Tunica, Mississippi, which contains a single-level casino with 54,000 square feet of gaming space and other land-based facilities. Hollywood Casino Tunica is located amongst a cluster of gaming facilities, including those operated by Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. and Boyd Gaming Corporation.

Boomtown Biloxi.  We lease substantially all of the 19 acres on which Boomtown Biloxi is located under a 99-year lease that began in 1994. We also lease approximately 5 acres of submerged tidelands at the casino site from the State of Mississippi under a ten-year lease with a five-year option to renew. We own the barge on which the casino with 33,600 square feet of gaming space is located and all of the land-based facilities. In January 2004, we completed the acquisition of an adjacent property which we plan to utilize for additional parking and to develop the property in the event we move the casino barge.

Bullwhackers.  Our Bullwhackers Casino, the adjoining Bullpen Sports Casino and the Silver Hawk Saloon and Casino are located on an approximately four-acre site. We own the Bullwhackers Casino

23

and Silver Hawk Saloon and Casino properties and lease Bullpen Sports Casino property. The casinos on the property have 20,700 square feet of gaming space.

Casino Rama.  We do not own any of the land located at or near the casino or Casino Rama’s facilities and equipment. The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation has a long-term ground lease with an affiliate of the Mnjikaning First Nation, for the land on which Casino Rama is situated. Under the Development and Operating Agreement, CHC Casinos has been granted a license coupled with an interest in land pursuant to which it, as the operator, has been granted full access to Casino Rama during the term of the Development and Operating Agreement to perform its services under the Agreement. The Casino Rama facilities are located on approximately 57 acres.

Penn National Race Course.  We own approximately 225 acres in Grantville, Pennsylvania where the Penn National Race Course is located. The property includes a one-mile all-weather thoroughbred racetrack and a ⁷¤₈-mile turf track, a clubhouse and a grandstand. The property also includes approximately 400 acres surrounding the Penn National Race Course that are available for future expansion or development.

Freehold Raceway.  Through our joint venture, we own a 51-acre site in Freehold in Western Monmouth County, New Jersey where Freehold Raceway in located. The property features a half-mile oval harness track and a 150,000 square foot grandstand.

Bangor Historic Track.  We lease approximately 27 acres located at Bass Park in Bangor, Maine, which consists of over 12,000 square feet of grandstand space with seating for 3,500 patrons.

OTWs.  We own one of our existing OTW facilities and lease the remaining five facilities. The following is a list of our OTW facilities and their locations:

Our OTW Locations

Other.  We lease approximately 19,196 square feet of office and warehouse space in three office buildings in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania for our executive offices. The office buildings are owned by an affiliates of Peter M. Carlino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. We believe the lease terms for the executive office and warehouse to be no less favorable than such lease terms that could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

24

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

1.                                      Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings relating to personal injuries, employment matters, commercial transactions and other matters arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the final outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. In addition, we maintain what we believe is adequate insurance coverage to further mitigate the risks of such proceedings. However, such proceedings can be costly, time consuming and unpredictable and, therefore, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of such proceedings may not materially impact our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Further, no assurance can be given that the amount or scope of existing insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover losses arising from such matters.

The following proceedings could result in costs, settlements or damages that materially impact our consolidated financial condition or operating results. In each instance, we believe that we have meritorious defenses and/or counter-claims and intend to vigorously defend ourself.

In August 2002, the lessor of the property on which Casino Rouge conducts a significant portion of its dockside operations filed a lawsuit against us in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana seeking a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff landlord is entitled to terminate the lease and/or void our option to renew the lease due to certain alleged defaults by us or our predecessors-in-interest. The term of our lease expired in January 2004 and we exercised our automatic right to renew for an additional five-year term (which, as previously noted, is being contested by the landlord). In September 2003, the court granted us a partial motion for summary judgment. On October 26, 2004, in ruling on a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, the court determined that we were in default of an obligation in the lease and that the lease is dissolved. We plan to vigorously appeal this decision, which suspends any effect of the October 26, 2004 order during the pendency of the appeal. Depending on the outcome of the appeal, we may eventually choose from options which may include entering into a new lease with the plaintiff, purchasing the property from the plaintiff or relocating. Any of these options are likely to involve significant costs. A relocation of the boat will require regulatory and/or local approvals. In March 2005, the plaintiff filed an additional lawsuit against us seeking (i) a ruling that additional rent is due to the landlord as a result of the default, (ii) that a lessor’s lien should be placed on certain property to secure the payment of such rent, and (iii) a declaration that certain improvements revert to the landlord upon termination of the lease.

In October 2002, in response to our plans to relocate the river barge underlying the Boomtown Biloxi casino to an adjacent property, the lessor of the property on which the Boomtown Biloxi casino conducts a portion of its dockside operations, filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi seeking a declaratory judgment that (i) we must use the leased premises for a gaming use or, in the alternative, (ii) after the move, we will remain obligated to make the revenue based rent payments to plaintiff set forth in the lease. The plaintiff filed this suit immediately after the Mississippi Gaming Commission approved our request to relocate the barge. Since such approval, the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have also approved our plan to relocate the barge. We filed a motion for summary judgment in October 2003 and the plaintiff filed its own motion for summary judgment in January 2004. In March 2004, the trial court ruled in favor of us on all counts. The plaintiff’s subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied and plaintiff has appealed the decision to the Fifth Circuit. A hearing on the appeal is scheduled for April 4, 2005.

On August 27, 2004, our unrestricted subsidiary, Hollywood Casino Shreveport, or HCS, in cooperation with an Ad Hoc Committee representing a majority of its noteholders, entered into an

25

agreement with Eldorado Resorts LLC (“Eldorado”) providing for acquisition of HCS by certain affiliates of Eldorado. On September 10, 2004, certain creditors of the Hollywood Casino Shreveport filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Louisiana, located in Shreveport, Louisiana, an involuntary petition against Hollywood Casino Shreveport for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On October 28, 2004, HCS filed a joint plan and disclosure statement that incorporates the Eldorado Transaction. On October 30, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order for relief. Hollywood Casino Shreveport continues to manage its assets and business as a “debtor in possession” subject to the powers and supervision of the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to Chapter 11. In addition, on October 30, 2004, HCS I, Inc. and HCS II, Inc., the general partners of Hollywood Casino Shreveport, HWCC-Louisiana, Inc., the parent company of both HCS I, Inc. and HCS II, Inc., and Shreveport Capital Corporation commenced voluntary cases under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Louisiana.

HCS filed a revised reorganization plan and disclosure statement with the Bankruptcy Court on March 3, 2005. The plan continues to provide for the acquisition of the hotel and casino by Eldorado under the agreement announced last year. The Official Bondholder Committee in the Chapter 11 case has joined HCS as a proponent of the plan. The Bankruptcy Court has set a hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement for April 11, 2005. Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and KOAR International (Paul Alanis) continue to express interest in acquiring the hotel and casino and have asked the Bankruptcy Court for permission to file their own competing plan. HCS intends to oppose that request.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Range of Market Price

Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “PENN.” The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ National Market.

The closing sale price per share of common stock on The NASDAQ National Market on March 10, 2005, was $28.96 As of March 10, 2005, there were approximately 626 holders of record of common stock. All references to sales prices of our common stock have been retroactively restated to reflect the increased number of common stock shares outstanding pursuant to the March 7, 2005 stock split.

26

Dividend Policy

Since our initial public offering of common stock in May 1994, we have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain all of our earnings to finance the development of our business, and thus, do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Payment of any cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our future earnings, operations and capital requirements, our general financial condition and general business conditions. Moreover, our existing credit facility prohibits us from authorizing, declaring or paying any dividends until our commitments under the credit facility have been terminated and all amounts outstanding thereunder have been repaid. In addition, future financing arrangements may prohibit the payment of dividends under certain conditions.

ITEM 6.  SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial and operating data for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our consolidated financial statements that have been audited by BDO Seidman, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The selected consolidated financial and operating data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and Notes thereto, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the other financial information included herein.

27

(1)                                  Reflects operations included since the August 8, 2000 acquisition of Casino Magic—Bay St. Louis casino and Boomtown Biloxi casino.

(2)                                  Reflects operations included since the April 27, 2001 acquisition of all of the gaming assets of CRC Holdings, Inc. and the minority interest in Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc.

(3)                                  Reflects operations included since the April 25, 2002 acquisition of Bullwhackers.

(4)                                  Reflects the operations of the Hollywood Casino properties since the March 3, 2003 acquisition date.

(5)                                  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(6)                                  Per share data has been retroactively restated to reflect the increased number of common stock shares outstanding as a result of our June 25, 2002 and March 7, 2005 stock splits.

(7)                                  Does not include discontinued operations.

28

ITEM 7.         MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Operations

We are a leading, diversified, multi-jurisdictional owner and operator of gaming properties, as well as horse racetracks and associated off-track wagering facilities, or OTWs. We own or operate nine gaming properties located in Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ontario and West Virginia that are focused primarily on serving customers within driving distance of the properties. We also own one racetrack and six OTWs in Pennsylvania, one racetrack in West Virginia, one racetrack in Maine, and through a joint venture, own and operate a racetrack in New Jersey. On February 12, 2004, we completed the purchase of Bangor Historic Track, Inc. which operates harness racing at the city owned track at Bass Park in Bangor, Maine. We operate in two segments, gaming and racing, and derive substantially all of our revenues from such operations. We believe that our portfolio of assets provides us with a diversified cash flow from operations.

We have made significant acquisitions in the past few years and expect to continue to pursue additional acquisition and development opportunities in the future. On March 3, 2003, we completed our largest acquisition to date, the acquisition of Hollywood Casino Corporation. The Hollywood Casino Corporation acquisition significantly increased our revenues and cash flow. In Maine, subsequent to our February 12, 2004 purchase of Bangor Historic Track, Inc., we were granted an unconditional racing license for 2004 (and a renewal for 2005) and operated a 27-day harness meet at Bass Park in Bangor. The annual license represents the first regulatory approval necessary for us to proceed with our anticipated $74 million development project for a 1,500 slot machine gaming facility and to satisfy a condition precedent to completing our purchase of Bangor Historic Track. On July 5, 2004, Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell signed into law the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act. Our plan is to develop a completely new gaming and racing facility at our Penn National Race Course in Grantville, Pennsylvania. Under this plan, we expect to open in a new permanent facility with 2,000 slot machines within approximately one year after receiving a license at an estimated cost of $240 million, inclusive of the $50 million gaming license fee, and expand to up to 5,000 machines based on demand. While we would have preferred to develop the site, as a result of the ownership restrictions on a second slot license in the Pennsylvania gaming law, on October 15, 2004 we announced our agreement to sell our Pocono Downs facilities, land and OTWs to the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority. This sale was completed on January 25, 2005. Most notably, on November 3, 2004, we and Argosy Gaming Company announced that our boards of directors unanimously approved a definitive merger agreement under which we will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Argosy for $47.00 per share in cash. The transaction is valued at approximately $2.2 billion, including approximately $805 million of long-term debt of Argosy and its subsidiaries. Upon closing, the transaction is expected to be immediately accretive to our earnings per share. On January 20, 2005, Argosy’s shareholders approved the Merger Agreement. This transaction is an extremely significant step for us.

The vast majority of our revenue is gaming revenues derived primarily from gaming on slot machines and, to a lesser extent, table games. Racing revenues are derived from wagering on our live races, wagering on import simulcasts at our racetracks and OTWs and through telephone account wagering, and fees from wagering on export simulcasting our races. Other revenues are derived from hotel, dining, retail, admissions, program sales, concessions and certain other ancillary activities.

We intend to continue to expand our gaming operations through the implementation of a disciplined capital expenditure program at our existing properties and the continued pursuit of strategic acquisitions of gaming properties particularly in attractive regional markets.

29

Key performance indicators related to revenues are:

•                  Gaming revenue indicators—slot handle (volume indicator), table game drop (volume indicator) and “win” or “hold” percentages, which are not fully controllable by us. Our typical slot win percentage is in the range of 5% to 9% of slot handle and our typical table games win percentage is in the range of 15% to 21% of table game drop; and

•                  Racing revenue indicators—pari-mutuel wagering commissions (volume indicator) earned on wagering on our live races, wagering on import simulcasts at our racetracks and OTWs and through telephone account wagering, and fees from wagering on export simulcasting our races.

Our properties generate significant operating cash flow since most of our revenue is cash-based from slot machines and pari-mutuel wagering. Our business is capital intensive and we rely on cash flow from our properties to generate operating cash to repay debt, fund capital maintenance expenditures, fund new capital projects at existing properties and provide excess cash for future development and acquisitions.

We have reflected the results of the transactions for the disposition of Hollywood Casino Shreveport and The Downs Racing, Inc. by classifying the assets, liabilities and results of operations of Hollywood Casino Shreveport and The Downs Racing, Inc. as assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” A gain or loss on either of these transactions has not been recorded or recognized as of December 31, 2004 since the sales have not yet been deemed completed. Financial information for HCS was previously reported as part of the gaming reporting segment and financial information for The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries was previously reported as part of the racing reporting segment. For a discussion of these discontinued operations please see the subsection entitled “Discontinued Operations” below.

Results of Continuing Operations

The results of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 are summarized below (in thousands):

30

The following are the most important factors and trends that contribute to our operating performance:

•                  Most of our properties operate largely in mature competitive markets. As a result, we expect a majority of our future growth to come from acquisitions of gaming properties at reasonable valuations, jurisdictional expansions and, to a lesser extent, property expansion in under-penetrated markets.

•                  The continued pressure on governments to balance their budgets could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes, as illustrated by our experience in Illinois in 2003.

•                  Consistent with the consolidation trend in the gaming industry, the Company has been very active in acquisitions. We have acquired five casino properties, the Casino Rama management contract, and Bangor Historic Track, Inc. since January 1, 2001, and on November 3, 2004 we announced the proposed acquisition of Argosy Gaming Company.

•                  A number of states are currently considering or implementing legislation to legalize or expand gaming. Such legislation presents both potential opportunities to establish new properties (for instance in Pennsylvania and Maine) and potential competitive threats to business at our existing properties (such as Maryland). The timing and occurrence of these events remain uncertain. Legalized gaming from casinos located on Native American lands can also have a significant competitive effect.

•                  The continued demand for, and the Company’s emphasis on, slot wagering entertainment at our properties, which revenue is the consistently profitable segment of the gaming industry.

•                  The continued expansion and revenue gains at our Charles Town Entertainment Complex.

•                  Financing in a favorable interest environment and under an improved credit profile facilitates our growth.

•                  The racing revenues continue to decline at each of our racing properties. However, our gaming revenues have increased and, as a result, our racing revenues represent a less significant percentage of our overall revenue.

The results of continuing operations by reporting segment and property level for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 are summarized below (in thousands):

(1)                                  Net revenues are net of promotional allowances.

(2)                                  Reflects results since the March 3, 2003 acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Hollywood Casino Aurora revenues were $248.1 million and income from operations was $65.7 million and Hollywood Casino Tunica revenues were $113.0 million and income from operations was $12.2 million.

(3)                                  Reflects results since the April 27, 2001 acquisition.

(4)                                  Reflects results since the April 25, 2002 acquisition.

31

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Revenues

Net revenues, year ended December 31, 2004

(In thousands)

Net revenues, year ended December 31, 2003

(In thousands)

Net revenues increased in 2004 by $127.7 million, or 12.6%, to $1,140.7 million from $1,013.0 million in 2003. The two Hollywood Casino properties contributed $51.5 million of the increase primarily due to comparing a full year of operations in 2004 to a ten-month period of operations in 2003. Had we owned the properties for the full year 2003, the Hollywood Casino properties revenues would have decreased by $11.0 million between 2003 and 2004 primarily due to the effects of the increase in the gaming tax structure at the Hollywood Casino Aurora property. From the properties we owned prior to the acquisition of the Hollywood Casino properties, revenues increased by $76.2 million, or 11.7%. The Charles Town Entertainment Complex had another record year as revenues increased by $71.0 million due to a full year of results from the 2003 gaming area expansion and the addition of 300 new slot machines during 2004.

Gaming Revenues

Gaming revenue increased in 2004 by $120.9 million, or 13.9%, to $992.1 million from $871.2 million in 2003. The Hollywood Casino properties contributed $47.9 million of the increase and the properties we owned prior to the acquisition contributed the remaining $73.0 million of the increased gaming revenue. Of this total, Charles Town Entertainment Complex increased gaming revenue by $68.6 million as a result of the expansion that added 700 gaming machines in July 2003 and the addition of 300 new slot machines during 2004. The average number of gaming machines in play at Charles Town Entertainment Complex increased to 3,659 in 2004 from 3,089 in 2003, with the average win per machine increasing to $273 in 2004 from $264 per day in 2003 as a result of increased patronage by mid-week and drive-in customers due to the success of our marketing program targeted

32

toward such customers. At Bullwhackers Casinos gaming revenue increased by $5.0 million in 2004. The revenue gains were a result of an increase in patronage from more effective marketing programs and a change in product mix that resulted in a higher hold percentage and average win per unit per day. Casino Rouge had an increase in gaming revenue of $1.3 million even though there was a decrease in visitation in 2004. The revenue increase was a result of a change in product mix to more low denomination video slot machines which generated higher win per day and hold percentages than higher denomination machines and an increase in table game play. These revenue gains were partially offset by a $1.6 million decline at Boomtown Biloxi caused by a loss of patronage to our competitors and Hurricane Ivan in September 2004.

Management service fees from Casino Rama increased in 2004 by $2.6 million, or 18.6%, to $16.3 million from $13.7 million in 2003. The increase in management service fees is a result of continued emphasis on marketing programs which focus on trip generation, favorable weather (mild winter months and rainy summer months), favorable table games hold percentages, compressed prior year business levels resulting from SARS and increased patronage resulting from the institution of a no-smoking policy at the largest race track beginning in June 2004. These factors more than offset the opening of the permanent Niagara Fallsview Casino and Resort.

Food, beverage and other revenue increased in 2004 by $15.7 million, or 12.5%, to $140.8 million from $125.1 million in 2003. The Hollywood Casino properties contributed $10.6 million of the increase and the properties we owned prior to the acquisition contributed $5.1 million. Charles Town increased its food, beverage and other revenue by $4.1 million as a result of expanded food court and restaurant operations, increased attendance and increased revenues from other ancillary services. At Casino Magic-Bay St. Louis, food, beverage and other revenue, including hotel revenues, increased by $1.1 million primarily as a result of marketing programs that were implemented to increase hotel occupancy and feature our dining outlets. Bullwhackers had a $.8 million, or 50%, increase in food, beverage and other revenues as a result of better food quality, the opening of a new bakery and deli on the casino floor and offering additional cash services for our patrons. At Boomtown Biloxi, revenues decreased by $.9 million as a result of lost business from Hurricane Ivan and a change in our food and beverage marketing programs.

Promotional allowances increased in 2004 by $9.7 million to $65.6 million from $55.9 million in 2003. The Hollywood Casino properties accounted for $6.9 million of the increase and the properties we owned prior to the acquisition increased by $2.8 million. Charles Town had an increase in its promotional allowance costs of $1.6 million primarily due to the increase in slot machine play and attendance at the expanded facility and increased membership in its players’ club. Casino Magic-Bay St. Louis also had an increase of $1.3 million in promotional allowances as a result of changes to our marketing programs that focus on increasing casino play and facility utilization.

Racing revenues

Racing revenues decreased in 2004 by $2.1 million, or 4.1%, to $49.9 million from $52.0 million in 2003. In 2004, due to inclement weather, we lost thirteen race days at Penn National Race Course and had a decline in attendance at the OTWs that remained open during any inclemency. We also experienced a decline in our call center revenue as a result of restrictions placed on telephone and internet wagering account activity by various state gaming regulatory agencies. These factors caused a decrease in racing revenue of $2.9 million in Pennsylvania. In Bangor, Maine, we ran a 27-day harness meet and had racing revenues of $.8 million in 2004.

Food, beverage and other revenues increased by approximately $.2 million in Pennsylvania and were approximately $.2 million at the Bangor Historic Track.

33

Operating Expenses

Operating Expenses, year ended December 31, 2004

(In thousands)

Operating Expenses, year ended December 31, 2003

(In thousands)

Total operating expenses increased in 2004 by $90.4 million, or 10.8%, to $926.9 million from $836.5 million in 2003. The two Hollywood Casino properties contributed $39.2 million of the increase primarily due to comparing a full year of operations in 2004 to a ten-month period of operations in 2003. However, had we owned the properties for the full year 2003, the Hollywood Casino properties operating expenses would have decreased by $11.0 million between 2003 and 2004 primarily due to the effects of the increase in the gaming tax structure at the Hollywood Casino Aurora property. From the properties we owned prior to the acquisition of the Hollywood Casino properties, operating expenses increased by $51.2 million, or 8.5%.

Gaming operating expenses

Gaming expenses increased in 2004 by $69.3 million, or 14.4%, to $544.7 million from $475.4 million in 2003. The Hollywood Casino properties accounted for $26.1 million of the increase and the expenses at the properties we owned prior to the acquisition increased by $43.2 million. At Charles Town, gaming expenses increased by $41.8 million and included gaming taxes attributable to the increased gaming revenue and salaries, wages and benefits due to the additional staffing levels needed to accommodate the expanded gaming floor area and increased customer volumes. Gaming expenses increased at Casino Magic-Bay St. Louis by $2.0 million as a result of marketing expenditures, primarily for entertainment expenses, promotional giveaways and VIP function-related expenses that were focused on driving attendance and slot machine play. Boomtown Biloxi had a decrease in gaming expenses of $2.1 million resulting primarily from changes made in the marketing and promotion programs and a decrease in gaming taxes that were directly attributable to lower gaming revenues. Casino Rouge also had a decrease in gaming expenses of $1.7 million in 2004. The decrease was a result of a change in product mix that also included a reduction in the number of participation games on the floor and lower participation fees, lower marketing costs and lower labor costs as a result of a change to ticket-in-ticket-out slot machines. At the Bullwhackers Casinos, gaming expenses increased by

34

$3.3 million in 2004 as a result of an increase in gaming taxes that resulted from higher gaming revenues and a higher effective gaming tax rate and an increase in marketing expenses.

Food, beverage and other expenses increased in 2004 by $5.0 million to $93.0 million from $88.0 million in 2003. The Hollywood Casino properties accounted for $1.4 million of the increase and the properties we owned prior to the acquisition produced the remaining $3.6 million increase. These expenses increased at Charles Town by $3.5 million due to increased food and beverage volumes from increased attendance, increases in food costs and increases in staffing. Boomtown Biloxi had a decrease in expenses primarily as a result of decreased food and beverage revenues. The other properties had minor fluctuations in food, beverage and other expenses as a result of volume changes and higher food costs.

General and administrative expenses increased by $8.4 million to $171.1 million in 2004 from $162.7 million in 2003. The increase was generated entirely by our gaming properties and corporate overhead. The addition of the two Hollywood properties increased general and administrative expenses by $8.8 million, the properties we owned prior to acquisition had an decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1.3 million and corporate overhead increased by $.9 million. General and administrative expenses at the properties includes facility maintenance, utilities, property and liability insurance, housekeeping, and all administration departments such as accounting, purchasing, human resources, legal and internal audit. The general and administrative expenses at Charles Town increased by $1.5 million primarily due to additional payroll related costs for the expanded facility and increased property and general liability insurance costs. Our other properties had small decreases in general and administrative expenses due to decreases in property and general liability expenses, and payroll related expenses. Corporate overhead expenses increased by $.9 million in 2004 as compared to 2003. Corporate expenses such as payroll and employees benefits, outside services and travel have increased as a result of the Hollywood Casino acquisition in 2003. Lobbying expenses in connection with Pennsylvania slot legislation and Maine gaming regulations also increased corporate costs. However, our corporate overhead as a percentage of our net revenues decreased.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $8.2 million, or 14.7%, to $64.1 million in 2004 from $55.9 million in 2003. The addition of the Hollywood Casino properties increased depreciation and amortization expense by $3.0 million. The remaining increase of $5.2 million was primarily a result of the expansion at Charles Town for additional gaming space and the parking structure and the purchase of new slot machines at many of our properties.

Racing operating expenses

Racing expenses decreased in 2004 by $2.8 million, or 6.6%, to $39.0 million from $41.8 million in 2003. The decrease in Pennsylvania racing expenses were partially offset by $.9 million in racing expenses at the Bangor Historic Track in Maine. Expenses that have a direct relationship to racing revenue such as purse expense, pari-mutuel taxes, simulcast fees and totalisator expense all decreased with the decrease in racing revenues.

Other racing related expenses such as food, beverage and other expenses, general and administrative expenses and depreciation expenses decreased slightly or have remained at the same levels as the prior year.

Income from operations

Income from operations increased by $37.3 million, or 21.1%, to $213.8 million in 2004 from $176.5 million in 2003. The increase was generated entirely by our gaming properties. The Hollywood Casino properties contributed $12.3 million. Our overall profit margin increased to 18.7% in 2004 from 17.4% in 2003. We credit our property management teams for these results as their continued focus on customer and employee satisfaction, market share gains and operating margin improvements contribute to our consolidated improvement in income from continuing operations and operating margins.

35

Other income (expense) summary (in thousands):