SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
|
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 0-24206
PENN NATIONAL
GAMING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-2234473 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
825 Berkshire Blvd.,
Suite 200
Wyomissing, PA 19610
(Address of principal executive offices)
610-373-2400
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title |
|
Outstanding as of May 4, 2007 |
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share |
|
85,562,611 (includes 380,000 shares of restricted stock) |
|
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may vary materially from expectations. Although Penn National Gaming, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Meaningful factors which could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, but are not limited to, risks related to the following: the passage of state, federal or local legislation that would expand, restrict, further tax, prevent or negatively impact (such as a smoking ban at any of our facilities) operations in the jurisdictions in which we do business; the activities of our competitors; increases in the effective rate of taxation at any of our properties or at the corporate level; successful completion of capital projects at our gaming and pari-mutuel facilities; the existence of attractive acquisition candidates, the costs and risks involved in the pursuit of those acquisitions and our ability to integrate those acquisitions; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals for our existing businesses and to receive regulatory approvals for our new businesses; the maintenance of agreements with our horsemen, pari-mutuel clerks and other organized labor groups; our dependence on key personnel; the impact of terrorism and other international hostilities; the availability and cost of financing; and other factors as discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by law.
2
PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
170,822 |
|
$ |
168,515 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,423 and $3,698 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
45,075 |
|
53,829 |
|
||
Insurance receivable |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
46,532 |
|
57,432 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
23,856 |
|
22,187 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
286,285 |
|
401,963 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
1,404,740 |
|
1,365,871 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliate |
|
16,134 |
|
16,138 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
1,866,487 |
|
1,869,444 |
|
||
Other intangible assets |
|
775,449 |
|
726,126 |
|
||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $19,248 and $16,438 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
54,576 |
|
57,386 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
106,148 |
|
77,154 |
|
||
Total other assets |
|
2,818,794 |
|
2,746,248 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,509,819 |
|
$ |
4,514,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
56,426 |
|
$ |
40,058 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
17,344 |
|
37,928 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
85,965 |
|
130,877 |
|
||
Accrued interest |
|
30,090 |
|
31,329 |
|
||
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
52,404 |
|
60,164 |
|
||
Gaming, pari-mutuel, property, and other taxes |
|
59,499 |
|
48,181 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
23,367 |
|
21,020 |
|
||
Insurance financing |
|
5,122 |
|
19,336 |
|
||
Other current liabilities |
|
31,026 |
|
26,778 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
361,243 |
|
415,671 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
2,737,012 |
|
2,789,390 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
387,179 |
|
387,615 |
|
||
Noncurrent tax liabilities |
|
59,760 |
|
|
|
||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
254 |
|
243 |
|
||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
3,184,205 |
|
3,177,248 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock ($.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock ($.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 87,163,658 and 86,814,999 shares issued at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively) |
|
872 |
|
868 |
|
||
Treasury stock (1,698,800 shares issued at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006) |
|
(2,379 |
) |
(2,379 |
) |
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
267,265 |
|
251,943 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
698,566 |
|
667,557 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
47 |
|
3,174 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
964,371 |
|
921,163 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,509,819 |
|
$ |
4,514,082 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gaming |
|
$ |
549,093 |
|
$ |
503,450 |
|
Management service fee |
|
3,474 |
|
4,387 |
|
||
Food, beverage and other |
|
73,770 |
|
66,135 |
|
||
Gross revenues |
|
626,337 |
|
573,972 |
|
||
Less promotional allowances |
|
(30,079 |
) |
(26,170 |
) |
||
Net revenues |
|
596,258 |
|
547,802 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gaming |
|
284,291 |
|
255,585 |
|
||
Food, beverage and other |
|
58,330 |
|
53,672 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
93,499 |
|
79,926 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
35,358 |
|
29,718 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
471,478 |
|
418,901 |
|
||
Income from operations |
|
124,780 |
|
128,901 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
(48,347 |
) |
(48,429 |
) |
||
Interest income |
|
876 |
|
903 |
|
||
Earnings from joint venture |
|
40 |
|
413 |
|
||
Other |
|
(228 |
) |
(110 |
) |
||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
(10,022 |
) |
||
Total other expenses |
|
(47,659 |
) |
(57,245 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from operations before income taxes |
|
77,121 |
|
71,656 |
|
||
Taxes on income |
|
34,180 |
|
29,673 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
42,941 |
|
$ |
41,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(in thousands, except share data) (unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Treasury |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Equity |
|
Income |
|
|||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
85,064,886 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
(2,379 |
) |
$ |
206,763 |
|
$ |
340,469 |
|
$ |
840 |
|
$ |
546,543 |
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity, including tax benefit of $7,589 |
|
939,838 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
20,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,924 |
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
Restricted stock |
|
440,000 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts, net of income taxes of $4,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,473 |
|
8,473 |
|
8,473 |
|
|||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,983 |
|
|
|
41,983 |
|
41,983 |
|
|||||||
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
86,444,724 |
|
$ |
864 |
|
$ |
(2,379 |
) |
$ |
228,140 |
|
$ |
382,452 |
|
$ |
9,314 |
|
$ |
618,391 |
|
$ |
50,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
86,814,999 |
|
$ |
868 |
|
$ |
(2,379 |
) |
$ |
251,943 |
|
$ |
667,557 |
|
$ |
3,174 |
|
$ |
921,163 |
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity, including tax benefit of $3,766 |
|
408,659 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
14,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,841 |
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
Restricted stock |
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts, net of income taxes of $1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
(3,130 |
) |
(3,130 |
) |
|||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
|||||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,932 |
) |
|
|
(11,932 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,941 |
|
|
|
42,941 |
|
42,941 |
|
|||||||
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
87,163,658 |
|
$ |
872 |
|
$ |
(2,379 |
) |
$ |
267,265 |
|
$ |
698,566 |
|
$ |
47 |
|
$ |
964,371 |
|
$ |
39,814 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands) (unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
42,941 |
|
$ |
41,983 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
35,358 |
|
29,718 |
|
||
Amortization of items charged to interest expense |
|
3,251 |
|
2,928 |
|
||
Loss on sale of fixed assets |
|
923 |
|
872 |
|
||
Earnings from joint venture |
|
(40 |
) |
(413 |
) |
||
Loss relating to early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
3,161 |
|
1,613 |
|
||
Charge for stock compensation |
|
6,598 |
|
4,911 |
|
||
Decrease (increase), net of businesses acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
8,754 |
|
1,369 |
|
||
Insurance receivable |
|
100,000 |
|
16,996 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
6,865 |
|
(10,915 |
) |
||
Other assets |
|
(706 |
) |
5,493 |
|
||
(Decrease) increase, net of businesses acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(20,584 |
) |
(10,035 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses |
|
(44,251 |
) |
(60,612 |
) |
||
Accrued interest |
|
(2,111 |
) |
2,495 |
|
||
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
(7,760 |
) |
(4,436 |
) |
||
Gaming, pari-mutuel, property and other taxes |
|
11,318 |
|
16,799 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
19,465 |
|
21,714 |
|
||
Noncurrent tax liabilities |
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
4,259 |
|
21,113 |
|
||
Operating cash flows from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
168,739 |
|
83,777 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
|
(74,185 |
) |
(54,393 |
) |
||
Insurance proceeds from hurricane |
|
|
|
165 |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
802 |
|
|
|
||
Acquisition of businesses and licenses, net of cash acquired |
|
(51,112 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(124,495 |
) |
(54,228 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from exercise of options |
|
4,962 |
|
8,772 |
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
113,000 |
|
136,440 |
|
||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
(149,451 |
) |
(176,839 |
) |
||
Payments on insurance financing |
|
(14,214 |
) |
|
|
||
Increase in deferred financing cost |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
3,766 |
|
7,589 |
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(41,937 |
) |
(24,050 |
) |
||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash |
|
|
|
1 |
|
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,307 |
|
5,500 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
168,515 |
|
132,620 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
170,822 |
|
$ |
138,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense paid |
|
$ |
49,836 |
|
$ |
52,596 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
11,309 |
|
$ |
3,052 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
Penn National Gaming, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (Penn) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements. For purposes of comparability, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances
Gaming revenue is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses, with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs, for chips and ticket-in, ticket-out (TITO) coupons in the customers possession, and for accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots.
Revenue from the management service contract for Casino Rama is based upon contracted terms, and is recognized when services are performed.
Food, beverage and other revenue, including racing revenue, is recognized as services are performed. Racing revenue includes the Companys share of pari-mutuel wagering on live races after payment of amounts returned as winning wagers, the Companys share of wagering from import and export simulcasting, as well as its share of wagering from its off-track wagering facilities (OTWs).
Revenues are recognized net of certain sales incentives in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) consensus on Issue 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors products) (EITF 01-9). The consensus in EITF 01-9 requires that sales incentives and points earned in point-loyalty programs be recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company recognizes incentives related to gaming play and points earned in point-loyalty programs as a direct reduction of gaming revenue.
The retail value of accommodations, food and beverage, and other services furnished to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances is primarily included in food, beverage and other expense. The amounts included in promotional allowances for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Rooms |
|
$ |
3,256 |
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
24,972 |
|
19,699 |
|
||
Other |
|
1,851 |
|
3,695 |
|
||
Total promotional allowances |
|
$ |
30,079 |
|
$ |
26,170 |
|
8
The estimated cost of providing such complimentary services for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Rooms |
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
16,555 |
|
13,941 |
|
||
Other |
|
1,055 |
|
2,796 |
|
||
Total cost of complimentary services |
|
$ |
19,233 |
|
$ |
17,878 |
|
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the additional dilution for all potentially-dilutive securities such as stock options.
The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic earnings per share to the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Options to purchase 1,757,431 and 4,168,764 shares of common stock were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they are antidilutive.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||
Determination of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
84,890 |
|
83,646 |
|
Assumed conversion of dilutive stock options |
|
2,582 |
|
2,398 |
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
87,472 |
|
86,044 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This expense must be recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant.
The Company elected the modified prospective application method for adoption, which results in the recognition of compensation expense using the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for all share-based awards granted or modified after December 31, 2005, and the recognition of compensation expense using the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), with the exception of the method of recognizing forfeitures, for all unvested awards outstanding at the date of adoption. Under this transition method, the results of operations of prior periods were not restated.
The fair value for stock options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires management to make certain assumptions. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury spot rate with a remaining term equal to the expected life assumed at the date of grant. Expected volatility was estimated based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock price over a period of 4.24 years, in order to match the expected life of the options at the grant date. There is no expected dividend yield since the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in May 1994, and since the Company intends to retain all of its earnings to finance the development of its business for the foreseeable future. The weighted-average expected life was based on the contractual term of the stock option and expected employee exercise dates, which was based on the historical exercise behavior of the Companys employees. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical experience. The following are the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for grants during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
9
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
4.84 |
% |
4.34 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
38.72 |
% |
46.98 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected life (years) |
|
4.24 |
|
4.52 |
|
Forfeiture rate |
|
4.00 |
% |
2.00 |
% |
3. New Accounting Pronouncement
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and are measured at the prevailing enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences are settled or realized. SFAS 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The realizability of the deferred tax assets is evaluated quarterly by assessing the valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of the allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. The Company has used tax-planning strategies to realize or renew net deferred tax assets in order to avoid the potential loss of future tax benefits.
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $11.9 million, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is included in noncurrent tax liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount for the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
Noncurrent |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
56,960 |
|
Additions based on current year tax positions |
|
243 |
|
|
Additions based on prior year tax positions |
|
1,812 |
|
|
Other |
|
745 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
59,760 |
|
Included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2007 were $28.2 million of tax positions that are indemnified by a third party. The receivable for this indemnification is included in other assets within the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007.
Included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2007 were $19.3 million of tax positions that, if reversed, would affect the effective tax rate.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, as well as prior to January 1, 2007, the Company recognized interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in taxes on income within the consolidated statements of income.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized approximately $0.7 million of interest and penalties. The Company has accrued approximately $30.2 million in interest and penalties for the payment of interest and penalties at March 31, 2007. These accruals were included in noncurrent tax liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007.
10
As a result of Hurricane Katrinas direct hit on the Mississippi Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005, two of the Companys casinos, Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, were significantly damaged, many employees were displaced and operations ceased at the two properties. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Companys financial results benefited from a settlement agreement with its property and business interruption insurance providers for a total of $225 million for Hurricane Katrina-related losses at its Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi properties, as well as minor proceeds related to its National Flood Insurance coverage and auto insurance claims.
The $100 million insurance receivable recorded at December 31, 2006 represented the portion of the $225 million settlement that was received in January 2007.
On August 8, 2006, the Company renewed its property insurance coverage in the amount of $200 million. The $200 million coverage is all risk, including named windstorm, flood and earthquake. Also, the Company purchased an additional $250 million of all risk coverage that is subject to certain exclusions including, among others, exclusion for named windstorms, floods and earthquakes. There is a $25 million deductible for named windstorm events, and lesser deductibles as they apply to other perils.
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, consists of the following:
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
190,569 |
|
$ |
190,002 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
919,795 |
|
868,577 |
|
||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
435,778 |
|
420,809 |
|
||
Transportation equipment |
|
2,457 |
|
2,392 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
13,455 |
|
15,005 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
190,284 |
|
187,531 |
|
||
Total property and equipment |
|
1,752,338 |
|
1,684,316 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(347,598 |
) |
(318,445 |
) |
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,404,740 |
|
$ |
1,365,871 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense, for property and equipment, totaled $33.6 million and $28.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest capitalized in connection with major construction projects was $3.1 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Companys goodwill and intangible assets had a gross carrying value of $2.7 billion and $2.6 billion at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and accumulated amortization of $21.2 million and $19.4 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The table below presents the gross carrying value, accumulated amortization, and net book value of each major class of goodwill and intangible asset at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
11
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book Value |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book Value |
|
||||||
Goodwill |
|
$ |
1,866,487 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,866,487 |
|
$ |
1,869,444 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,869,444 |
|
Gaming license and trademarks |
|
750,546 |
|
|
|
750,546 |
|
700,434 |
|
|
|
700,434 |
|
||||||
Other intangible assets |
|
46,126 |
|
21,223 |
|
24,903 |
|
45,126 |
|
19,434 |
|
25,692 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,663,159 |
|
$ |
21,223 |
|
$ |
2,641,936 |
|
$ |
2,615,004 |
|
$ |
19,434 |
|
$ |
2,595,570 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, goodwill decreased by $3.0 million, primarily due to deferred tax adjustments relating to litigation accruals. In addition, gaming license and trademarks increased by $50.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007, due to the payment for the Category 1 slot machine license for the placement of slot machines at the Companys planned Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course.
The Companys intangible asset amortization expense was $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The following table presents expected intangible asset amortization expense based on existing intangible assets at March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
2007 (9 months) |
|
$ |
5,366 |
|
2008 |
|
6,988 |
|
|
2009 |
|
5,988 |
|
|
2010 |
|
5,119 |
|
|
2011 |
|
1,442 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,903 |
|
12
7. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt, net of current maturities, is as follows:
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Senior secured credit facility |
|
$ |
2,307,750 |
|
$ |
2,343,875 |
|
$200 million 6 7/8% senior subordinated notes |
|
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
||
$250 million 6 ¾% senior subordinated notes |
|
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
|
||
Other long-term obligations |
|
25,482 |
|
25,041 |
|
||
Capital leases |
|
10,206 |
|
10,532 |
|
||
|
|
2,793,438 |
|
2,829,448 |
|
||
Less current maturities of long-term debt |
|
(56,426 |
) |
(40,058 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
2,737,012 |
|
$ |
2,789,390 |
|
The following is a schedule of future minimum repayments of long-term debt as of March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
Within one year |
|
$ |
56,426 |
|
1-3 years |
|
202,662 |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
1,506,872 |
|
|
Over 5 years |
|
1,027,478 |
|
|
Total minimum payments |
|
$ |
2,793,438 |
|
At March 31, 2007, the Company was contingently obligated under letters of credit issued pursuant to the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility with face amounts aggregating $35.1 million.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On October 3, 2005, the Company entered into a $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility to fund the Companys acquisition of Argosy Gaming Company (Argosy), including payment for all of Argosys outstanding shares, the retirement of certain long-term debt of Argosy and its subsidiaries, the payment of related transaction costs, and to provide additional working capital. The $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility consists of three credit facilities comprised of a $750 million revolving credit facility (of which $357.5 million was drawn at March 31, 2007), a $325 million Term Loan A facility and a $1.65 billion Term Loan B facility. The $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility also allows the Company to raise an additional $300 million in senior secured credit for project development and property expansion.
The $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The Company has a policy designed to manage interest rate risk associated with its current and anticipated future borrowings. This policy enables the Company to use any combination of interest rate swaps, futures, options, caps and similar instruments. To the extent the Company employs such financial instruments pursuant to this policy, they are generally accounted for as hedging instruments. In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the underlying hedged item must expose the Company to risks associated with market fluctuations and the financial instrument used must be designated as a hedge and must reduce the Companys exposure to market fluctuations throughout the hedge period. If these criteria are not met, a change in the market value of the financial instrument is recognized as a gain or loss in the period of change. Net settlements pursuant to the financial instrument are included as interest expense in the period.
In accordance with the terms of its $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, the Company was required to enter into interest rate swap agreements in an amount equal to 50% of the outstanding term loan balances within 100 days of the closing date of the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility. On October 27, 2005, the Company entered into four interest
13
rate swap contracts with terms from three to five years, notional amounts of $224 million, $274 million, $225 million, and $237 million, for a total of $960 million, and fixed interest rates ranging from 4.678% to 4.753%. The annual weighted-average interest rate of the four contracts is 4.71%. On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into three interest rate swap contracts with a term of five years and notional amounts of $100 million each, for a total of $300 million and fixed interest rates ranging from 5.263% to 5.266%. The annual weighted-average interest rate of the three contracts is 5.26%. Under all of these contracts, the Company pays a fixed interest rate against a variable interest rate based on the 90-day LIBOR rate. The 90-day LIBOR rate relating to these contracts as of March 31, 2007 was 5.36% for both the $960 million swaps and the $300 million swaps.
Redemption of 87¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes
In February 2006, the Company called for the redemption of its $175 million 87¤8% senior subordinated notes. The redemption price was $1,044.38 per $1,000 principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and was made on March 15, 2006. The Company recorded a $10.0 million loss on early extinguishment of debt during the three months ended March 31, 2006 for the call premium and the write-off of the associated deferred financing fees. The Company funded the redemption of the notes from available cash and borrowings under its revolving credit facility.
67¤8% Senior Subordinated Notes
On December 4, 2003, the Company completed an offering of $200 million of 67¤8% senior subordinated notes that mature on December 1, 2011. Interest on the notes is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2004.
The Company may redeem all or part of the notes on or after December 1, 2007 at certain specified redemption prices.
The 67¤8% notes are general unsecured obligations and are guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by certain of the Companys current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The 67¤8% notes rank equally with the Companys future senior subordinated debt and junior to its senior debt, including debt under the Companys $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility. In addition, the 67¤8% notes will be effectively junior to any indebtedness of Penns non-U.S. Unrestricted Subsidiaries.
The 67¤8% notes and guarantees were originally issued in a private placement pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act). On August 27, 2004, the Company completed an offer to exchange the notes and guarantees for notes and guarantees registered under the Securities Act having substantially identical terms.
6 ¾% Senior Subordinated Notes
On March 9, 2005, the Company completed an offering of $250 million of 63¤4% senior subordinated notes that mature on March 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2005. The 63¤4% notes are general unsecured obligations and are not guaranteed by the Companys subsidiaries. The 63¤4% notes were issued in a private placement pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Other Long-Term Obligations
On October 15, 2004, the Company announced the sale of The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries to the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the MTGA). Under the terms of the agreement, the MTGA acquired The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Pocono Downs (a standardbred horse racing facility located on 400 acres in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania) and five Pennsylvania off-track wagering facilities located in Carbondale, East Stroudsburg, Erie, Hazelton and the Lehigh Valley (Allentown). The sale agreement also provided the MTGA with certain post-closing termination rights in the event of certain materially adverse legislative or regulatory events. In January 2005, the Company received $280 million from the MTGA and transferred the operations of The Downs Racing, Inc. and its subsidiaries to the MTGA. The sale was not considered final for accounting purposes until the third quarter of 2006, as the MTGA had certain post-closing termination rights that remained outstanding. On August 7, 2006, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the Purchase Agreement and Release of Claims (Amendment and Release) with the MTGA pertaining to the October 14, 2004 Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) and agreed to pay the MTGA an aggregate of $30 million over five years, beginning on the first anniversary of the commencement of slot operations at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, in exchange for the MTGAs agreement to release various claims it raised against the Company under the Purchase Agreement and the MTGAs surrender of all post-closing termination rights it might have had under the Purchase Agreement. The Company recorded the present value of the $30 million liability within debt, as the amount due to the MTGA is payable over five years, with the first payment to occur in November 2007.
14
Covenants
The Companys $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, $200 million 67/8% and $250 million 63¤4% senior subordinated notes require it, among other obligations, to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial tests, including fixed charge coverage, senior leverage and total leverage ratios. In addition, the Companys $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, $200 million 67/8% and $250 million 63¤4% senior subordinated notes restrict, among other things, the Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, amend debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, make capital expenditures, or engage in certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates and otherwise restricts corporate activities.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company made certain amendments to its $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, including the modification of the applicable covenants to enable the Company to repurchase up to $200 million of its equity or debt securities, the modification of the Companys capital expenditure covenant to increase certain permitted expenditures consistent with the Companys development and expansion projects, and the modification of the Companys collateral documents in accordance with requirements of the Pennsylvania gaming authorities.
At March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all required covenants.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is subject to various legal and administrative proceedings relating to personal injuries, employment matters, commercial transactions and other matters arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the final outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Company maintains what it believes is adequate insurance coverage to further mitigate the risks of such proceedings. However, such proceedings can be costly, time consuming and unpredictable and, therefore, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of such proceedings may not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Further, no assurance can be given that the amount or scope of existing insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover losses arising from such matters.
The following proceedings could result in costs, settlements, damages, or rulings that materially impact the Companys consolidated financial condition or operating results. In each instance, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses, claims and/or counter-claims, and intends to vigorously defend itself or pursue its claim.
In November 2005, Capital Seven, LLC and Shawn A. Scott (collectively, Capital Seven), the sellers of Bangor Historic Track, Inc. (BHT), filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association seeking $30 million plus interest and other damages. Capital Seven alleges a breach of contract by the Company based on the Companys payment of a $51 million purchase price for the purchase of BHT instead of an alleged $81 million purchase price Capital Seven claims is due under the purchase agreement. The parties had agreed that the purchase price of BHT would be determined, in part, by the applicable gaming taxes imposed by Maine on the Companys operations, and currently are disputing the effective tax rate. Pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures, the Company deposited $30 million in escrow, pending a resolution. This amount is included in other assets within the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The parties have completed their selection of arbitrators and have commenced discovery.
In conjunction with the Companys acquisition of Argosy, and subsequent disposition of the Argosy Casino Baton Rouge property, the Company became responsible for litigation initiated over eight years ago related to the Baton Rouge property formerly owned by Argosy. On November 26, 1997, Capitol House filed an amended petition in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish, State of Louisiana, amending its previously filed but unserved suit against Richard Perryman, the person selected by the Louisiana Gaming Division to evaluate and rank the applicants seeking a gaming license for East Baton Rouge Parish, and adding state law claims against Jazz Enterprises, Inc., the former Jazz Enterprises, Inc. shareholders, Argosy, Argosy of Louisiana, Inc. and Catfish Queen Partnership in Commendam, d/b/a the Belle of Baton Rouge Casino. This suit alleges that these parties violated the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act in connection with obtaining the gaming license that was issued to Jazz Enterprises, Inc./Catfish Queen Partnership in Commendam. The plaintiff, an applicant for a gaming license whose application was denied by the Louisiana Gaming Division, seeks to prove that the gaming license was invalidly issued and seeks to recover lost gaming revenues that the plaintiff contends it could have earned if the gaming license had been properly issued to the plaintiff. On October 2, 2006, the Company prevailed on a partial summary judgment motion which limited plaintiffs damages to its out-of-pocket costs in
15
seeking its gaming license, thereby eliminating any recovery for potential lost gaming profits. On February 6, 2007, the jury returned a verdict of $3.8 million (exclusive of statutory interest and attorney fees) against Jazz Enterprises, Inc. and Argosy. Pursuant to the verdict, the Company established an appropriate reserve at December 31, 2006. The Companys post-trial motions which seek to overturn the verdict are scheduled for a September 10, 2007 hearing. The Company has the right to seek indemnification from two of the former Jazz Enterprises, Inc. shareholders for any liability suffered as a result of such cause of action, however, there can be no assurance that the former Jazz Enterprises, Inc. shareholders will have assets sufficient to satisfy any claim in excess of Argosys recoupment rights.
In May 2006, the Illinois Legislature passed into law House Bill 1918, effective May 26, 2006, which singled out four of the nine Illinois casinos, including the Companys Empress Casino Hotel and Hollywood Casino Aurora, for a 3% tax surcharge to subsidize local horse racing interests. On May 30, 2006, Empress Casino Hotel and Hollywood Casino Aurora joined with the two other riverboats affected by the law, Harrahs Joliet and the Grand Victoria Casino in Elgin, and filed suit in the Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial District in Will County, Illinois (the Court), asking the Court to declare the law unconstitutional. The casinos began paying the 3% tax surcharge into a protest fund which accrues interest during the pendency of the lawsuit. The accumulated funds will be returned to the casinos if they prevail in the lawsuit. In two orders dated March 29, 2007 and April 20, 2007, the Court declared the law unconstitutional under the Uniformity Clause of the Illinois Constitution and enjoined the collection of this tax surcharge. The State of Illinois requested, and was granted, a stay of this ruling. As a result, the casinos will continue paying the 3% tax surcharge into the protest fund until a final order has been entered in the case. The State of Illinois has filed its notice of appeal of the ruling to the Illinois Supreme Court. The Company anticipates the appeal will take several months before a final ruling is reached on this matter.
In October 2002, in response to the Companys plans to relocate the river barge underlying the Boomtown Biloxi casino to an adjacent property, Raphael Skrmetta, the lessor of the property on which the Boomtown Biloxi casino conducts a portion of its dockside operations, filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi seeking a declaratory judgment that (i) the Company must use the leased premises for a gaming use or, in the alternative, (ii) after the move, the Company will remain obligated to make the revenue-based rent payments to plaintiff set forth in the lease. The plaintiff filed this suit immediately after the Mississippi Gaming Commission approved the Companys request to relocate the barge. The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have also approved the Companys plan to relocate the barge. In March 2004, the trial court ruled in favor of the Company on all counts. The plaintiff appealed the decision to the Fifth Circuit, which upheld the tenants right to relocate but remanded the case to the trial court because there was insufficient evidence in the record to determine whether the casino barge would be relocated to a place which would trigger the increased rent obligation under the lease. Mr. Skrmetta has since transferred his interest in the property to Skrmetta MS, LLC. On March 23, 2007, BTN, Inc. (BTN), one of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into an amended and restated ground lease (the Amended Lease) with Skrmetta MS, LLC. The lease amends the prior ground lease, dated October 19, 1993. The Amended Lease requires BTN to maintain a minimum gaming operation on the leased premises and to pay rent equal to 5% of adjusted gaming win after gaming taxes have been deducted. The term of the Amended Lease expires on January 1, 2093. The lessor will subsequently purchase property owned by BTN and certain other of our wholly-owned subsidiaries in the vicinity of Boomtown Biloxi casino for $12.8 million. As a result of the execution of the Amended Lease, all litigation between the lessor and BTN will be dismissed.
Operating Lease Commitments
The Company is liable under numerous operating leases for airplanes, automobiles, land for the property on which some of its casinos operate, other equipment and buildings, which expire at various dates through 2093. Total rental expense under these agreements was $8.1 million and $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The leases for land consist of annual base lease rent payments, plus a percentage rent based on a percent of adjusted gaming wins, as described in the respective leases.
The Company has an operating lease with the City of Bangor for a permanent facility which the Company expects to open in the third quarter of 2008, at a budgeted cost of $131 million. This permanent facility is subject to a percentage rent equaling 3% of gross slot revenue. The lease is for an initial term of fifteen years, with three ten-year renewal options. The initial term begins with the opening of the permanent facility. An agreement with the City of Bangor calls for a two-year rent moratorium for 2006 and 2007.
On March 23, 2007, BTN, one of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into an Amended Lease with Skrmetta MS, LLC. The lease amends the prior ground lease, dated October 19, 1993. The Amended Lease requires BTN to maintain a minimum gaming operation on the leased premises and to pay rent equal to 5% of adjusted gaming win after gaming taxes have been deducted. The term of the Amended Lease expires on January 1, 2093.
16
The future minimum lease commitments relating to the base lease rent portion of noncancelable operating leases at March 31, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
Within one year |
|
$ |
8,995 |
|
1-3 Years |
|
14,608 |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
10,919 |
|
|
Over 5 years |
|
31,174 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,696 |
|
Capital Expenditure Commitments
At March 31, 2007, the Company is contractually committed to spend approximately $168.8 million in capital expenditures for projects in progress.
9. Stock-Based Compensation
In April 1994, the Companys Board of Directors and shareholders adopted and approved the 1994 Stock Option Plan (the 1994 Plan). The 1994 Plan permitted the grant of options to purchase up to 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to antidilution adjustments, at a price per share no less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date an option is granted with respect to incentive stock options only. The price would be no less than 110% of fair market value in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any individual who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding stock. The 1994 Plan provided for the granting of both incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and nonqualified stock options, which do not so qualify. The 1994 Plan terminated in April 2004, but options granted prior to the 1994 Plans termination remain outstanding.
On April 16, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors adopted and approved the 2003 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2003 Plan). On May 22, 2003, the Companys shareholders approved the 2003 Plan. The 2003 Plan was effective June 1, 2003 and permits the grant of options to purchase Common Stock and other market-based and performance-based awards. Up to 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock are available for awards under the 2003 Plan. The 2003 Plan provides for the granting of both incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and nonqualified stock options, which do not so qualify. The exercise price per share may be no less than (i) 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date an option is granted for incentive stock options and (ii) 85% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date an option is granted for nonqualified stock options. Unless this plan is extended, no awards shall be granted or exchanges effected under this plan after May 31, 2013. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were 3,226,975 and 4,182,600 options available for future grants under the 2003 Plan, respectively.
Stock options that expire between January 2, 2008 and January 2, 2017 have been granted to officers, directors and employees to purchase Common Stock at prices ranging from $2.58 to $44.01 per share. All options were granted at the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the options were granted.
The following table contains information on stock options issued under the plans for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
17
|
|
Number of Option |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
7,733,814 |
|
$ |
17.09 |
|
5.34 |
|
$ |
122,844 |
|
Granted |
|
1,416,500 |
|
33.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(939,838 |
) |
9.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
8,210,476 |
|
$ |
20.74 |
|
5.55 |
|
$ |
176,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
2,817,601 |
|
$ |
13.38 |
|
4.30 |
|
$ |
81,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
8,110,601 |
|
$ |
21.87 |
|
4.97 |
|
$ |
160,225 |
|
Granted |
|
1,381,250 |
|
41.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(408,659 |
) |
12.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Canceled |
|
(436,625 |
) |
28.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
8,646,567 |
|
$ |
25.15 |
|
5.22 |
|
$ |
150,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
4,120,167 |
|
$ |
17.67 |
|
4.17 |
|
$ |
102,545 |
|
Included in the above are common stock options that were issued in 2003 to the Companys Chairman outside of the 1994 Plan and the 2003 Plan. These options were issued at $7.95 per share, and are exercisable through February 6, 2013. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the number of these common stock options that were outstanding was 23,750. In addition, the Company issued 160,000 restricted stock awards in 2004, which fully vest in May 2009, and issued 280,000 restricted stock awards in 2006, which fully vest by 2011. The restricted stock grants in 2004 and 2006 were made pursuant to the 2003 Plan. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $15.85 and $14.64, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $13.4 million and $26.9 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2007:
|
Exercise Price Range |
|
Total |
|
|||||||||
|
|
$2.58 to |
|
$14.56 to |
|
$33.17 to |
|
$2.58 to |
|
||||
|
|
$12.15 |
|
$33.12 |
|
$44.01 |
|
$44.01 |
|
||||
Outstanding options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Number outstanding |
|
2,928,736 |
|
3,891,478 |
|
1,826,353 |
|
8,646,567 |
|
||||
Weighted-average remaining contractual life (years) |
|
3.37 |
|
5.74 |
|
7.10 |
|
5.22 |
|
||||
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
9.97 |
|
$ |
29.69 |
|
$ |
39.85 |
|
$ |
25.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Exercisable options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Number outstanding |
|
2,439,736 |
|
1,658,228 |
|
22,203 |
|
4,120,167 |
|
||||
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
$ |
29.26 |
|
$ |
35.02 |
|
$ |
17.67 |
|
Compensation costs related to stock-based compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $6.6 million pre-tax ($4.8 million after-tax) and $4.9 million pre-tax ($3.5 million after-tax), respectively, and are included within the consolidated statements of income under general and administrative expense.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized equaled $58.8 million and $45.2 million, respectively, including $52.1 million and $38.0 million for stock options,
18
respectively, and $6.7 million and $7.2 million for restricted stock, respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting periods, which will not exceed five years.
10. Subsidiary Guarantors
Under the terms of the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, all of the Companys subsidiaries are guarantors under the agreement, with the exception of several minor subsidiaries with total assets of $97.4 million (approximately 2% of total assets at March 31, 2007). Each of the subsidiary guarantors is 100% owned by Penn. In addition, the guarantees provided by the Companys subsidiaries under the terms of the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility are full and unconditional, joint and several, and Penn has no significant independent assets and no independent operations at, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2007. There are no significant restrictions within the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility on the Companys ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan. However, in certain jurisdictions, the gaming authorities may impose restrictions pursuant to the authority granted to them with regard to the Companys ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries.
With regard to the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, the Company has not presented condensed consolidating balance sheets, condensed consolidating statements of income and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows at, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2007 and 2006, as Penn had no significant independent assets and no independent operations at, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2007, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and any subsidiaries of the parent company other than the subsidiary guarantors are considered minor.
Under the terms of the $200 million 67/8% senior subordinated notes, all of the Companys subsidiaries are guarantors under the agreement, with the exception of several minor subsidiaries with total assets of $89.1 million (approximately 2% of total assets at March 31, 2007). Each of the subsidiary guarantors is 100% owned by Penn. In addition, the guarantees provided by the Companys subsidiaries under the terms of the $200 million 67/8% senior subordinated notes are full and unconditional, joint and several, and Penn had no significant independent assets and no independent operations at, and for the three months ended March 31, 2007. There are no significant restrictions within the $200 million 67/8% senior subordinated notes on the Companys ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan. However, in certain jurisdictions, the gaming authorities may impose restrictions pursuant to the authority granted to them with regard to the Companys ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries.
With regard to the $200 million 67/8% senior subordinated notes, the Company has not presented condensed consolidating balance sheets, condensed consolidating statements of income and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows at, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2007 and 2006, as Penn had no significant independent assets and no independent operations at, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2007, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and any subsidiaries of the parent company other than the subsidiary guarantors are considered minor.
11. Subsequent Events
On April 16, 2007, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2006 among Zia Partners, LLC (Zia), Zia Park LLC (the Buyer), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and (solely with respect to specified sections thereof which relate to the Companys guarantee of the Buyers payment and performance) the Company, the Buyer completed the acquisition of the Black Gold Casino and Zia Park Racetrack and all related assets of Zia for a purchase price of $200 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment and certain other adjustments, as well as the assumption of specified liabilities of Zia. The Company funded this purchase with additional borrowings under its existing $750 million revolving credit facility.
On April 30, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of the Companys common stock, contingent on shareholder approval of the 2007 Employees Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Company (the 2007 Equity Compensation Plans). The repurchase program will authorize the Company to purchase, in open market or privately negotiated transactions, Company shares in amounts equivalent to options or other equity awards settled in stock issued pursuant to the 2007 Equity Compensation Plans within 120 days of such option or other award issuance, subject to applicable legal requirements and appropriate market conditions, as required by the 2007 Equity Compensation Plans. Further, in conjunction with shareholder approval of the 2007 Equity Compensation Plans, any future grants of options and other equity awards settled in stock under previously approved long-term incentive plans will also be subject to this repurchase program.
19
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Our Operations
We are a leading, diversified, multi-jurisdictional owner and operator of gaming and pari-mutuel properties. We currently own or operate eighteen facilities in fourteen jurisdictions, including Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ontario. We believe that our portfolio of assets provides us with a diversified cash flow from operations.
We have made significant acquisitions in the past five years, and expect to continue to pursue additional acquisition and development opportunities in the future. On March 3, 2003, we acquired Hollywood Casino Corporation, which significantly increased our revenues and cash flow. On February 12, 2004, we purchased Bangor Historic Track, Inc., in Bangor, Maine. On October 3, 2005, we completed our largest acquisition to date, acquiring Argosy Gaming Company (Argosy). In early November 2005, we opened a temporary gaming facility in Bangor, Maine. On July 5, 2004, Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell signed into law the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act. We are developing a completely new gaming and racing facility at our Penn National Race Course in Grantville, Pennsylvania, which we expect to open with 2,000 slot machines around the first quarter of 2008 at an estimated cost of $310 million, inclusive of the $50 million gaming license fee, with the ability to add 1,000 machines as soon as demand warrants. We have a master plan to accommodate up to 5,000 gaming devices, based on demand. In late December 2006, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (the PGCB) granted us a Category 1 slot machine license for the placement of slot machines at our planned Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course. On April 16, 2007, we completed the acquisition of the Black Gold Casino and Zia Park Racetrack, located in Hobbs, New Mexico.
The vast majority of our revenues is gaming revenue, derived primarily from gaming on slot machines and, to a lesser extent, table games. Other revenues are derived from our management service fee from Casino Rama, our hotel, dining, retail, admissions, program sales, concessions and certain other ancillary activities, and our racing operations. Our racing revenue is derived from wagering on our live races, wagering on import simulcasts at our racetracks and off-track wagering facilities (OTWs) and through account wagering, and fees from wagering on export simulcasting of our races.
We intend to continue to expand our gaming operations through the implementation of a disciplined capital expenditure program at our existing properties and the continued pursuit of strategic acquisitions of gaming properties, particularly in attractive regional markets.
Key performance indicators related to revenues are:
· Gaming revenue indicatorsslot handle (volume indicator), table game drop (volume indicator) and win or hold percentages. Our typical property slot win percentage is in the range of 6% to 10% of slot handle and our typical table games win percentage is in the range of 15% to 25% of table game drop; and
· Racing revenue indicatorspari-mutuel wagering commissions (volume indicator) earned on wagering on our live races, wagering on import simulcasts at our racetracks and OTWs and through account wagering, and fees from wagering on export simulcasting of our races at out-of-state locations.
Our properties generate significant operating cash flow, since most of our revenue is cash-based from slot machines and pari-mutuel wagering. Our business is capital intensive, and we rely on cash flow from our properties to generate operating cash to repay debt, fund capital maintenance expenditures, fund new capital projects at existing properties and provide excess cash for future development and acquisitions.
20
Executive Summary
Factors affecting our results for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, included revenue growth at several of our properties and contributions from our two Gulf Coast facilities, which were closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006. These increases were partially offset by the previously anticipated decline at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge, the impact of increased insurance costs, the incremental Illinois tax at our Chicagoland facilities, pre-opening costs related to the new Argosy Casino Riverside hotel and the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course and costs associated with the closing of two of our off-track wagering facilities.
Highlights for the quarter:
· Net revenues increased $48.5 million, or 8.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to revenue growth at several of our properties, including Hollywood Casino Aurora, the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, Argosy Casino Riverside, and Hollywood Slots at Bangor, and contributions from our two Gulf Coast facilities which were closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006, all of which was partially offset by the previously anticipated decline at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge attributable to hurricane recovery and stabilization.
· Net income and income from operations before income taxes increased by 2.3% and 7.6%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
· On August 8, 2006, we renewed our property insurance coverage in the amount of $200 million. The $200 million coverage is all risk, including named windstorm, flood and earthquake. Also, we purchased an additional $250 million of all risk coverage that is subject to certain exclusions including, among others, exclusion for named windstorms, floods and earthquakes. There is a $25 million deductible for named windstorm events, and lesser deductibles as they apply to other perils. The premium for this coverage was $6.3 million higher during the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
· In May 2006, the Illinois Legislature passed into law House Bill 1918, which singled out four of the nine Illinois casinos, including our Empress Casino Hotel and Hollywood Casino Aurora, for a 3% tax surcharge to subsidize local horse racing interests. We began paying this tax surcharge during the three months ended June 30, 2006, and have subsequently expensed approximately $13.3 million in incremental tax, including $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007. On May 30, 2006, Empress Casino Hotel and Hollywood Casino Aurora joined with the two other riverboats affected by the law, and filed suit in the Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial District in Will County, Illinois (the Court), asking the Court to declare the law unconstitutional. The State of Illinois agreed to the entry of an order that established a protest fund for all of the tax surcharge payments and enjoined the Treasurer from making any payments out of that fund pending the final outcome of the litigation. In two orders dated March 29, 2007 and April 20, 2007, the Court declared the law unconstitutional under the Uniformity Clause of the Illinois Constitution and enjoined the collection of this tax surcharge. While the Illinois Attorney General has appealed the decision, the four impacted properties remain steadfast in their intention to overturn the legislation and, should we prevail, the incremental taxes paid under protest will be refunded.
Other Developments:
· On April 16, 2007, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2006 among Zia Partners, LLC (Zia), Zia Park LLC (the Buyer), one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and (solely with respect to specified sections thereof which relate to our guarantee of the Buyers payment and performance) us, the Buyer completed the acquisition of the Black Gold Casino and Zia Park Racetrack and all related assets of Zia for a purchase price of $200 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment and certain other adjustments, as well as the assumption of specified liabilities of Zia. We funded this purchase with additional borrowings under our existing $750 million revolving credit facility.
· On March 23, 2007, BTN, Inc. (BTN), one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into an amended and restated ground lease (the Amended Lease) with Skrmetta MS, LLC. The lease amends the prior ground lease, dated October 19, 1993. The Amended Lease requires BTN to maintain a minimum gaming operation on the leased premises and to pay rent equal to 5% of adjusted gaming win after gaming taxes have been deducted. Total rent expense for BTN under the Amended Lease was $0.6 million lower during the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the total rent expense under the prior ground lease during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The term of the Amended Lease expires on January 1, 2093. The lessor will subsequently purchase property owned by BTN and certain other of our wholly-owned subsidiaries in the vicinity of Boomtown Biloxi casino for $12.8 million. As a result of the execution of the Amended Lease, all litigation between the lessor and BTN
21
will be dismissed.
· On March 21, 2007, the Governor of West Virginia signed into law the West Virginia Lottery Racetrack Table Games Act, which allows the four existing horse and dog tracks in West Virginia to offer table games, subject to local voter approval. All four counties that have racetracks will hold table game referendum votes on June 9, 2007. Our efforts and funding of this referendum campaign will reduce our earnings on a short-term basis. On May 4, 2007, the West Virginia Family Foundation, Inc. filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the West Virginia Lottery Racetrack Table Games Act, on the grounds that the West Virginia Constitution prohibits the legislature from enacting laws that authorize lotteries unless they are owned and operated by the State.
· On January 22, 2007, we completed a claim settlement agreement (the Claim Settlement Agreement) with Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, Arch Insurance Company, Everest Reinsurance (Bermuda) Ltd., Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company, U.S. Fire Insurance Company, XL Insurance Company Ltd., HCC International Insurance Co. PLC (Houston Casualty) and certain underwriters at Lloyds (together, the Insurers) with respect to the business interruption and property damage claims under our all-risk property insurance program resulting from Hurricane Katrinas impact on our Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi properties (the Hurricane Katrina Claims). Pursuant to the Claim Settlement Agreement, which had an effective date of December 31, 2006, the Insurers paid us an aggregate of $100 million in January 2007, which is in addition to the $125 million in reimbursements that we previously received from the Insurers in connection with the Hurricane Katrina Claims, and both we and the Insurers agreed to release each other from, and covenanted not to sue each other regarding, any other claims arising from the Hurricane Katrina catastrophe.
· We are continuing to build and develop several of our properties, including the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg, Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course and Hollywood Slots at Bangor. All of our development and expansion projects remain on track with our previously disclosed timetables and budgets. Additional information regarding our capital projects is discussed in detail in the subsection entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources Capital Expenditures below.
Critical Accounting Policies
We make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions when applying accounting principles in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The nature of the estimates and assumptions are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain factors or the susceptibility of such factors to change. We have identified the policies related to the accounting for long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes and litigation, claims and assessments as critical accounting policies, which require us to make significant judgments, estimates and assumptions.
We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, and in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
The development and selection of the critical accounting policies, and the related disclosures, have been reviewed with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Long-lived assets
At March 31, 2007, we had a net property and equipment balance of $1,404.7 million within the consolidated balance sheet, representing 31% of total assets. We depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives are determined based on the nature of the assets as well as our current operating strategy. We review the carrying value of our property and equipment for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable based on undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. The factors considered by us in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. In estimating expected future cash flows for determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the individual property level. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property and equipment, we must make assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment loss for these assets. Such an impairment loss would be calculated
22
based upon the discounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset, and would be recognized as a non-cash component of operating income.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
At March 31, 2007, we had $1,866.5 million in goodwill and $775.4 million in other intangible assets within the consolidated balance sheet, representing 41% and 17% of total assets, respectively, resulting from our acquisition of other businesses. Two issues arise with respect to these assets that require significant management estimates and judgment: (i) the valuation in connection with the initial purchase price allocation; and (ii) the ongoing evaluation for impairment.
In connection with our acquisitions, valuations were completed to determine the allocation of the purchase prices. The factors considered in the valuations included data gathered as a result of our due diligence in connection with the acquisitions and projections for future operations. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment by comparing the fair value of the recorded assets to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), we consider our gaming license and trademark intangible assets as indefinite-life intangible assets that do not require amortization. Rather, these intangible assets are tested at least annually for impairment by comparing the fair value of the recorded assets to their carrying amount. If the carrying amounts of the gaming license and trademark intangible assets exceed their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. The annual evaluation of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets requires the use of estimates about future operating results of each reporting unit to determine their estimated fair value. Changes in forecasted operations can materially affect these estimates. Once an impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-life intangible assets has been recorded, it cannot be reversed. Because our goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are not amortized, there may be volatility in reported income because impairment losses, if any, are likely to occur irregularly and in varying amounts. Intangible assets that have a definite-life, including the management service contract for Casino Rama, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or related service contract. We review the carrying value of our intangible assets that have a definite-life for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the intangible assets that have a definite-life exceed their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and are measured at the prevailing enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences are settled or realized. SFAS 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The realizability of the deferred tax assets is evaluated quarterly by assessing the valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of the allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. We have used tax-planning strategies to realize or renew net deferred tax assets in order to avoid the potential loss of future tax benefits.
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 created a single model to address uncertainty in tax positions, and clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109 by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in an enterprises financial statements. FIN 48 also provided guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $11.9 million, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is included in noncurrent tax liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007.
In addition, we operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject to audit in each jurisdiction. These audits can involve complex issues that may require an extended period of time to resolve. In our opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all periods.
23
Litigation, claims and assessments
We utilize estimates for litigation, claims and assessments. These estimates are based on our knowledge and experience regarding current and past events, as well as assumptions about future events. If our assessment of such a matter should change, we may have to change the estimate, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Results of Operations
The following are the most important factors and trends that contribute to our operating performance:
· The fact that most of our properties operate in mature competitive markets. As a result, we expect a majority of our future growth to come from prudent acquisitions of gaming properties, jurisdictional expansions (such as in Pennsylvania and Maine) and property expansion in under-penetrated markets (such as at our Charles Town and Lawrenceburg properties).
· The continued pressure on governments to balance their budgets could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes.
· The fact that a number of states are currently considering or implementing legislation to legalize or expand gaming. Such legislation presents both potential opportunities to establish new properties (for instance, in Kansas and Ohio) and potential competitive threats to business at our existing properties (such as Kansas, Maryland, Ohio, and Kentucky). The timing and occurrence of these events remain uncertain. Legalized gaming from casinos located on Native American lands can also have a significant competitive effect.
· The continued demand for, and our emphasis on, slot wagering entertainment at our properties.
· The ongoing successful expansion and revenue gains at our Charles Town Entertainment Complex, Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg, Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, Hollywood Slots at Bangor and Argosy Casino Riverside facilities.
· Financing in a favorable interest rate environment and under an improved credit profile that facilitates our growth.
· The impact of Hurricane Katrina on our future insurance rates and the Mississippi Gulf Coast market.
· The successful execution of the development and construction activities currently underway at a number of our facilities, as well as the risks associated with the costs, regulatory approval, and the timing for these activities.
24
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gaming |
|
$ |
549,093 |
|
$ |
503,450 |
|
Management service fee |
|
3,474 |
|
4,387 |
|
||
Food, beverage and other |
|
73,770 |
|
66,135 |
|
||
Gross revenues |
|
626,337 |
|
573,972 |
|
||
Less promotional allowances |
|
(30,079 |
) |
(26,170 |
) |
||
Net revenues |
|
596,258 |
|
547,802 |
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gaming |
|
284,291 |
|
255,585 |
|
||
Food, beverage and other |
|
58,330 |
|
53,672 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
93,499 |
|
79,926 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
35,358 |
|
29,718 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
471,478 |
|
418,901 |
|
||
Income from operations |
|
$ |
124,780 |
|
$ |
128,901 |
|
25
The results of operations by property for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below:
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
Income (loss) from Operations |
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Charles Town Entertainment Complex |
|
$ |
119,596 |
|
$ |
116,917 |
|
$ |
30,723 |
|
$ |
29,490 |
|
Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg |
|
121,858 |
|
120,162 |
|
37,414 |
|
36,146 |
|
||||
Hollywood Casino Aurora |
|
64,500 |
|
61,750 |
|
18,332 |
|
19,215 |
|
||||
Empress Casino Hotel |
|
59,613 |
|
60,317 |
|
10,601 |
|
13,399 |
|
||||
Argosy Casino Riverside |
|
41,715 |
|
38,995 |
|
10,007 |
|
10,234 |
|
||||
Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge |
|
34,881 |
|
43,120 |
|
12,587 |
|
18,117 |
|
||||
Argosy Casino Alton |
|
30,863 |
|
29,519 |
|
6,756 |
|
5,441 |
|
||||
Hollywood Casino Tunica |
|
26,596 |
|
28,159 |
|
5,004 |
|
5,831 |
|
||||
Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis |
|
23,484 |
|
22 |
|
1,239 |
|
(156 |
) |
||||
Argosy Casino Sioux City |
|
14,117 |
|
14,051 |
|
3,522 |
|
3,827 |
|
||||
Boomtown Biloxi |
|
24,067 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
||||
Hollywood Slots at Bangor |
|
10,976 |
|
8,710 |
|
2,058 |
|
1,333 |
|
||||
Bullwhackers |
|
7,131 |
|
6,586 |
|
136 |
|
106 |
|
||||
Casino Rama management service contract |
|
3,474 |
|
4,387 |
|
3,188 |
|
4,068 |
|
||||
Pennsylvania Racing Operations |
|
11,854 |
|
13,087 |
|
(2,115 |
) |
645 |
|
||||
Raceway Park |
|
1,533 |
|
2,020 |
|
(247 |
) |
21 |
|
||||
Corporate overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
(19,983 |
) |
(18,816 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
596,258 |
|
$ |
547,802 |
|
$ |
124,780 |
|
$ |
128,901 |
|
26
Revenues
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Variance |
|
Variance |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gaming |
|
$ |
549,093 |
|
$ |
503,450 |
|
$ |
45,643 |
|
9.1 |
% |
Management service fee |
|
3,474 |
|
4,387 |
|
(913 |
) |
(20.8 |
)% |
|||
Food, beverage and other |
|
73,770 |
|
66,135 |
|
7,635 |
|
11.5 |
% |
|||
Gross revenue |
|
626,337 |
|
573,972 |
|
52,365 |
|
9.1 |
% |
|||
Less promotional allowances |
|
(30,079 |
) |
(26,170 |
) |
(3,909 |
) |
14.9 |
% |
|||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
596,258 |
|
$ |
547,802 |
|
$ |
48,456 |
|
8.8 |
% |
Gaming revenue
Gaming revenue increased by $45.6 million, or 9.1%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to revenue growth at several of our properties, including Hollywood Casino Aurora, the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, Argosy Casino Riverside, and Hollywood Slots at Bangor, as well as the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi. These increases were partially offset by the previously anticipated decline at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge.
Gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino Aurora increased by $2.7 million primarily as a result of the continued refinement of marketing programs, increases to the incentives offered to existing customers, increases in slot handle, rated play and patron counts, and good weather in March 2007.
Gaming revenue at Charles Town Entertainment Complex increased by $2.1 million primarily due to an increase in average spend per player trip and the facilitys marketing campaigns. Win per unit per day and total average gaming machines on the floor were $302 and 4,121, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $294 and 4,135 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Gaming revenue at Argosy Casino Riverside increased by $2.5 million due to successful marketing promotions and increased traffic on the property due to hotel opening-related activities.
Gaming revenue at Hollywood Slots at Bangor increased by $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 primarily due to the addition of new types of gaming machines as part of the continued introduction of Hollywood Slots at Bangor and increased penetration of the market.
Gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $21.2 million and $22.5 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge decreased by $8.2 million primarily as a result of hurricane recovery and stabilization.
Management service fee
Management service fees from Casino Rama decreased by $0.9 million, or 20.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the impact of the Ontario smoking ban that was effective May 31, 2006, as well as the weather conditions experienced in the three months ended March 31, 2007.
27
Food, beverage and other revenue
Food, beverage and other revenue increased by $7.6 million, or 11.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, offset by decreases in food, beverage and other revenue at both our Pennsylvania Racing Operations and Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg.
Food, beverage and other revenue at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $5.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Food, beverage and other revenue decreased by $1.3 million at our Pennsylvania Racing Operations as we, in preparation for the construction of the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, closed and razed the aged grandstand and clubhouse at Penn National Race Course in the second quarter of 2006 and opened a smaller temporary facility.
Food, beverage and other revenue at Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg decreased by $1.9 million due to the decision made in February 2006 to cease charging admission fees altogether, the majority of which had been provided to guests without charge as promotional allowances.
Promotional allowances
Promotional allowances increased by $3.9 million, or 14.9%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, partially offset by a decrease in promotional allowances at Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg.
Promotional allowances at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $3.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Promotional allowances at Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg decreased by $2.2 million due to the decision made in February 2006 to cease charging admission fees altogether, the majority of which had been provided to guests without charge as promotional allowances.
28
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Variance |
|
Variance |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gaming |
|
$ |
284,291 |
|
$ |
255,585 |
|
$ |
28,706 |
|
11.2 |
% |
Food, beverage and other |
|
58,330 |
|
53,672 |
|
4,658 |
|
8.7 |
% |
|||
General and administrative |
|
93,499 |
|
79,926 |
|
13,573 |
|
17.0 |
% |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
35,358 |
|
29,718 |
|
5,640 |
|
19.0 |
% |
|||
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
471,478 |
|
$ |
418,901 |
|
$ |
52,577 |
|
12.6 |
% |
Gaming expense
Gaming expense increased by $28.7 million, or 11.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, the continued introduction of Hollywood Slots at Bangor and payment of the 3% Illinois tax surcharge by two of our properties.
Gaming expense at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $11.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Gaming expense at the Hollywood Slots at Bangor temporary facility increased by $1.2 million as a result of an increase in taxes resulting from higher gaming revenue.
Gaming expense at Empress Casino Hotel increased by $2.7 million primarily due to payment of $1.9 million for the 3% Illinois tax surcharge and increased marketing expenses.
Gaming expense at Hollywood Casino Aurora increased by $2.7 million primarily due to payment of $2.1 million for the 3% Illinois tax surcharge as well as an increase in taxes resulting from higher gaming revenue.
Food, beverage and other expense
Food, beverage and other expense increased by $4.7 million, or 8.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi and the completion of the new hotel at Argosy Casino Riverside.
Food, beverage and other expense increased by $1.7 million at both Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Food, beverage and other expense increased by $1.0 million at Argosy Casino Riverside due to pre-opening costs related to the Argosy Casino Riverside hotel, which opened in March 2007.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expense increased by $13.6 million, or 17.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006. General and administrative expense at the properties includes expenses such as compliance, facility maintenance, utilities, property and liability insurance, surveillance and security, and certain housekeeping, as well as all expenses for administrative departments such as accounting, purchasing, human resources, legal and internal audit.
29
General and administrative expense at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $6.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
General and administrative expense at Charles Town decreased by $1.3 million primarily due to a real estate tax adjustment.
Corporate overhead expense increased by $2.5 million primarily due to the costs incurred relating to the grant of equity-based compensation awards as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment having increased by $1.7 million, as additional equity-based compensation awards were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2007. We grant a substantial portion of our equity-based compensation awards during the first three months of the year.
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $5.6 million, or 19.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to incremental depreciation at the Charles Town Entertainment Complex and the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation at Empress Casino Hotel.
Depreciation and amortization expense at the Charles Town Entertainment Complex increased by $1.4 million due to incremental depreciation for assets placed into service subsequent to the three months ended March 31, 2006, including a 378-seat buffet and a new parking garage, which were completed in mid-2006.
Depreciation and amortization expense at Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi increased by $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, due to the reopening of Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis and Boomtown Biloxi, both of which had been closed during the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of extensive Hurricane Katrina damage. Boomtown Biloxi reopened on June 29, 2006 and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis reopened on August 31, 2006.
Depreciation and amortization expense at Empress Casino Hotel decreased by $1.1 million as depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2006 included adjustments associated with the October 2005 acquisition of Argosy.
30
Other income (expense)
Other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Variance |
|
Variance |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(48,347 |
) |
$ |
(48,429 |
) |
$ |
82 |
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
876 |
|
903 |
|
(27 |
) |
(3.0 |
)% |
|||
Earnings from joint venture |
|
40 |
|
413 |
|
(373 |
) |
(90.3 |
)% |
|||
Other |
|
(228 |
) |
(110 |
) |
(118 |
) |
107.3 |
% |
|||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
(10,022 |
) |
10,022 |
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|||
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
(47,659 |
) |
$ |
(57,245 |
) |
$ |
9,586 |
|
(16.7 |
)% |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
We recorded a $10.0 million loss on early extinguishment of debt during the three months ended March 31, 2006, as a result of the redemption of $175 million in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 87¤8% senior subordinated notes due March 15, 2010. As a result of the redemption, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $10.0 million for the call premium and the write-off of the associated deferred financing fees.
Taxes
The increase in our effective tax rate to 44.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 41.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2006, reflects the non-deductibility of permanent differences and our adoption of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been cash flow from operations, borrowings from banks and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $168.7 million and $83.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 included net income of $42.9 million, non-cash reconciling items, such as depreciation, amortization, and the charge for stock compensation of $49.3 million, and net changes in current asset and liability accounts of $76.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $124.5 million and $54.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 included expenditures for property and equipment totaling $74.2 million and acquisition of businesses and licenses, such as the Pennsylvania gaming license, totaling $51.1 million, both of which were partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment totaling $0.8 million.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $41.9 million and $24.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 included proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaling $5.0 million, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $113.0 million and the tax benefit from stock options exercised totaling $3.8 million, all of which were offset by principal payments on long-term debt totaling $149.5 million and $14.2 million in payments on insurance financing.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are accounted for as either capital project or capital maintenance (replacement) expenditures. Capital project expenditures are for fixed asset additions that expand an existing facility. Capital maintenance (replacement) expenditures are expenditures to replace existing fixed assets with a useful life greater than one year that are obsolete, worn out or no longer cost effective to repair.
31
The following table summarizes our capital project expenditures by property for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and actual expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2007, other than capital maintenance expenditures and Hurricane Katrina-related capital project expenditures at Boomtown Biloxi and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis:
Property |
|
Expected for Year |
|
Expenditures |
|
Balance to Expend |
|
|||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Charles Town Entertainment Complex |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course |
|
222.1 |
|
22.5 |
|
199.6 |
|
|||
Hollywood Slots at Bangor |
|
62.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
60.0 |
|
|||
Argosy Casino Riverside |
|
7.8 |
|
6.4 |
|
1.4 |
|
|||
Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg |
|
53.0 |
|
6.6 |
|
46.4 |
|
|||
Other |
|
22.0 |
|
0.8 |
|
21.2 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
408.0 |
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
$ |
351.1 |
|
At the Charles Town Entertainment Complex, we opened phase one of our latest expansion on April 20, 2007. With the additional gaming floor capacity, we installed 924 gaming machines, or 800 net new positions, bringing Charles Towns total count to approximately 5,000 units. Our next phase of development at Charles Town Entertainment Complex includes plans for additional gaming floor space to accommodate additional gaming machines or, if approved, table games, a 153-room hotel, and additional food and beverage offerings. The expected opening date of the hotel is 15 months from receipt of pending building permits, and the expected opening date of the second phase of gaming space is early 2008. We plan to spend an aggregate of $56 million on the project.
In late December 2006, the PGCB granted us a Category 1 slot machine license for the placement of slot machines at our planned Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course. In August 2006, we commenced construction of the integrated racing and gaming facility at Penn National Race Course. The Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course will be a 365,000 square foot facility, and will be sized for 2,000 slot machines, with the building size sufficient to add 1,000 additional machines. The Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course will also include a 2,500 space parking garage and several restaurants. The expected opening date is around the first quarter of 2008. We plan to spend an aggregate of $310 million on the project.
At the Hollywood Slots at Bangor, we are building a permanent facility, which will include a 1,500 slot facility (1,000 slot machines at opening), a 152-room hotel, 1,500 space parking garage and several restaurants. The expected opening date is the third quarter of 2008. We plan to spend an aggregate of $131 million on the project.
We recently opened Argosy Casino Riversides Mediterranean-themed, nine-story, 258-room hotel and spa to the public, generating significant local interest.
The expansion at Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg includes a 1,500 space parking garage, which is expected to open in the second quarter of 2008, a two-level 270,000 square foot riverboat, and numerous infrastructure upgrades to allow more convenient access to the property, which are expected to open in the second quarter of 2009. The new riverboat will allow up to 4,000 positions on one level and another 400 positions will be added to the second level, along with restaurants and other amenities on the gaming riverboat. We plan to spend an aggregate of $310 million on the project.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we spent approximately $2.7 million for Hurricane Katrina-related capital project expenditures at Boomtown Biloxi and Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we spent approximately $14.6 million for capital maintenance expenditures at our properties. The majority of the capital maintenance expenditures were for slot machines, slot machine equipment, and environmental work.
Cash generated from operations and cash available under the revolver portion of our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility funded our capital expenditure and capital maintenance expenditures in 2007.
32
Debt
Senior Secured Credit Facility
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we borrowed $113.0 million under our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, and made principal payments on our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility of $149.1 million, for activities arising in the normal course of business.
Covenants
Our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, $200 million 67/8% and $250 million 6¾% senior subordinated notes require us, among other obligations, to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial tests, including fixed charge coverage, senior leverage and total leverage ratios. In addition, our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, $200 million 67/8% and $250 million 6¾% senior subordinated notes restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, amend debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, make capital expenditures, or engage in certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates and otherwise restricts corporate activities.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we made certain amendments to our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, including the modification of the applicable covenants to enable us to repurchase up to $200 million of its equity or debt securities, the modification of the our capital expenditure covenant to increase certain permitted expenditures consistent with our development and expansion projects, and the modification of our collateral documents in accordance with requirements of the Pennsylvania gaming authorities.
At March 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all required covenants.
33
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The table below provides information at March 31, 2007 about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, including debt obligations and interest rate swaps. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts maturing and weighted-average interest rates at year-end. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates outstanding at each year-end. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract and the weighted-average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
4/1/07- |
|
4/1/08- |
|
4/1/09- |
|
4/1/10- |
|
4/1/11- |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
5,324 |
|
$ |
5,707 |
|
$ |
5,608 |
|
$ |
5,502 |
|
$ |
203,341 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
475,482 |
|
$ |
467,542 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
7.00 |
% |
7.00 |
% |
7.00 |
% |
7.00 |
% |
6.88 |
% |
6.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Variable rate |
|
$ |
49,000 |
|
$ |
89,625 |
|
$ |
97,750 |
|
$ |
463,375 |
|
$ |
832,500 |
|
$ |
775,500 |
|
$ |
2,307,750 |
|
$ |
2,307,750 |
|
Average interest rate (1) |
|
6.82 |
% |
6.30 |
% |
6.36 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.86 |
% |
6.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Leases |
|
$ |
2,102 |
|
$ |
2,295 |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
$ |
10,206 |
|
$ |
10,206 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
6.89 |
% |
6.89 |
% |
6.40 |
% |
5.64 |
% |
5.64 |
% |
7.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest rate derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Variable to fixed (2) |
|
$ |
1,260,000 |
|
$ |
811,000 |
|
$ |
574,000 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
(872 |
) |
|
Average pay rate |
|
4.84 |
% |
4.93 |
% |
5.02 |
% |
5.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
||||||||
Average receive rate (3) |
|
5.24 |
% |
4.75 |
% |
4.82 |
% |
4.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(1) |
Estimated rate, reflective of forward LIBOR plus the spread over LIBOR applicable to variable-rate borrowing. |
|
|
(2) |
Notional amounts outstanding at each year-end. |
|
|
(3) |
Estimated rate, reflective of forward LIBOR. |
In accordance with the terms of our $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility, we were required to enter into interest rate swap agreements in an amount equal to 50% of the outstanding term loan balances within 100 days of the closing date of the $2.725 billion senior secured credit facility. On October 27, 2005, we entered into four interest rate swap contracts with terms from three to five years, notional amounts of $224 million, $274 million, $225 million, and $237 million, for a total of $960 million, and fixed interest rates ranging from 4.678% to 4.753%. The annual weighted-average interest rate of the four contracts is 4.71%. On May 8, 2006, we entered into three interest rate swap contracts with a term of five years and notional amounts of $100 million each, for a total of $300 million and fixed interest rates ranging from 5.263% to 5.266%. The annual weighted-average interest rate of the three contracts is 5.26%. Under all of these contracts, we pay a fixed interest rate against a variable interest rate based on the 90-day LIBOR rate. The 90-day LIBOR rate relating to these contracts as of March 31, 2007 was 5.36% for both the $960 million swaps and the $300 million swaps.
34
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007, which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to provide that (a) material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to these officers by other employees of us and our consolidated subsidiaries, particularly material information related to the period for which this periodic report is being prepared; and (b) this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Information in response to this Item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in Note 8: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Exhibit |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Claim Settlement Agreement among Penn National Gaming, Inc. and the insurance providers severally underwriting share of Penn National Gaming, Inc.s all-risk property insurance program, completed January 22, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Ground Lease, dated March 23, 2007, between Skrmetta MS, LLC as Landlord and BTN, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National Gaming, Inc., as Tenant. |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Employment Agreement dated June 10, 2005 between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Robert S. Ippolito. |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
CEO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
CFO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Filed herewith
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. |
||
|
|
|
May 10, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ William J. Clifford |
|
|
William J. Clifford |
|
|
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Claim Settlement Agreement among Penn National Gaming, Inc. and the insurance providers severally underwriting share of Penn National Gaming, Inc.s all-risk property insurance program, completed January 22, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Ground Lease, dated March 23, 2007, between Skrmetta MS, LLC as Landlord and BTN, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National Gaming, Inc., as Tenant. |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Employment Agreement dated June 10, 2005 between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Robert S. Ippolito. |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
CEO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
CFO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Filed herewith
37
Exhibit 10.2
AMENDED AND RESTATED
GROUND LEASE
Between
SKRMETTA MS, LLC
as Landlord
and
BTN,
INC.,
as Tenant
AMENDED AND RESTATED GROUND LEASE
Between SKRMETTA MS, LLC,
as Landlord,
and BTN, INC., as Tenant
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS |
|
1 |
|
||
1.1 |
|
Adjusted Gaming Win |
|
1 |
|
1.2 |
|
After Acquired Property |
|
2 |
|
1.3 |
|
Affiliate of Tenant |
|
2 |
|
1.4 |
|
Barge |
|
2 |
|
1.5 |
|
Building Service Equipment |
|
2 |
|
1.6 |
|
Commencement Date |
|
2 |
|
1.7 |
|
Effective Date |
|
2 |
|
1.8 |
|
Existing Lease |
|
2 |
|
1.9 |
|
Force Majeure Event |
|
2 |
|
1.10 |
|
Gaming Operations |
|
2 |
|
1.11 |
|
Gaming Site |
|
3 |
|
1.12 |
|
Gross Gaming Win |
|
3 |
|
1.13 |
|
Improvements |
|
3 |
|
1.14 |
|
Initial Acquisition Property |
|
3 |
|
1.15 |
|
Landlords Estate |
|
3 |
|
1.16 |
|
Lease Term |
|
3 |
|
1.17 |
|
Lease Year |
|
3 |
|
1.18 |
|
Leased Property |
|
3 |
|
1.19 |
|
New Lease |
|
3 |
|
1.20 |
|
Premises |
|
4 |
|
1.21 |
|
Prime Rate |
|
4 |
|
1.22 |
|
Property |
|
4 |
|
1.23 |
|
Tenants Estate |
|
4 |
|
1.24 |
|
Tidelands Property |
|
4 |
|
1.25 |
|
Trade Fixtures |
|
4 |
|
1.26 |
|
Waterfront Area |
|
4 |
|
ARTICLE 2 DEMISE, POSSESSION, TERM, OPTIONS TO EXTEND |
|
5 |
|
||
2.1 |
|
Demise of Premises |
|
5 |
|
2.2 |
|
Acquisition of the Initial Acquisition Property by Landlord |
|
5 |
|
2.3 |
|
Term |
|
7 |
|
2.4 |
|
Possession |
|
7 |
|
2.5 |
|
Additions to the Premises: |
|
7 |
|
2.6 |
|
Termination Right on One Years Notice: |
|
9 |
|
2.7 |
|
Gaming Law Invalid |
|
10 |
|
2.8 |
|
Tidelands Lease: |
|
10 |
|
2.9 |
|
Prohibition on Acquiring After Acquired Property |
|
11 |
|
i
2.10 |
|
Leased Property |
|
11 |
|
ARTICLE 3 RENT |
|
12 |
|
||
3.1 |
|
Rent |
|
12 |
|
3.2 |
|
Payment of Rent |
|
12 |
|
3.3 |
|
Audits |
|
12 |
|
3.4 |
|
Last Years Rent |
|
12 |
|
3.5 |
|
Lump Sum Payment |
|
12 |
|
3.6 |
|
Supplemental Rent Payment |
|
13 |
|
ARTICLE 4 PAYMENT OF IMPOSITIONS AND UTILITY CHARGES |
|
13 |
|
||
4.1 |
|
Impositions |
|
13 |
|
4.2 |
|
Apportionment |
|
13 |
|
4.3 |
|
Right to Contest |
|
13 |
|
4.4 |
|
Utility Charges |
|
14 |
|
ARTICLE 5 USE |
|
14 |
|
||
5.1 |
|
Permitted Use |
|
14 |
|
5.2 |
|
Compliance with Law |
|
14 |
|
5.3 |
|
Waste |
|
14 |
|
5.4 |
|
Required Gaming Operations |
|
14 |
|
ARTICLE 6 IMPROVEMENTS |
|
15 |
|
||
6.1 |
|
Construction of Improvements |
|
15 |
|
6.2 |
|
Demolition of Improvements and Construction of New Improvements |
|
15 |
|
6.3 |
|
Permits and Easements |
|
15 |
|
6.4 |
|
Ownership of Improvements |
|
16 |
|
6.5 |
|
Removal of Trade Fixtures |
|
16 |
|
ARTICLE 7 MECHANICS LIENS |
|
17 |
|
||
7.1 |
|
Mechanics Liens |
|
17 |
|
7.2 |
|
Contests |
|
17 |
|
ARTICLE 8 INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY |
|
17 |
|
||
8.1 |
|
Required Insurance |
|
17 |
|
8.2 |
|
Required Terms |
|
18 |
|
8.3 |
|
Partial Release of Liability and Waiver of Subrogation |
|
18 |
|
8.4 |
|
Indemnity |
|
18 |
|
8.5 |
|
Business Interruption Insurance |
|
18 |
|
ARTICLE 9 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND RESTORATION OF DAMAGE |
|
18 |
|
||
9.1 |
|
Tenants Duty to Maintain and Repair |
|
18 |
|
9.2 |
|
Tenants Duty to Restore Insured Damage to Improvements |
|
19 |
|
9.3 |
|
Tenants Option Following Damage to the Improvements Near the End of the Lease Term and/or Following Uninsured Damage to the Improvements |
|
19 |
|
9.4 |
|
Insurance Proceeds |
|
20 |
|
9.5 |
|
Interruption of Gaming Operations |
|
20 |
|
ARTICLE 10 CONDEMNATION |
|
21 |
|
||
10.1 |
|
Definitions |
|
21 |
|
10.2 |
|
Total Taking |
|
22 |
|
10.3 |
|
Partial Taking |
|
22 |
|
10.4 |
|
Temporary Taking |
|
22 |
|
10.5 |
|
Apportionment of Award |
|
22 |
|
ii
10.6 |
|
General |
|
23 |
|
ARTICLE 11 DEFAULT AND REMEDIES |
|
23 |
|
||
11.1 |
|
Events of Tenants Default |
|
23 |
|
11.2 |
|
Landlords Remedies |
|
24 |
|
11.3 |
|
Landlords Default and Tenants Remedies |
|
24 |
|
ARTICLE 12 TERMINATION |
|
25 |
|
||
12.1 |
|
Surrender on Termination |
|
25 |
|
12.2 |
|
Recognition of Tenants Subtenants |
|
26 |
|
12.3 |
|
Removal of Trade Fixtures |
|
26 |
|
12.4 |
|
Tenants Quitclaim |
|
26 |
|
ARTICLE 13 ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING |
|
26 |
|
||
13.1 |
|
Assignment by Tenant |
|
26 |
|
13.2 |
|
Permitted Assignee Defined |
|
27 |
|
13.3 |
|
Subletting |
|
27 |
|
ARTICLE 14 TRANSFER OF PREMISES BY LANDLORD |
|
27 |
|
||
14.1 |
|
Transfer by Landlord |
|
27 |
|
14.2 |
|
Tenants Right of First Refusal: |
|
28 |
|
ARTICLE 15 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGES |
|
29 |
|
||
15.1 |
|
Right to Encumber Tenants Estate: |
|
29 |
|
15.2 |
|
Notice |
|
30 |
|
15.3 |
|
Leasehold Mortgagees Rights and Obligations Prior to Foreclosure |
|
30 |
|
15.4 |
|
Termination |
|
30 |
|
15.5 |
|
Leasehold Mortgagees Rights and Obligations following a Foreclosure |
|
31 |
|
15.6 |
|
Non-Liability of Leasehold Mortgagee |
|
32 |
|
15.7 |
|
No Restriction on Assignment |
|
32 |
|
15.8 |
|
New Lease |
|
32 |
|
15.9 |
|
Covenant of Cooperation |
|
33 |
|
15.10 |
|
No Amendment |
|
33 |
|
15.11 |
|
No Merger |
|
33 |
|
15.12 |
|
Certain Obligations of Leasehold Mortgagee in Possession |
|
33 |
|
15.13 |
|
Designees and Nominees |
|
33 |
|
15.14 |
|
Tenants Rejection of Lease in Bankruptcy |
|
34 |
|
ARTICLE 16 ENVIRONMENTAL |
|
35 |
|
||
16.1 |
|
Landlords Representations |
|
35 |
|
16.2 |
|
Covenant to Comply with Environmental Laws |
|
35 |
|
16.3 |
|
Tenant Indemnity |
|
35 |
|
16.4 |
|
Landlord Obligations: |
|
36 |
|
16.5 |
|
Definition of Environmental Laws |
|
37 |
|
16.6 |
|
Definition of Hazardous Material |
|
37 |
|
16.7 |
|
Exclusive Provisions |
|
38 |
|
ARTICLE 17 GENERAL PROVISIONS |
|
38 |
|
||
17.1 |
|
Estoppel Certificates |
|
38 |
|
17.2 |
|
Holding Over |
|
38 |
|
17.3 |
|
Notices |
|
38 |
|
17.4 |
|
Attorneys Fees |
|
39 |
|
17.5 |
|
No Merger |
|
39 |
|
iii
17.6 |
|
Arbitration |
|
39 |
|
17.7 |
|
Quiet Enjoyment |
|
40 |
|
17.8 |
|
No Partnership |
|
40 |
|
17.9 |
|
Captions |
|
40 |
|
17.10 |
|
Duplicate Originals; Counterparts |
|
40 |
|
17.11 |
|
Time of the Essence |
|
40 |
|
17.12 |
|
Severability |
|
40 |
|
17.13 |
|
Interpretation |
|
41 |
|
17.14 |
|
Successors Bound |
|
41 |
|
17.15 |
|
No Waiver |
|
41 |
|
17.16 |
|
Covenant of Fair Dealing |
|
41 |
|
17.17 |
|
Delays |
|
41 |
|
17.18 |
|
Integration |
|
41 |
|
17.19 |
|
Memorandum of Lease |
|
42 |
|
17.20 |
|
Limit on Tenants Liability |
|
42 |
|
17.21 |
|
Limit on Landlords Liability |
|
42 |
|
Exhibit A - Legal Description of Demised Premises |
|
Exhibit A-1 - Plan of the Waterfront Area |
|
Exhibit B - Initial Acquisition Property |
|
Exhibit C - Permitted Exceptions |
|
Exhibit D - Existing Leases |
|
Exhibit E - Memorandum of Lease |
|
iv
AMENDED AND RESTATED
GROUND LEASE
THIS GROUND LEASE is made as of the last date executed by any party hereto (the Execution Date) but intended to be effective as of the Effective Date (as defined below), by and among SKRMETTA MS, LLC, an Mississippi limited liability company (Landlord), and BTN, INC., a Mississippi corporation (Tenant).
BACKGROUND
Raphael Skrmetta, an individual (Skrmetta) and Mississippi-I Gaming, L.P., a Mississippi limited partnership (Former Tenant) entered into a certain Ground Lease dated October 19, 1993, as amended on October 19, 1993, November 2, 1993 and June 12, 2000 (collectively, the Prior Lease), by and through which Skrmetta leased to Former Tenant all that certain real property described below as Premises.
On or about August, 2000 (the Assignment Date), Former Tenant assigned all of its right, title and interest in and to the Premises and any and all Improvements (as defined below) located on the Premises to Tenant and Tenant assumed all of Former Tenants obligations under the Prior Lease accruing after and relating to the period from and after the Assignment Date.
Prior to the Execution Date, Skrmetta transferred one-half of his right, title and interest in and to the Premises to Alfreda D. Skrmetta, and then, for himself and as curator for Alfreda D. Skrmetta, immediately conveyed all of the right, title and interest in and to the Premises to Landlord, Landlord having been determined by the Mississippi Gaming Commission to be suitable.
Landlord and Tenant desire to amend and restate the Prior Lease in its entirety to incorporate certain amendments and additions thereto as agreed by Landlord and Tenant.
NOW, THEREFORE, Landlord and Tenant, for and in consideration of the Premises and the covenants and conditions set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, agree to amend and restate the Prior Lease in its entirety (such amended and restated Prior Lease hereinafter referred to as the Lease).
2
3
4
5
6
as then described, free and clear of any liens, encumbrances, leases, rights of use or occupancy or any other rights or privileges, other than this Lease. From and after the settlement, the Initial Acquisition Property that is owned by Landlord and that is incorporated into the definition of Premises pursuant to this Section 2.2F shall be subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease, including, but not limited to, being subject to Rent pursuant to Section 3.1 below.
7
acquired by Landlord in this specific transaction and not Tenants Estate or title to the Improvements or Tenants Trade Fixtures or personal property.
8
sale, or relet the Premises, in which event, upon the earlier of either the commencement of rental payments under such new lease or the thirteenth month following the Lease termination date, payments of principal and interest under the Loan Documents shall recommence.
9
10
State of Mississippi (Tidelands Area), such lease being on the terms and conditions acceptable to Tenant. Tenant, as the lessee thereunder, shall be responsible for payment of all rent under the Tidelands Lease and Tenant shall have the sole and exclusive right to obtain and maintain the Tidelands Lease.
11
12
13
14
during any particular day while the Improvements and/or any Barge may be legally open for business, or any other operational decisions shall be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of Tenant, including, but not limited to, closing certain portions of the Gaming Facility in order to maintain, repair and replace any fixtures, improvements or equipment, closing any gaming positions as required by the Mississippi Gaming Commission for audit purposes, or not fully staffing certain table games at times when customer needs are reduced; provided, however, that hours of operation shall be in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Mississippi Gaming Commission.
15
which may be required by governmental authorities as a condition to granting any such approval, permit or license or which otherwise may be necessary in connection with constructing improvements on the Premises. Tenant may enter into agreements restricting use or granting easements over the Premises or obtain zoning changes, variances or use permits where necessary in connection with constructing improvements on the Premises. Landlord shall upon request by Tenant execute or join in the execution of any application for such agreements, approvals, permits or licenses and agrees jointly with Tenant to make such necessary dedications as may be required by appropriate governmental agencies or by requisite utility districts and/or companies as a condition to the construction of such improvements. In the event Tenant wishes to sublease a portion of the Premises in a manner requiring the subdivision of the premises and the recordation of a subdivision or parcel map or the taking of any similar measures legally to effect such subdivision, Landlord shall join Tenant in executing all documents necessary to effect such subdivision so long as Tenant pays all costs and expenses arising by reason of such subdivision. All fees in connection with such agreements, approvals, permits or licenses shall be paid by Tenant. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to impose upon Landlord any liability to any governmental authority arising from any breach of any agreement or application executed by or on behalf of Landlord pursuant to this Section and, in connection therewith, Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from any loss, cost, expense or claim against Landlord by any such governmental agency arising from any such breach.
16
17
subparagraph, to the extent appropriate, shall be carried by Tenant in builders risk form written on a completed value basis, insuring against loss to the extent of at lease ninety percent (90%) of the replacement value of that which is being covered.
18
improvements to the Property which may be required by any law or other governmental regulation. Landlord shall have no obligation to make any repairs, alterations or improvements to the Property during the Lease Term. Nothing contained in this Section shall be construed as limiting any right given elsewhere in this Lease to Tenant or obligating Tenant to alter, modify, demolish, remove or replace any Improvements, or as limiting provisions relating to Condemnation or to damage to the Improvements.
19
damaged Improvements with any replacement Improvements, subject to the payment of Rent as provided in Section 9.5 below.
20
21
22
Improvements and any Building Service Equipment, a taking of Tenants personal property and/or Trade Fixtures, for interruption of Tenants business, for Tenants relocation costs, and/or for loss of Tenants goodwill; (ii) the portion of the Award payable as severance damages upon a Partial Taking (if any) shall be equitably apportioned between Landlord and Tenant so that Tenant receives the portion of such severance damages which is fairly attributable to any impairment of Tenants use of the portion of the Property not taken during the then remainder of the Lease Term; and (iii) any Award of attorneys fees and expenses and/or court costs made in any Condemnation proceeding shall be received by the party (ies) who paid or incurred the expense in question. Tenant shall be solely liable for any portion of the Award that my be payable to subtenants and any sublease of the Premises.
23
24
(60) days after written notice from Tenant specifying the nature of such default where such default could reasonably be cured within said sixty (60) day period, or fails to commence such cure within said sixty (60) day period and thereafter continuously with due diligence prosecute such cure to completion where such default could not reasonably be cured with said sixty (60) day period, then Tenant shall have the following remedies:
25
obligation of any kind or nature to Landlord or Tenant. In no event shall the provisions hereof impose any obligation upon Tenant to replace Improvements that are demolished or removed or to restore and/or reconstruct Improvements following any damage or condemnation unless Tenant is required to do so by Article 9 or Article 10.
26
27
uninterrupted use, operation, possession and occupancy of the Property in Tenants then-current manner and Tenants exercise of all its rights and privileges under this Lease, and (B) by written agreement, agreed to (i) recognize Tenant under this Lease, (ii) assume the obligations of Landlord imposed herein, and (iii) be bound by each and every term hereof, including, without limitation, the terms of Section 14.2 whereby Tenant has a continuing right of first refusal to purchase Landlords Estate. In no event shall Landlord have the right to transfer or otherwise assign (a) less than all of Landlords Estate without Tenants prior written consent, which consent may be refused in Tenants sole and absolute discretion, and any such transfer without Tenants consent shall be voidable by Tenant, or (b) any right, title or interest in Landlords Estate if such transfer or assignment would, directly or indirectly, impair, suspend, increase the cost of or otherwise interfere with Tenants possession, occupancy, use or operation of the Property to any extent; whether in its then-current manner or in any other manner permitted under this Lease (including, without limitation, any transfer or assignment to any person or entity that does not then hold all full, final, properly issued and valid licenses required of such person or entity to permit Tenants Gaming Operations from and at the Property).
28
in strict accordance with the terms and conditions contained in Landlords Second Notice. If Landlords Estate has not been sold and transferred after one hundred twenty (120) days have passed since Tenant shall have received Landlords First Offer, then any election by Landlord to assign and sell Landlords Estate shall be deemed a new determination to do so and shall be subject to all of the procedures set forth in this Section. Notwithstanding the election of Tenant not to exercise the right of first refusal contained in this Section, the provisions of this Section shall continue to apply to any successor in interest of Landlord. Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the provision of this Section 14.2 shall not apply to any transfer among the members of Landlord existing on the Execution Date or the transfer by such members to any family trust or Limited Liability Company permitted by the terms of Operating Agreement of the Landlord in effect on the Execution Date so long as the rights granted to Tenant in such Operating Agreement are adhered to.
29
30
carrying same to completion with all reasonable dispatch. If such default cannot be cured by a Leasehold Mortgagee without such Leasehold Mortgagee obtaining possession of the Property or title to Tenants Estate, a Leasehold Mortgagee commencing and thereafter pursuing to completion proceedings to obtain possession and/or to foreclose the lien held by such Leasehold Mortgagee or diligently proceeding to obtain title to Tenants Estate by deed or assignment in lieu of foreclosure shall be deemed to satisfy the foregoing requirement that such Leasehold Mortgagee commences within thirty (30) days after obtaining such possession or such title the work of curing such default and carries the same to completion with all reasonable dispatch; or
(i) the Leasehold Mortgagee is proceeding diligently pursuant to any of the provisions of this Section 15.4; and
(ii) Landlord is receiving rental payments hereunder either as a result of such Leasehold Mortgagee continuing the minimum Gaming Operations as provided in Section 5.4 above or, if such Leasehold Mortgagee is not legally able under Mississippi Gaming Commission regulations to continue such minimum Gaming Operations at the Premises, such Leasehold Mortgagee pays to Landlord monthly Rent in an amount equal to the average monthly Rent paid under this Lease for the twelve (12) month period immediately prior to the Event of Default by Tenant.
31
with respect to any loss, damage, injury or liability resulting from its own (i) negligence, (ii) willful misconduct, or (iii) act or omission constituting a breach under this Lease.
32
of sale, Landlord shall deliver to the new tenant under such new lease an assignment of Landlords rights under all subleases and sub-subleases affecting any portion of the Property and memorandum of such new lease in recordable form. In the event that a nominee or designee of any Leasehold Mortgagee shall be the tenant under such new lease, such designee or nominee shall, at its election, have the right to continue its lien against such new lease and the improvements located on the Property as well as all fixtures and personal property located thereon to secure payment of its then existing outstanding indebtedness.
33
The above notwithstanding, in the event that Landlord fails to give Leasehold Mortgagee the Rejection Notice, Landlord shall have no liability to Leasehold Mortgagee or Tenant under this Lease or otherwise for such failure to give the Rejection Notice or any consequences resulting therefrom, and such failure shall not constitute or be deemed to be a breach hereof or a default hereunder.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Lease, if Tenant shall have rejected this Lease pursuant to Section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 365(a), then as between Landlord and Leasehold Mortgagee this Lease shall remain in full force and effect until the earlier to occur of the following: (i) Landlord shall have given the Rejection Notice provided for above and Leasehold Mortgagee shall have failed to give timely the Assumption Notice or, having given the Assumption Notice, shall have failed to cure within the Bankruptcy Cure Periods any defaults required to be cured hereunder, or (ii) Leasehold Mortgagee shall have served on Landlord a notice of Leasehold
34
Mortgagees election not to assume this Lease. If Leasehold Mortgagee does not assume this Lease or, after assuming the same fails to fulfill the terms hereof, Landlord shall have the right to terminate this Lease as provided herein and in the event of such termination, all rights of Leasehold Mortgagee in the Premises and the Improvements shall cease and be of no further force and effect.
35
Tenant shall have no other liability, responsibility or duty to reimburse Landlord with respect to any Hazardous Material on or about the Premises or any Environmental Law regarding the Premises or the soil, air, improvements, groundwater or surface water thereof.
36
in the structures to be demolished. Tenant shall then identify all parts of such structures which will be removed and disposed of by Landlord in accordance with its obligations concerning asbestos removal described above. Tenant shall then require applicants to state the amount of their bid for demolition, excluding the obligation to demolish and remove such identified portions of the structures. If the applicant to which Tenant awards the demolition contract reduces its bid as a result of Landlords removal and disposal of such identified portions of the structures, Tenant shall pay Landlord an amount equal to such cost savings. Such payment shall constitute payment in full for Landlords asbestos removal and disposal activities hereunder.
37
Water Pollution Control Act, as now or hereafter amended, the Clean Air Act, as now or hereafter amended, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, as now or hereafter amended, and similar laws now or hereafter enacted.
38
Raphael
Skrmetta, Managing Member
Skrmetta MS, LLC
501 Destrehan Avenue
Harvey, Louisiana 70058
with a duplicate copy to:
Eric
Skrmetta
117 Sena Drive
Metarie, Louisiana 70005
and if addressed to Tenant, the address of Tenant is:
BTN,
Inc,
676 Bayview Avenue
Biloxi, MI 39530
ATTN: General Manager
with a duplicate copy to:
General
Counsel
Penn National Gaming, Inc.
825 Berkshire Boulevard
Wyomissing, PA 19610
Either Landlord or Tenant may change its respective addresses by giving written notice to the other in accordance with the provisions of this Section.
39
Arbitration Association or its successor insofar as said rules of procedure do not conflict with the laws of the State of Mississippi then in force. Once notice to arbitrate has been given, Landlord and Tenant shall jointly, within fifteen (15) days of such notice, select one arbitrator, or if they cannot agree on one arbitrator then each shall select an arbitrator within twenty (20) days of delivery of said notice, and the two arbitrators selected shall designate the third arbitrator within twenty-five (25) days of delivery of said notice. The three arbitrators shall convene as soon as practicable and offer Landlord and Tenant the opportunity to present their cases. If any party to the arbitration, after being duly notified, fails to appear, participate or produce evidence at an arbitration hearing, the arbitrator(s) may make an award based solely on the evidence actually presented. The arbitrators shall, by majority vote, make such award and decision as is appropriate and in accord with the terms of this Lease, and such award shall be binding upon Landlord and Tenant and enforceable in a court of law. The cost of arbitration shall be borne by Landlord and Tenant as determined by the arbitrators. In the event either party fails to appoint an arbitrator or the two arbitrators fail to select a third arbitrator within the time required by this Section, then upon application of either party, the arbitrator shall be appointed by the American Arbitration Association or if there be no American Arbitration Association or it shall refuse to perform this function, then at the request of either Landlord or Tenant such arbitrator shall be appointed by the then senior judge of the Chancery Court of the State of Mississippi for the Second Judicial District of the County of Harrison.
40
every other provision of this Lease shall remain and subsist in full force and effect, and this Lease shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had not been contained herein.
41
control. Except as otherwise provided herein, no subsequent change or addition to this Lease shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
[CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE]
42
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amended and Restated Ground Lease on the respective dates below set forth to be effective as of the Effective Date.
LANDLORD: |
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
SKRMETTA
MS, LLC, a Mississippi |
|||||
Dated: |
March 23, 2007 |
|
|
|||
|
By: |
/s/ Raphael Skrmetta |
|
|||
|
RAPHAEL SKRMETTA, Manager |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
TENANT: |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
BTN,
INC., |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Dated: |
March 23, 2007 |
|
By: |
/s/Robert S. Ippolito |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Title: |
Sec/Treas |
|
|||
43
EXHIBIT A
Legal description of real property situated in the Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi, and described as follows:
Property in Block 1: Commencing on the northern side Bay View Avenue at a point marked by a rod at the intersection of Bay View Avenue and extension of the east line of Main Street; thence N 73º 28 E a distance of 440.7 feet along Bay View Avenue to a point marked by a pipe; thence North 282.0 feet to a pipe; thence to the Back Bay of Biloxi, thence westerly along Back Bay of Biloxi to a point marked by a rod on the extension of the east line of Main Street; thence south 344.4 feet to a point marked by a rod at the intersection of Bay View Avenue and the extension of the east line of Main Street and the point of beginning. Said piece of ground contains Lots 1 through 3 inclusive, Block 1, Gorenflos Addition, City of Biloxi, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi.
Property in Block 2: Commencing at a point in Block 2 on Bay View Avenue marked by a pipe and thence South a Distance 230 feet along a line to a point marked by an iron pipe; thence South 0º 10 East a distance of 150.4 feet to a point marked by a post; thence South 3º 37 East a distance of 67.6 feet to a point marked by a post; thence South 1º 00 West a distance of 257.5 feet to a point marked by a post; thence 89º 47 West a distance of 130 feet to a point marked by a pipe; thence North along Davis Street a distance of 475.3 feet to a point marked by a pipe; thence North 89º 47 East a distance of 130 feet to a point marked by a pipe. Said piece of ground contains Lots 3 through 11 inclusive, Block 2, Gorenflos Addition, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi.
Property in Block 3: Commencing at a point at the corner of Bay View Avenue and Davis Street; thence South a distance of 652.5 feet along Davis Street to a point marked by a pipe; thence South 89º 47 West a distance of 128 feet to a point marked by a pipe; thence North 0º16 West a distance of 288.1 feet to a point marked by a post; thence South 87º 05 West a distance of 122.3 feet to a point marked by a post on Main Street; thence North a distance of 60 feet along Main Street to a point marked by a post; thence North 89º 02 East a distance of 76 feet to a point marked by a post; thence North 0º 04 West a distance of 253.9 feet to a point on Bay View Avenue marked by a pipe; thence North 72º 51 East a distance of 184.5 feet along Bay View Avenue to the point of beginning. Said piece of ground contains Lots 1 through 11 inclusive, Block 3, Gorenflos Addition, and that lot having a front on Main Street of 60 feet and bounded formerly on the North by property of St. Johns Catholic Church and bounded formerly on the South by a property of Bourgeois; bounded formerly on the East by C.B. Foster Packing Company, and bounded on the West by Main Street, located in Gorenflos Addition to the City of Biloxi, in the Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi.
This property is also described as shown on the following pages 2 and 3 of this Exhibit A, and the following legal description is more expansive than the legal description above (on this page). The description on pages 2 and 3 includes tidelands property, part of Davis Street which has been vacated and part of Lot 12, Block 3, Gorenflos Addition.
Exhibit A - page 1
The description on the next two pages excludes property which has been dedicated to the City of Biloxi for cul-de-sacs.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A
For the POINT OF BEGINNING, commence at a point on the North margin of Bay View Avenue, said point being at the intersection of said North margin of Bay view Avenue, with the extension of the East line of Main Street; thence run North 0º 3007 East, for a distance of 352.72 feet to a point at the Waters Edge in the Back Bay of Biloxi; thence run along said Waters Edge, the following bearings and distances, to wit; North 65º 0107 East, 106.37 feet; North 14º 5907 West, 79.83 feet; North 11º1927 West, 27.44 feet; North 81º2623 East, 94.03 feet; South 08º1159 East, 22.25 feet; North 81º5406 East, 49.27 feet; North 09º1315 West, 7.92 feet; North 75º1101 East, 39.18 feet; South 07º1610 East, 25.28 feet; South 0º4705 East, 18.55 feet; South 65º1104 East, 89.88 feet; South 02º3947 West, 9.06 feet; South 59º3439 East, 35.62 feet South 89º0025 East, 54.89 feet; thence run South 0º3007 West, for a distance of 283.54 feet to a point on the North margin of Bay View Avenue; thence run South 73º2800 West, along said North margin, for a distance of 440.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 163,937 Square Feet, or 3.76 Acres, approximately.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL B (Tidelands)
COMMENCE at a point on the North margin of Bay View Avenue, said point being at the intersection of said North margin with the extension of the East margin of Main Street; thence run North 0º3007 East, for a distance of 352.72 feet to a point on the waters edge in the Back Bay of Biloxi, and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue North 0º3007 East, for a distance of 627.28 feet to a point; thence run South 89º2953 East, for a distance of 421.62 feet to a point; thence run South 0º3007 West, for a distance of 567.28 feet to a point on the waters edge in the Back Bay of Biloxi, thence run along the waters edge, the following bearings and distances, to wit; North 89º0025 West, 54.89 feet, North 59º3439 West, 35.62 feet; North 02º3947 East, 9.06 feet; North 65º1104 West, 89.88 feet; North 0º4705 West, 18.55 feet; North 07º1610 West, 25.28 feet; South 75º1101 West, 39.18 feet, South 09º1315 East, 7.92 feet; South 81º5406 West, 49.27 feet; North 08º1159 West, 22.25 feet; South 81º2623 West, 94.03 feet; South 11º1927 East, 27.44 feet; South 14º5907 East, 79.83 feet and South 65º0107 West, for a distance of 106.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 222,022 Square Feet, or 5.10 Acres, approximately.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL C
For the POINT OF BEGINNING, commence at the point of intersection of the South margin of Bay View Avenue with the West margin of Davis Street, said point being further described as the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 3, Gorenflos Addition to the City of Biloxi, Harrison County, Mississippi, as shown on the official map or plat thereof on file and of record in Plat Book 6, Page 16 of the Record of Plats of Harrison County, Mississippi; from said POINT OF BEGINNING, thence run South 0º2445, West, for a distance of 184.84 feet to a point; thence run South 44º4326 East, for a
Exhibit A - page 2
distance of 47.89 feet to a point; thence run South 89º5138 East, for a distance of 6.05 feet to a point on the East margin of Davis Street; thence run Northeasterly along a curve to the left, said curve having a central angle of 78º4412 and a radius of 50.0 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve, for a distance of 68.71 feet to a point which bears North 51º0240 East, 63.43 feet from the previously described point; thence run South 89º5138 East for a distance of 80.66 feet to a point; thence run South 0º2038 West, for a distance of 150.63 feet to a point; thence run South 03º1231 East, for a distance of 67.25 feet to a point; thence run South 02º1003 West, for a distance of 63.79 feet to a point; thence run South 01º2227 West, for a distance of 193.13 feet to a point; thence run South 89º3513 West, for a distance of 128.95 feet to a point on the East Margin of Davis Street; thence along a curve to the left, said curve having a central angle of 180º00 and a radius of 50.0 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve for a distance of 157.08 feet to a point on the East margin of Davis Street; thence run South 89º 3513 West, for a distance of 11.21 feet to a point; thence run South 45º0000 West, for a distance of 41.00 feet to a point; thence run South 0º2445 West, for a distance of 71.22 feet to a point; thence run south 89º3513 West, for a distance of 127.46 feet to a point; thence run North 1º0117 West, for a distance of 290.54 feet to a point; thence run South 88º5007 West, for a distance of 122.30 feet to a point on the East margin of Main Street; thence run North 0º5006 East, along said East margin, for a distance of 60.38 feet to a point; thence run South 89º4831 East, for a distance of 75.51 feet to a point; thence run North 0º0433 East, for a distance of 254.95 feet to a point on the South margin of Bay View Avenue; thence run North 73º2800 East, along said South margin, for a distance of 185.49 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 180.763 Square Feet, or 4.15 acres approximately.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL D
For the POINT OF BEGINNING, commence at a point on the West margin of Davis Street; said point being the Northeast corner of Lot 12, Block 3, Gorenflos Addition to the City of Biloxi, Harrison County, Mississippi, as shown on the official map or plat thereof on file and of record in Plat Book 6, Page 16 of the record of Plats or Harrison County, Mississippi; thence run South 0º2445 West, along said West margin, for a distance of 13.11 feet to a point; thence run South 89º5737 West, for a distance of 127.35 feet to a point; thence run North 0º 0117 West, for a distance of 12.28 feet to a point; thence run North 89º3513 East, for a distance of 127.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 1617 Square Feet, or 0.04 Acre approximately.
Parcel E
A parcel situated in Fractional Section 28, Township 7 South, Range 9 West, City of Biloxi, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi, better described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North margin of Bay View Avenue, said point being the intersection of said North margin with the extension of the East margin of Main Street, thence N 00º4927 W 353.72 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence continue N 00º4927 W 100.28 feet, thence N 89º1037 E 80.92 feet, thence S 16º1838 E 56.58
Exhibit A - page 3
feet, thence S 63º4136 W 106.37 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 7020 square feet or 0.16 acres.
Parcel F
A parcel situated in Fractional Section 28, Township 7 South, Range 9 West, City of Biloxi, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi, better described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North margin of Bay view Avenue, said point being the intersection of said North margin with the extension of the East margin of Main Street, thence N 00º4927 W 453.00 feet, thence N 89º1037 E 307.47 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence continue N 89º1037 E 114.15 feet, thence S 00º4927 E 40.28 feet, thence S 89º4004 W 54.89 feet, then N 60º5410 W 35.62 feet thence N 01º2016 E 9.06 feet, thence N 66º3035 W 31.56 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 3333 square feed of 0.08 acres.
Exhibit A - page 4
EXHIBIT A-1
PLAN OF THE WATERFRONT AREA
[map of waterfront area attached]
EXHIBIT B
INITIAL ACQUISITION PROPERTY
The Initial Acquisition Property is outlined in Red on Exhibit A-1 and shall be more specifically described in the survey thereof being obtained by Landlord, with the legal description thereof being appended to this Lease by an amendment hereto once the survey is completed.
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT C
PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS
ITEM 1. Any prior reservation or conveyance, together with release of damages, of minerals of every kind and character including, but not limited to oil, gas, sand and gravel in, on and under subject property.
ITEM 2. Easements or other uses of subject property not visible from the surface, or easements or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
ITEM 3. Subject o riparian and/or littoral rights and title to that portion of the captioned property which lies beneath the ordinary high water mark as established as the date the State of Mississippi was admitted to the Union, subject to any changes that may have occurred, all of which shall be and remain the property of Tenant pursuant to any applicable Tidelands Lease..
ITEM 4 Subject to the Conditional Use Plat recorded in Plat Book 13 at page 39 and 39A on file and of record in the Office of the Chancery Clerk of Harrison County, Second Judicial District, Mississippi.
ITEM 5 Subject to the terms and conditions of this lease.
ITEM 6 Until such time as anticipated tidelands lease with State of Mississippi is executed and made part of this policy by endorsement, approved by the Company, the liability of this policy is limited to the value of said insured leasehold interest as set forth on Schedule A of policy.
ITEM 7 Subject to the rights of the United States of America to protect, regulate and improve navigation in the Gulf of Mexico and the Back Bay of Biloxi and, in connection therewith, to establish harbor lines to regulate the construction of piers, wharves, bulkheads or other works and the making of deposits therein.
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT D
EXISTING LEASES
Lease |
|
Date of Lease |
|
Commencement Date |
|
Initial Term |
|
Renewal Term |
|
Description of Property |
Gollott and Mississippi-I Gaming, L.P. |
|
September 22, 1994 |
|
September 24, 1994 |
|
10 years from the Commencement Date |
|
One additional term of 10 years. Such option shall be automatically exercised unless Lessee gives written notice to Lessor at least 180 days prior to expiration of Initial Term |
|
Block 2, Lot 2, William Gorenflo Addition in the City of Biloxi, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi |
Cvitanovich and Mississippi-I Gaming, LP |
|
March 3, 1994 |
|
March 3, 1994 |
|
99 years from the Commencement Date |
|
Month-to Month Tenancy
At the expiration of the Initial Term with Lessors consent, such holding over shall be deemed to have created a month-to-month tenancy, and subject to all the terms, covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in the Lease at the monthly rental last in effect |
|
Three parcels situated along Bay View Avenue and Main Street, City of Biloxi, Second Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi |
Exhibit D
EXHIBIT E
Prepared by and, when recorded, return to:
The Law
Offices of Michael F. Cavanaugh
998 Howard Avenue
Biloxi, MS 39530
MEMORANDUM OF LEASE
This Memorandum of Lease is made as of the 23rd day of March, 2007, by and among Skrmetta MS, LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company (Landlord) , and BTN, Inc., a Mississippi corporation (Tenant).
A. Raphael Skrmetta, an individual (Skrmetta) and Mississippi-I Gaming, L.P., a Mississippi limited partnership (Former Tenant) entered into a certain Ground Lease dated October 19, 1993, as amended on October 19, 1993, November 2, 1993 and June 12, 2000 (collectively, the Prior Lease), pursuant to which Skrmetta leased to Prior Tenant and Prior Tenant leased from Skrmetta certain real property commonly known as 676 Bayview Avenue, Biloxi, Harrison County, Mississippi, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached to the Prior Lease.
B. A Memorandum of Lease dated October 19, 1993, by and among Skrmetta and Prior Tenant was executed and recorded in Book 262 at Page 210, and re-recorded in Book 262 at Page 359, of the Records in the Office of the Chancery Clerk of Harrison County, Second Judicial District, Mississippi, (the Records) a Memorandum of Second Amendment to Ground Lease dated November 2, 1993 by and among Skrmetta and Prior Tenant was executed and recorded in Book 263 at Page 83 of the Records, and a Memorandum of Third Amendment to Ground Lease dated June 12, 2000 by and among Skrmetta and Prior Tenant was executed and recorded in Book 357, Page 309 of the Records (collectively, the Memoranda of Prior Lease).
C. Prior Tenant assigned all of its right, title and interest in and to the Prior Lease and the Premises to Tenant on or about August, 2000.
D. Prior to the date hereof, Skrmetta transferred one-half of his right, title and interest in and to the Premises to Alfreda D. Skrmetta, and then, for himself and as curator for Alfreda D. Skrmetta, immediately conveyed all of the right, title and interest in and to the Premises to Landlord.
Exhibit E - page 1
E. Tenant has granted its written consent for the assignment of the Amended Lease and transfer of premises owned by Skrmetta unto the Landlord pursuant to the terms of the prior lease.
F. Landlord and Tenant have amended and restated the Prior Lease and desire to Amend and Restate the Memoranda of Prior Lease as stated herein.
Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the Premises and the Lease (as defined below) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and intending to be legally bound hereby, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The Memoranda of Prior Lease are hereby superseded in its entirety by this Memorandum of Lease.
2. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord, that certain real property commonly known as 676 Bayview Avenue, Biloxi, Harrison County, Mississippi, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, together with (i) all buildings, structures and improvements existing on such real property as of October 19, 1993, and (ii) all easements, licenses, rights and privileges appurtenant thereto (including, without limitation, all right, title and interest of Landlord in, under and to the land lying in the streets and roads abutting such real property to the central lines thereof) (all of which is referred to collectively herein as the Premises), on the terms and conditions of that certain Amended and Restated Ground Lease (the Amended Lease) dated the date hereof by Landlord and Tenant regarding the Premises.
3. Pursuant to the Amended Lease, Tenant shall convey unto Landlord certain property more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto under the terms and conditions described in the Amended Lease, and, after completion of such conveyance, such property described on Exhibit B in conjunction with the property described in Exhibit A shall be collectively described as the Premises under the Amended Lease.
4. Tenant shall be entitled to use and possess the Premises for eighty-six (86) years commencing on the Commencement Date (as defined in the Lease) and ending at midnight on the eighty-sixth (86th) anniversary of the Commencement Date.
5. Tenant shall also be entitled to terminate the Amended Lease prior to the expiration of the Amended Lease term on the terms and conditions proved in the Amended Lease.
6. Landlord hereby grants to Tenant both an option and a continuing right of first refusal to purchase any or all right, title and interest of Landlord in, under and to the Premises and the Amended Lease on the terms and conditions provided in the Lease.
7. All capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Amended Lease. The purpose of this Memorandum is to give
Exhibit E - page 2
public notice of the existence of the Amended Lease. In the event, however, of any inconsistency between this Memorandum and the terms and conditions of the Amended Lease, the Amended Lease shall prevail
[continued on next page]
Exhibit E - page 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Lease, by their duly-authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written.
LANDLORD: |
|||||
|
|
||||
|
SKRMETTA MS, LLC, a Mississippi |
||||
|
|
||||
|
By: |
/s/ Raphael Skrmetta |
|
||
|
|
RAPHAEL SKRMETTA, Manager |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
TENANT: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
BTN, INC., |
||||
|
a Mississippi corporation |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
By: |
/s/ Robert S. Ippolito |
|
||
|
Name: |
Robert S. Ippolito |
|||
|
Title: |
Sec/Treas |
|
||
Exhibit E - page 4
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
COUNTY OF HARRISON
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority in and for the aforesaid County and State, the within named RAPHAEL SKRMETTA, who acknowledged that he signed and delivered the foregoing Memorandum of Lease, as Manager of Skrmetta MS, LLC, on the day and year therein mentioned, of his own free will and voluntary act.
Given under my hand and seal of office, this the 23rd day of March, 2007.
/s/ Jane Tramuta |
|||||
|
NOTARY PUBLIC |
||||
|
|||||
My commission Expires |
|||||
9-28-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
[Notarial Seal] |
|||||
Exhibit E - page 5
Exhibit 10.3
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement) is entered into as of this 10th day of June, 2005 (the Commencement Date) by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), and Robert S. Ippolito, an individual residing in Pennsylvania (Executive).
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have are party to an Employment Agreement (as amended and extended from time to time, the Initial Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the parties now desire to terminate the Initial Agreement and to enter into a new agreement reflecting, among other things, certain additional covenants and consideration exchanged by the parties, all as more specifically set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1. Employment. The Company hereby agrees to employ Executive and Executive hereby accepts such employment, in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions hereinafter set forth.
1.1. Duties and Responsibilities. Executive shall serve as Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company. Executive shall perform all duties and accept all responsibilities incident to such position as may be reasonably assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board). Executives principal place of employment shall be in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania.
1.2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date hereof and shall terminate at the close of business on the third anniversary of the Commencement Date (the Initial Term), unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 3 hereof. This Agreement shall automatically renew for additional three-year periods (each, a Renewal Term and, together with the Initial Term, the Employment Term) unless either party has delivered written notice of non-renewal at least 60 days prior to the start of a Renewal Term or unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 3 hereof.
1.3. Extent of Service. Executive agrees to use Executives best efforts to carry out Executives duties and responsibilities and, consistent with the other provisions of this Agreement, to devote substantially all of Executives business time, attention and energy thereto. The foregoing shall not be construed as preventing Executive from serving on the board of philanthropic organizations, or providing oversight with respect to his personal investments, so long as such service does not materially interfere with Executives duties hereunder.
2. Compensation. For all services rendered by Executive to the Company, the Company shall compensate Executive as set forth below.
1
2.1. Base Salary. The Company shall pay Executive a base salary (Base Salary), commencing on the Commencement Date, at the annual rate of two hundred forty thousand ($240,000) dollars, payable in installments at such times as the Company customarily pays its other senior executives (Peer Executives). Executives performance and Base Salary shall be reviewed annually. Any increase in Base Salary or other compensation shall be made at the discretion of the Board or the compensation committee of the Board (the Compensation Committee).
2.2. Cash Bonuses. Executive shall participate in the Companys incentive compensation plan for senior management as such may be adopted, amended and approved, from time to time, by the Compensation Committee.
2.3. Equity Compensation. The Company may grant to Executive options or other equity compensation pursuant to, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the then current equity compensation plan of Penn National Gaming, Inc. The Compensation Committee shall set the amount and terms of such options or other equity compensation.
2.4. Other Benefits. Executive shall be entitled to participate in all other employee benefit plans and programs, including, without limitation, health, vacation, retirement, deferred compensation or SERP, made available to other Peer Executives, as such plans and programs may be in effect from time to time and subject to the eligibility requirements of the each plan. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Company from amending or terminating any retirement, welfare or other employee benefit plans or programs from time to time, as the Company deems appropriate.
2.5. Vacation, Sick Leave and Holidays. Executive shall be entitled in each calendar year to four (4) weeks of paid vacation time. Each vacation shall be taken by Executive at such time or times as agreed upon by the Company and Executive, and any portion of Executives allowable vacation time not used during the calendar year shall be subject to the Companys payroll policies regarding carryover vacation. Executive shall be entitled to holiday and sick leave in accordance with the Companys holiday and other pay for time not worked policies.
2.6. Reimbursement of Expenses. Executive shall be provided with reimbursement of reasonable expenses related to Executives employment by the Company on a basis no less favorable than that authorized from time to time for Peer Executives.
2.7. Automobile. During the term of this Agreement, the Company shall provide Executive with an automobile of such make and model consistent with the Companys policy for its provision of automobiles to Peer Executives. The Company shall reimburse Executive for all expenses arising from or related to the maintenance, repair and daily operation of such automobile in carrying out Executives duties hereunder, including but not limited to, fuel, service and insurance costs, provided that Executive presents vouchers evidencing such expenses as required by the Company.
2.8. Perquisites. The Company shall also continue to pay the premiums for all split dollar life insurance policies issued as of the date hereof and held by that certain irrevocable trusts created by Executive.
2
3. Termination. Executives employment may be terminated prior to the end of the Employment Term in accordance with, and subject to the terms and conditions, set forth below.
3.1. Termination by the Company.
(a) Without Cause. The Company may terminate Executive at any time without Cause (as such term is defined in subsection (b) below) upon delivery of written notice to Executive, which notice shall set forth the effective date of such termination.
(b) With Cause. The Company may terminate Executive at any time for Cause effective immediately upon delivery of written notice to Executive. As used herein, the term Cause shall mean:
(i) Executive shall have been convicted of a felony or any misdemeanor involving allegations of fraud, theft, perjury or conspiracy;
(ii) Executive is found disqualified or not suitable to hold a casino or other gaming license by a governmental gaming authority in any jurisdiction where Executive is required to be found qualified, suitable or licensed;
(iii) Executive materially breaches any material Company policy or any material term hereof, including, without limitation, Sections 4 through 7 and, in each case, fails to cure such breach within 15 days after receipt of written notice thereof; or
(iv) Executive misappropriates corporate funds as determined in good faith by the Board.
3.2. Termination by the Executive. Executive may voluntarily terminate employment for any reason effective upon 60 days prior written notice to the Company, unless the Company waives such notice requirement (in which case the Company shall notify Executive in writing as to the effective date of termination).
3.3. Termination for Death or Disability. In the event of the death or total disability of Executive, this Agreement shall terminate effective as of the date of Executives death or total disability. The term total disability shall have the definition set forth in the Companys Long Term Disability Insurance Policy in effect at the time of such determination.
3.4. Payments Due Upon Termination.
(a) Generally. Upon any termination described in Sections 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3 above, Executive shall be entitled to receive any amounts due for Base Salary earned or expenses incurred through the effective date of termination and any benefits accrued or earned on or prior to such date in accordance with the terms of any applicable benefit plans and programs.
(b) Certain Circumstances. In the event the Company terminates Executives employment without Cause or due to death or a total disability or in the event that the Company elects not to renew this Agreement, and subject to Executive executing the release attached
3
hereto as Exhibit A, Executive shall be entitled to receive the following in lieu of any other severance:
(i) Executive shall receive a payment equal to Executives monthly Base Salary at the highest rate in effect for Executive during the 24-month period immediately preceding the effective date of termination and Executives monthly bonus value (determined by dividing the highest amount of annual cash bonus compensation paid to Executive in respect of either the first or second full calendar year immediately preceding the effective date of termination by twelve) for a period equal to the greater of (1) the number of months remaining in the Employment Term or (2) 24 months (the Severance Period).
(ii) Executive shall continue to receive the health benefits coverage in effect on the effective date of termination (or as the same may be changed from time to time for Peer Executives) for Executive and, if any, Executives spouse and dependents for the Severance Period. At the option of the Company, the Company may elect to pay Executive cash in lieu of such coverage in an amount equal to Executives after-tax cost of obtaining generally comparable coverage for such period.
(iii) Executive shall continue to serve as a non-officer employee of the Company during the Severance Period and, as such, all options granted to Executive shall continue vesting for such period.
(c) Payments. Cash Payments due under this Section 3.4 shall be made as follows: 75% shall be made within 15 days of the effective date of termination and the balance shall be made in accordance with the payroll practices in effect on the date of termination, unless, at the Companys sole option, the Company elects to make all such payments in a single lump sum. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 3.4, Section 8 or Section 9, no other payments or benefits shall be due under this Agreement to Executive.
3.5. Notice of Termination. Any termination of Executives employment shall be communicated by a written notice of termination delivered within the time period specified in this Section 3. The notice of termination shall (i) indicate the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon, (ii) briefly summarize the facts and circumstances deemed to provide a basis for a termination of employment and the applicable provision hereof, and (iii) specify the termination date in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.
4. No Conflicts of Interest. Executive agrees that throughout the period of Executives employment hereunder or otherwise, Executive will not perform any activities or services, or accept other employment that would materially interfere with or present a conflict of interest concerning Executives employment with the Company. Executive agrees and acknowledges that Executives employment by the Company is conditioned upon Executive adhering to and complying with the business practices and requirements of ethical conduct set forth in writing from time to time by the Company in its employee manual or similar publication. Executive represents and warrants that no other contract, agreement or understanding to which Executive is a party or may be subject will be violated by the execution of this Agreement by Executive.
4
5. Confidentiality. Executive recognizes and acknowledges that Executive will have access to certain confidential information of the Company and that such information constitutes valuable, special and unique property of the Company (including, but not limited to, information such as business strategies, identity of acquisition or growth targets, marketing plans, customer lists, and other business related information for the Companys customers). Executive agrees that Executive will not, for any reason or purpose whatsoever, during or after the term of employment, disclose any of such confidential information to any party, and that Executive will keep inviolate and secret all confidential information or knowledge which Executive has access to by virtue of Executives employment with the Company, except as otherwise may be necessary in the ordinary course of performing Executives duties with the Company.
6. Non-Competition.
(a) As used herein, the term Restriction Period shall mean a period equal to the greater of (i) the remainder of the Employment Term in effect on the effective date of termination and (ii) the Severance Period, if applicable; provided, however, that, if on or before the Trigger Date, Executive has been terminated for one of the reasons contemplated by Section 3.4(b), Executive may elect to terminate the Restriction Period at any time following the first anniversary of the effective date of termination by delivering written notice to the Company that Executive has made such election and that, in consideration therefore, is waiving the right to receive any continued payments under Section 3.4(b).
(b) During Executives employment by the Company and for the duration of the Restriction Period thereafter, Executive shall not, except with the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, join, control, finance or participate in the ownership, management, operation, control or financing of, or be connected as an officer, director, employee, partner, principal, agent, representative, consultant or otherwise with, or use or permit Executives name to be used in connection with, any business or enterprise which owns or operates a gaming or pari-mutuel facility located within 150 miles of any gaming or pari-mutuel facility owned or operated by the Company or any of its affiliates.
(c) The foregoing restrictions shall not be construed to prohibit Executives ownership of less than 5% of any class of securities of any corporation which is engaged in any of the foregoing businesses and has a class of securities registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provided that such ownership represents a passive investment and that neither Executive nor any group of persons including Executive in any way, either directly or indirectly, manages or exercises control of any such corporation, guarantees any of its financial obligations, otherwise takes any part in its business, other than exercising Executives rights as a shareholder, or seeks to do any of the foregoing.
(d) Executive acknowledges that the covenants contained in Sections 5 through 7 hereof are reasonable and necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the Company and its affiliates and, in particular, that the duration and geographic scope of such covenants are reasonable given the nature of this Agreement and the position that Executive will hold within the Company. Executive further agrees to disclose the existence and terms of such covenants to any employer that Executive works for during the Restriction Period.
5
7. Non-Solicitation. During Executives employment by the Company and for a period equal to the greater of the Restriction Period or one year after the effective date of termination, Executive will not, except with the prior written consent of the Company, (i) directly or indirectly, solicit or hire, or encourage the solicitation or hiring of, any person who is, or was within a six month period prior to such solicitation or hiring, an executive or management employee of the Company or any of its affiliates for any position as an employee, independent contractor, consultant or otherwise or (ii) divert or attempt to divert any existing business of the Company or any of its affiliates.
8. Change of Control.
8.1. Consideration
(a) Change of Control. In the event of a Change of Control (as defined below), Executive shall be entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the product of three times the sum of (i) the highest annual rate of Base Salary in effect for Executive during the 24-month period immediately preceding the effective date of the Change in Control (the Trigger Date) and (ii) the highest amount of annual cash bonus compensation paid to Executive in respect of either the first or second full calendar year immediately preceding the Trigger Date.
(b) Restrictive Provisions. As consideration for the foregoing payments, Executive agrees not to challenge the enforceability of any of the restrictions contained in Sections 5, 6 or 7 of this Agreement upon or after the occurrence of a Change of Control. Executive and Company acknowledge that, as additional consideration for the change of control payments, Executive has also agreed to limit Executives ability to opt out of the Restriction Period in Section 6(a) to periods prior to the Trigger Date.
8.2. Payment Terms. This change of control payment shall be made in two lump sum payments as follows: (i) 75% to Executive on the Trigger Date; and (ii) 25% into a mutually acceptable escrow account on the Trigger Date, payable to Executive on the 90th day following the Trigger Date. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, the payment contemplated by clause (ii) shall be paid immediately upon the occurrence of any of the following: (a) Executives employment is terminated by the Company; or (b) Executive terminates employment for Good Reason (as defined below).
8.3. Certain Other Terms. In the event payments are being made to Executive under this Section 8, no payments shall be due under Section 3.4(b)(i) of this Agreement with respect to any termination of Executives employment following a Change of Control. At the option of the Company, the Company may require Executive to execute the release attached hereto as Exhibit A; provided, however, that this requirement shall not in any way alter the timing of the payments to be made under Section 8.2. The provisions of this Section 8 shall continue to apply to Executive if, during the 24-month period immediately preceding the Trigger Date, the Company terminates Executives employment without Cause or due to a total disability or the Company elects not to renew this Agreement; provided, however, that, in such event, any payments due under Section 8 shall be reduced by any prior payments made under Section 3.4(b)(i).
6
8.4. Defined Terms.
(a) Change of Control. The occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; (ii) the election of two (2) or more persons to the Board who do not constitute Continuing Directors; or (iii) the ownership or acquisition by any Person or Group of the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or direct the voting of securities having more than forty percent (40%) of the ordinary voting power for the election of directors of the Company.
(b) Good Reason. The occurrence of any of the following events that the Company fails to cure within 10 days after receiving written notice thereof from Executive: (i) assignment to Executive of any duties inconsistent in any material respect with Executives position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities or inconsistent with Executives legal or fiduciary obligations; (ii) any reduction in Executives compensation or substantial reduction in Executives benefits taken as a whole; (iii) any travel requirements materially greater than Executives travel requirements prior to the Change of Control; or (iv) breach of any material term of this Agreement by the Company.
(c) Continuing Directors. Any person who, as of the date of determination, either (i) was a member of the Board as of the date of this Agreement or (ii) was nominated for election or elected to the Board with the affirmative vote of a majority of directors comprising the Board or, if applicable, the Nominating Committee of the Board, who were Continuing Directors immediately prior to such nomination or election.
(d) Group. Any group of related Persons for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(e) Person. Any individual, partnership, joint venture, trust, corporation, limited liability entity, unincorporated organization or other entity (including a governmental entity).
9. Certain Tax Matters.
9.1. Generally. In the event Executive becomes entitled to receive the payments (the Severance Payments) provided under Section 3 or Section 8 hereof or under any other plan or arrangement providing for payments under circumstances similar to those contemplated by such sections, and if any of the Severance Payments will be subject to the tax (the Excise Tax) imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), the Company shall pay to Executive at the time specified for such payments, an additional amount (the Gross-Up Payment) such that the net amount retained by Executive shall be equal to the amount of the Severance Payments after deducting normal and ordinary taxes but not deducting (a) the Excise Tax and (b) any federal, state and local income tax and Excise Tax payable on the payment provided for by this Section 9.
9.2. Illustration. For example, if the Severance Payments are $1,000,000 and if Executive is subject to the Excise Tax, then the Gross-Up Payment will be such that Executive will retain an amount of $1,000,000 less only any normal and ordinary taxes on such amount.
7
The Excise Tax and federal, state and local taxes and any Excise Tax on the payment provided by this Section 9 will not be deemed normal and ordinary taxes.
9.3. Certain Terms. For purposes of determining whether any of the Severance Payments will be subject to the Excise Tax and the amount of such Excise Tax, the following will apply:
(a) Any other payments or benefits received or to be received by Executive in connection with a Change in Control of the Company or Executives termination of employment (whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or any other plan, arrangement or agreement with the Company shall be treated as parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, and all excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax, unless in the opinion of tax counsel selected by the Companys Compensation Committee and acceptable to Executive, such other payments or benefits (in whole or in part) do not constitute parachute payments, or such excess parachute payments (in whole or in part) represent reasonable compensation for services actually rendered within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code in excess of the base amount within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code, or are otherwise not subject to the Excise Tax;
(b) The amount of the Severance Payments which shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax shall be equal to the lesser of (y) the total amount of the Severance Payments or (z) the amount of excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) (after applying clause (a), above); and
(c) The value of any non-cash benefits or any deferred payment or benefit shall be determined by the Companys independent auditors in accordance with proposed, temporary or final regulations under Sections 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code or, in the absence of such regulations, in accordance with the principles of Section 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code. For purposes of determining the amount of the Gross-Up Payment, Executive shall be deemed to pay Federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income taxation in the calendar year in which the Gross-Up Payment is to be made and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rate of taxation in the state and locality of Executive on the Trigger Date, net of the maximum reduction in Federal income taxes which could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes. In the event that the amount of Excise Tax attributable to Severance Payments is subsequently determined to be less than the amount taken into account hereunder at the time of determination then, subject to applicable law, appropriate adjustments will be made with respect to the payments hereunder.
9.4. Fees and Expenses. The Company shall reimburse Executive for all reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by Executive in connection with any tax audit or proceeding to the extent attributable to the application of Section 4999 of the Code or any regulations pertaining thereto to any payment or benefit provided hereunder.
10. Document Surrender. Upon the termination of Executives employment for any reason, Executive shall immediately surrender and deliver to the Company all documents, correspondence and any other information, of any type whatsoever, from the Company or any of
8
its agents, servants, employees, suppliers, and existing or potential customers, that came into Executives possession by any means whatsoever, during the course of employment.
11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws (and not the law of conflicts) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
12. Jurisdiction. The parties hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which arises out of or relates to this Agreement and agree that any action instituted under this Agreement shall be commenced, prosecuted and continued only in the state or federal courts having jurisdiction for matters arising in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, which shall be the exclusive and only proper forum for adjudicating such a claim.
13. Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement or necessary or convenient in connection herewith shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when hand delivered, delivered by guaranteed next-day delivery or sent by facsimile (with confirmation of transmission) or shall be deemed given on the third business day when mailed by registered or certified mail, as follows (provided that notice of change of address shall be deemed given only when received):
If to the Company, to:
Penn National Gaming,
Inc.
825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200
Wyomissing, PA 19610
Fax: (610) 376-2842
Attention: Chairman
If to Executive, to:
Robert S. Ippolito
c/o Penn National Gaming, Inc.
825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200
Wyomissing, PA 19610
Fax: (610) 376-2842
or to such other names or addresses as the Company or Executive, as the case may be, shall designate by notice to each other person entitled to receive notices in the manner specified in this Section.
14. Contents of Agreement; Amendment and Assignment.
14.1. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings with respect to thereto, including without limitation, the Initial Agreement which is hereby terminated. This Agreement cannot be changed, modified, extended, waived or
9
terminated except upon a written instrument signed by the party against which it is to be enforced.
14.2. Executive may not assign any of his rights or obligations under this Agreement. The Company may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any successor to all or substantially all of its assets or business by means of liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, transfer of assets or otherwise.
15. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or application thereof to anyone or under any circumstances is adjudicated to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or application of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid or unenforceable provision or application and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision or application in any other jurisdiction. If any provision is held void, invalid or unenforceable with respect to particular circumstances, it shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect in all other circumstances. In addition, if any court determines that any part of Sections 5, 6 or 7 hereof is unenforceable because of its duration, geographical scope or otherwise, such court will have the power to modify such provision and, in its modified form, such provision will then be enforceable.
16. Remedies.
16.1. No remedy conferred upon a party by this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to any other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity.
16.2. No delay or omission by a party in exercising any right, remedy or power under this Agreement or existing at law or in equity shall be construed as a waiver thereof, and any such right, remedy or power may be exercised by such party from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient or necessary by such party in its sole discretion.
16.3. Executive acknowledges that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for any breach of this Agreement by Executive and that the Company shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive relief as remedies for any such breach, in addition to all other remedies available at law or equity to the Company.
17. Construction. This Agreement is the result of thoughtful negotiations and reflects an arms length bargain between two sophisticated parties, each represented by counsel. The parties agree that, if this Agreement requires interpretation, neither party should be considered the drafter nor be entitled to any presumption that ambiguities are to be resolved in his or her favor.
18. Beneficiaries/References. Executive shall be entitled, to the extent permitted under any applicable law, to select and change a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any compensation or benefit payable under this Agreement following Executives death by giving the Company written notice thereof. In the event of Executives death or a judicial determination of Executives incompetence, reference in this Agreement to Executive shall be deemed, where appropriate, to refer to Executives beneficiary, estate or other legal representative.
10
19. Withholding. All payments under this Agreement shall be made subject to applicable tax withholding, and the Company shall withhold from any payments under this Agreement all federal, state and local taxes, as the Company is required to withhold pursuant to any law or governmental rule or regulation. Except as specifically provided otherwise in this Agreement, Executive shall bear all expense of, and be solely responsible for, all federal, state and local taxes due with respect to any payment received under this Agreement.
20. Regulatory Compliance. The terms and provisions hereof shall be conditioned on and subject to compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations of all jurisdictions, or agencies, boards or commissions thereof, having regulatory jurisdiction over the employment or activities of Executive hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. |
|||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
By: |
/s/ Peter M. Carlino |
|
|
Name: Peter M. Carlino |
||
|
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
EXECUTIVE |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
/s/ Robert S. Ippolito |
|
|
|
Robert S. Ippolito |
11
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Peter M. Carlino, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penn National Gaming, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2007 |
/s/ Peter M. Carlino |
|
|
Peter M. Carlino |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
1
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, William J. Clifford, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penn National Gaming, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2007 |
/s/ William J. Clifford |
|
|
William J. Clifford |
|
|
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer |
1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter M. Carlino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
By: |
/s/ Peter M. Carlino |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter M. Carlino |
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2007 |
|
|
1
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Clifford, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
By: |
/s/ William J. Clifford |
|
|
|
|
William J. Clifford |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief |
|
|
|
May 10, 2007 |
1