SEC Filing | PENN Entertainment

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

penn_Current folio_10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-24206

PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania		23-2234473
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

825 Berkshire Blvd., Suite 200

Wyomissing, PA 19610

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

610-373-2400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☒		Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐		Smaller reporting company ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title		Outstanding as of October 28, 2016
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share		83,522,580 (includes 175,886 shares of restricted stock)

Table of Contents

Forward-looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variations of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties, including future plans, strategies, performance, developments, acquisitions, capital expenditures, and operating results. Actual results may vary materially from expectations. Although the Company believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Meaningful factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, but are not limited to, risks related to the following: the ability of our operating teams to drive revenue and adjusted EBITDA margins; our ability to obtain timely regulatory approvals required to own, develop and/or operate our facilities, or other delays, approvals or impediments to completing our planned acquisitions or projects, construction factors, including delays, unexpected remediation costs, local opposition, organized labor, and increased cost of labor and materials; the passage of state, federal or local legislation (including referenda) that would expand, restrict, further tax, prevent or negatively impact operations in or adjacent to the jurisdictions in which we do or seek to do business (such as a smoking ban at any of our facilities); the effects of local and national economic, credit, capital market, housing, and energy conditions on the economy in general and on the gaming and lodging industries in particular; the activities of our competitors and the rapid emergence of new competitors (traditional, internet, social, sweepstakes based and video gaming terminals (“VGTs”) in bars, truck stops and other retail establishments); increases in the effective rate of taxation at any of our properties or at the corporate level; our ability to identify attractive acquisition and development opportunities (especially in new business lines) and to agree to terms with, and maintain good relationships with partners/municipalities for such transactions; the costs and risks involved in the pursuit of such opportunities and our ability to complete the acquisition or development of, and achieve the expected returns from, such opportunities; our ability to maintain market share in established markets and ramp up operations at our recently opened facilities; our expectations for the continued availability and cost of capital; the outcome of pending legal proceedings, changes in accounting standards; the impact of weather; with regard to our recently completed restatement, risks relating the remediation of any material weaknesses and the costs to strengthen our internal control structure, potential investigations, litigation or other proceedings by governmental authorities, stockholders or other parties, and the risks related to the impact of the recent restatement of the Company’s financial statements on the Company’s reputation, development projects, joint ventures and other commercial contracts; the ability of the Company to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize its deferred tax assets; with respect to the recently opened Hollywood Casino-Jamul near San Diego, California, particular risks associated with the repayment or subordination of project loans, sovereign immunity, local opposition (including several pending lawsuits), access, regional competition and property performance; with respect to our Plainridge Park Casino in Massachusetts, the ultimate location and timing of the other gaming facilities in the state and region; with respect to our social and other interactive gaming endeavors, including our recent acquisition of Rocket Games, risks related to ultimate profitability, retention of certain key employees cyber-security, data privacy, intellectual property and legal and regulatory challenges; with respect to Prairie State Gaming, risks relating to the closing of a pending acquisition and the integration of all new acquisitions, our ability to successfully compete in the VGT market, our ability to retain existing customers and secure new customers, risks relating to municipal authorization of VGT operations and the implementation and the ultimate success of the products and services being offered; and other factors as discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by law.

Table of Contents

PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income —Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Deficit — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	8
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	28

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	46

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	46

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	48

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	48

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	48

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	48

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	48

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	48

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	48

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	49

SIGNATURES		50

EXHIBIT INDEX		51

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	201,768	$	237,009
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,131 and $2,428 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		43,209		45,186
Prepaid expenses		59,538		76,784
Other current assets		48,515		13,497
Total current assets		353,030		372,476
Property and equipment, net		2,844,992		2,980,068
Other assets
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates		158,304		168,149
Goodwill		993,633		911,942
Other intangible assets, net		431,989		391,442
Advances to the Jamul Tribe		360,938		197,722
Other assets		108,793		116,953
Total other assets		2,053,657		1,786,208
Total assets	$	5,251,679	$	5,138,752

Liabilities
Current liabilities
Current portion of financing obligation to GLPI	$	55,256	$	50,548
Current maturities of long-term debt		81,741		92,108
Accounts payable		60,823		72,816
Accrued expenses		94,511		93,666
Accrued interest		8,702		7,091
Accrued salaries and wages		80,697		98,671
Gaming, pari-mutuel, property, and other taxes		62,683		57,486
Insurance financing		675		3,125
Other current liabilities		107,809		82,263
Total current liabilities		552,897		557,774

Long-term liabilities
Long-term financing obligation to GLPI, net of current portion		3,471,453		3,514,080
Long-term debt, net of current maturities and debt issuance costs		1,589,216		1,618,851
Deferred income taxes		120,161		107,921
Noncurrent tax liabilities		28,212		—
Other noncurrent liabilities		43,602		18,169
Total long-term liabilities		5,252,644		5,259,021

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Series B Preferred stock ($.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015)		—		—
Series C Preferred stock ($.01 par value, 18,500 shares authorized, 6,931 and 8,624 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)		—		—
Common stock ($.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 85,609,228 and 83,056,668 shares issued, and 83,441,835 and 80,889,275 shares outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)		855		830
Treasury stock, at cost (2,167,393 shares held at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015)		(28,414)		(28,414)
Additional paid-in capital		1,007,504		988,686
Retained deficit		(1,530,313)		(1,634,591)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,494)		(4,554)
Total shareholders’ deficit		(553,862)		(678,043)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	5,251,679	$	5,138,752

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015

Revenues
Gaming	$	654,591	$	651,284	$	1,974,618	$	1,861,539
Food, beverage, hotel and other		147,554		124,721		429,792		350,905
Management service and licensing fees		3,130		2,871		8,567		7,614
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		8,820		—
Revenues		811,240		778,876		2,421,797		2,220,058
Less promotional allowances		(45,643)		(39,579)		(130,327)		(115,667)
Net revenues		765,597		739,297		2,291,470		2,104,391

Operating expenses
Gaming		336,669		334,219		1,011,187		942,730
Food, beverage, hotel and other		102,110		89,151		302,062		249,883
General and administrative		114,376		107,614		340,854		342,771
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		8,820		—
Depreciation and amortization		67,903		66,141		200,105		191,785
Insurance recoveries		(726)		—		(726)		—
Total operating expenses		626,297		597,125		1,862,302		1,727,169
Income from operations		139,300		142,172		429,168		377,222

Other income (expenses)
Interest expense		(114,349)		(111,406)		(345,548)		(329,550)
Interest income		8,202		3,083		20,039		7,396
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		3,505		3,759		11,662		11,895
Other		404		2,672		(1,978)		4,805
Total other expenses		(102,238)		(101,892)		(315,825)		(305,454)

Income from operations before income taxes		37,062		40,280		113,343		71,768
Income tax (benefit) provision		(9,473)		35,380		9,065		62,016
Net income	$	46,535	$	4,900	$	104,278	$	9,752

Earnings per common share:
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.52	$	0.06	$	1.16	$	0.11
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.51	$	0.05	$	1.14	$	0.11

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands) (unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	46,535	$	4,900	$	104,278	$	9,752
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment during the period		(212)		(1,487)		1,060		(2,664)
Other comprehensive (loss) income		(212)		(1,487)		1,060		(2,664)
Comprehensive income	$	46,323	$	3,413	$	105,338	$	7,088

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Deficit

(in thousands, except share data) (unaudited)


													Accumulated
									Additional		Retained		Other		Total
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Treasury		Paid-In		(Deficit)		Comprehensive		Shareholders’
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Stock		Capital		Earnings		(Loss) Income		Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2014	8,624	$	—	79,161,817	$	813	$	(28,414)	$	956,146	$	(1,635,277)	$	(1,282)	$	(708,014)
Share-based compensation arrangements, net of tax benefits of $10,143	—		—	1,353,264		13		—		24,711		—		—		24,724
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(2,664)		(2,664)
Net income	—		—	—		—		—		—		9,752		—		9,752
Balance, September 30, 2015	8,624	$	—	80,515,081	$	826	$	(28,414)	$	980,857	$	(1,625,525)	$	(3,946)	$	(676,202)

Balance, December 31, 2015	8,624	$	—	80,889,275	$	830	$	(28,414)	$	988,686	$	(1,634,591)	$	(4,554)	$	(678,043)
Share-based compensation arrangements, net of tax benefits of $8,510	—		—	859,560		8		—		18,835		—		—		18,843
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		1,060		1,060
Conversion of preferred stock	(1,693)		—	1,693,000		17		—		(17)		—		—		—
Net income	—		—	—		—		—		—		104,278		—		104,278
Balance, September 30, 2016	6,931	$	—	83,441,835	$	855	$	(28,414)	$	1,007,504	$	(1,530,313)	$	(3,494)	$	(553,862)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands) (unaudited)


Nine Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015

Operating activities
Net income	$	104,278	$	9,752
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		200,105		191,785
Amortization of items charged to interest expense		5,523		4,730
Change in fair values of contingent purchase price		(1,111)		(5,944)
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment and assets held for sale		(3,440)		801
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		(11,662)		(11,895)
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates		21,500		22,050
Deferred income taxes		2,059		50,460
Charge for stock-based compensation		4,554		6,446
Decrease (increase), net of businesses acquired
Accounts receivable		5,305		5,015
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(4,231)		6,288
Other assets		(1,157)		8,869
(Decrease) increase, net of businesses acquired
Accounts payable		(8,492)		4,763
Accrued expenses		(2,489)		1,248
Accrued interest		1,611		3,680
Accrued salaries and wages		(18,262)		(862)
Gaming, pari-mutuel, property and other taxes		5,499		15,041
Income taxes		22,711		1,666
Other current and noncurrent liabilities		(10,780)		(7,748)
Net cash provided by operating activities		311,521		306,145
Investing activities
Capital project expenditures, net of reimbursements		(14,482)		(125,169)
Capital maintenance expenditures		(51,431)		(41,866)
Advances to the Jamul Tribe		(167,863)		(64,228)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment and assets held for sale		13,212		389
Investment in joint ventures		—		(2,799)
Acquisition of businesses, gaming and other licenses, net of cash acquired		(56,748)		(450,170)
Net cash used in investing activities		(277,312)		(683,843)
Financing activities
Proceeds from exercise of options		5,654		8,069
Principal payments on financing obligation with GLPI		(37,920)		(35,452)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs		74,170		517,290
Principal payments on long-term debt		(102,234)		(92,885)
Payments of other long-term obligations		(13,387)		(3,307)
Payments of contingent purchase price		(1,793)		—
Proceeds from insurance financing		9,614		885
Payments on insurance financing		(12,064)		(12,212)
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		8,510		10,126
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(69,450)		392,514
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(35,241)		14,816
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		237,009		208,673
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	201,768	$	223,489

Supplemental disclosure
Interest expense paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	339,211	$	321,276
Income tax (refunds received)/taxes paid	$	(11,720)	$	879

Non-cash transactions: In January 2015, a repayment obligation for a hotel and event center near Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg was assumed by a subsidiary of the Company, which was financed through a loan with the City of Lawrenceburg Department of Redevelopment. This non-cash transaction increased property and equipment, net and total debt by $15.3 million. In conjunction with the purchase of Rocket Games on August 1, 2016, the Company increased its acquired assets and other current and noncurrent liabilities by $56.0 million for the fair value of the contingent purchase price consideration at the time of acquisition. The remaining portion of the purchase price was paid in cash.

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“Penn”) and together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a diversified, multi-jurisdictional owner and manager of gaming and racing facilities and video gaming terminal operations with a focus on slot machine entertainment. We have also recently expanded into social onling gaming offerings via our Penn Interative Ventures, LLC (“Penn Interactive Ventures”) division and our recent acquisition of Rocket Games, Inc. (“Rocket Games”). As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned, managed, or had ownership interests in twenty-six facilities in the following sixteen jurisdictions: Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia and Ontario, Canada.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penn and its subsidiaries. Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates, that do not meet the consolidation criteria of the authoritative guidance for voting interest, controlling interest or variable interest entities (“VIE”), are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses for the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. The notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 should be read in conjunction with these condensed consolidated financial statements. The December 31, 2015 financial information has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances

Gaming revenue consists mainly of slot and video lottery gaming machine revenue as well as to a lesser extent table game and poker revenue. Gaming revenue is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses, with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs, for "ticket-in, ticket-out" coupons in the customers' possession, and for accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots. Progressive slot machines, which contain base jackpots that increase at a progressive rate based on the number of coins played, are charged to revenue as the amount of the jackpots increases. Table game revenue is the aggregate of table drop adjusted for the change in aggregate table chip inventory. Table drop is the total dollar amount of the currency, coins, chips, tokens and outstanding markers (credit instruments) that are removed from the live gaming tables.

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue, including racing revenue, is recognized as services are performed. Racing revenue includes the Company’s share of pari-mutuel wagering on live races after payment of amounts returned as winning wagers, its share of wagering from import and export simulcasting, and its share of wagering from its off-

Table of Contents

track wagering facilities. Advance deposits on lodging are recorded as accrued liabilities until services are provided to the customer.

Revenue from the management service contract for Casino Rama is based upon contracted terms and is recognized when services are performed.

Revenues include reimbursable costs associated with the Company’s management agreement with the Jamul Indian Village of California (the “Jamul Tribe”), which represent amounts received or due pursuant to the Company’s management agreement for the reimbursement of expenses, primarily payroll costs, incurred on their behalf. The Company recognizes the reimbursable costs associated with this contract as revenue on a gross basis, with an offsetting amount charged to operating expense as it is the primary obligor for these costs.

Revenues are recognized net of certain sales incentives in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-50, “Revenue Recognition—Customer Payments and Incentives.” The Company records certain sales incentives and points earned in point-loyalty programs as a reduction of revenue.

The retail value of accommodations, food and beverage, and other services furnished to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances is primarily included in food, beverage and other expense.

The amounts included in promotional allowances for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)
Rooms	$	10,257	$	8,649	$	29,477	$	25,888
Food and beverage		32,977		28,245		94,295		82,896
Other		2,409		2,685		6,555		6,883
Total promotional allowances	$	45,643	$	39,579	$	130,327	$	115,667

The estimated cost of providing such complimentary services for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)
Rooms	$	1,419	$	1,085	$	3,954	$	2,999
Food and beverage		12,488		11,280		36,212		32,761
Other		909		881		2,563		2,605
Total cost of complimentary services	$	14,816	$	13,246	$	42,729	$	38,365

Gaming and Racing Taxes

The Company is subject to gaming and pari-mutuel taxes based on gross gaming revenue and pari-mutuel revenue in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company primarily recognizes gaming and pari-mutuel tax expense based on the statutorily required percentage of revenue that is required to be paid to state and local jurisdictions in the states where or in which wagering occurs. In certain states in which the Company operates, gaming taxes are based on graduated rates. The Company records gaming tax expense at the Company’s estimated effective gaming tax rate for the year, considering estimated taxable gaming revenue and the applicable rates. Such estimates are adjusted each interim period. If gaming tax rates change during the year, such changes are applied prospectively in the determination of

Table of Contents

gaming tax expense in future interim periods. Finally, the Company recognizes purse expense based on the statutorily required percentage of revenue that is required to be paid out in the form of purses to the winning owners of horse races run at the Company’s racetracks in the period in which wagering occurs. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, these expenses, which are recorded primarily within gaming expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income, were $257.0 million and $772.9 million, as compared to $259.4 million and $730.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Long-term asset related to the Jamul Tribe

On April 5, 2013, the Company announced that, subject to final National Indian Gaming Commission approval, it and the Jamul Tribe had entered into definitive agreements to jointly develop a Hollywood Casino-branded gaming facility on the Jamul Tribe’s trust land in San Diego County, California. The definitive agreements were entered into to: (i) secure the development, management, and branding services of the Company to assist the Jamul Tribe during the pre-development and entitlement phase of the project; (ii) set forth the terms and conditions under which the Company will provide a loan or loans to the Jamul Tribe to fund certain development costs; and (iii) create an exclusive arrangement between the parties.

The Jamul Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe holding a government-to-government relationship with the U.S. through the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs and possessing certain inherent powers of self-government. The Jamul Tribe is the beneficial owner of approximately six acres of reservation land located within the exterior boundaries of the State of California held by the U.S. in trust for the Jamul Tribe (the “Property”). The Jamul Tribe exercises jurisdiction over the Property pursuant to its powers of self-government and consistent with the resolutions and ordinances of the Jamul Tribe. The arrangement between the Jamul Tribe and the Company provides the Jamul Tribe with the expertise, knowledge and capacity of a proven developer and operator of gaming facilities and provides the Company with the exclusive right to administer and oversee planning, designing, development, construction management, and coordination during the development and construction of the project as well as the management of a gaming facility on the Property.

Hollywood Casino Jamul – San Diego is a three-story gaming and entertainment facility of approximately 200,000 square feet featuring 1,731 slot machines, 40 live table games, multiple restaurants, bars and lounges and a partially enclosed parking structure with over 1,800 spaces. In mid-January 2014, the Company commenced construction activities at the site. The facility opened to the public on October 10, 2016. The Company currently provides a portion of the financing to the Jamul Tribe in connection with the project and, following the opening, now manages and provides branding for the casino.

The Company is accounting for the development agreement and related loan commitment letter with the Jamul Tribe as a loan (the “Senior Loans”) with accrued interest in accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables.” The Senior Loans represent initial advances made by the Company to the Jamul Tribe for the development and construction of a gaming facility for the Jamul Tribe on reservation land. As such, the Jamul Tribe owns the casino and its related assets and liabilities. San Diego Gaming Ventures, LLC (“SDGV”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a separate legal entity and, following completion of the project and subsequent commencement of gaming operations on the Property, will be the Penn entity which receives management and licensing fees from the Jamul Tribe. The Company’s Senior Loans with the Jamul Tribe totaled $360.9 million and $197.7 million, which includes accrued interest of $33.2 million, and $13.9 million, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Collectability of the Senior Loans will be derived from the revenues of the casino operations. The Company believes collectability of the Senior Loans is highly certain. However, in the event that projections related to the profitability of the property are inaccurate, the Company may be required to record a reserve related to the collectability of the Senior Loans. Subsequent to September 30, 2016, the Company was repaid a significant amount of the advances to the Jamul Tribe. See Note 12 for further details.

The Company considered whether the arrangement with the Jamul Tribe represents a variable interest that should be accounted for pursuant to the VIE subsections of ASC 810. The Company noted that the scope and scope exceptions of ASC 810-10-15-12(e) states that a reporting entity shall not consolidate a government organization or financing entity established by a government organization (other than certain financing entities established to circumvent

Table of Contents

the provisions of the VIE subsections of ASC 810). Based on the status of the Jamul Tribe as a government organization, the Company believes its arrangement with the Jamul Tribe is not within the scope defined by ASC 810.

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”). Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the additional dilution for all potentially-dilutive securities such as stock options and unvested restricted shares.

At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had outstanding 6,931 and 8,624, respectively, shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, 516 and 1,693 shares, respectively, of Series C Preferred Stock were sold by the holders of these securities, which converted into 516,000 and 1,693,000 shares, respectively, of common stock under previously agreed upon terms. The Company determined that the preferred stock qualified as a participating security as defined in ASC 260 since these securities participate in dividends with the Company’s common stock. In accordance with ASC 260, a company is required to use the two-class method when computing EPS when a company has a security that qualifies as a “participating security.” The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. A participating security is included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, basic EPS for the Company’s common stock is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock is computed using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted method.

The following table sets forth the allocation of net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 under the two-class method:


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)

Net income	$	46,535	$	4,900	$	104,278	$	9,752
Net income applicable to preferred stock		3,658		476		9,268		951
Net income applicable to common stock	$	42,877	$	4,424	$	95,010	$	8,801

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic EPS to the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:


	Three Months Ended September 30,	Three Months Ended September 30,	Nine Months Ended September 30,	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016	2015	2016	2015
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Determination of shares:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	83,065	80,243	81,917	79,803
Assumed conversion of dilutive employee stock-based awards	1,233	2,355	1,381	2,307
Assumed conversion of restricted stock	38	58	41	60
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding before participating security	84,336	82,656	83,339	82,170
Assumed conversion of preferred stock	7,086	8,624	7,991	8,624
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	91,422	91,280	91,330	90,794

Options to purchase 2,990,243 shares and 1,621,219 shares were outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because they were antidilutive.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Calculation of basic EPS:
Net income applicable to common stock	$	42,877	$	4,424	$	95,010	$	8,801
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		83,065		80,243		81,917		79,803
Basic EPS	$	0.52	$	0.06	$	1.16	$	0.11

Calculation of diluted EPS using two-class method:
Net income applicable to common stock	$	42,877	$	4,424	$	95,010	$	8,801
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding before participating security		84,336		82,656		83,339		82,170
Diluted EPS	$	0.51	$	0.05	$	1.14	$	0.11

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock compensation under ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant.

Table of Contents

The fair value for stock options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires management to make certain assumptions. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury spot rate with a term equal to the expected life assumed at the date of grant. Expected volatility was estimated based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a period of 5.40 years, in order to match the expected life of the options at the grant date. Historically, at the grant date, there has been no expected dividend yield assumption since the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in May 1994 and since the Company intends to retain all of its earnings to finance the development of its business for the foreseeable future. The weighted-average expected life was based on the contractual term of the stock option and expected employee exercise dates, which was based on the historical and expected exercise behavior of the Company’s employees. The Company granted 1,573,651 stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.5 million and $4.6 million, as compared to $2.0 million and $6.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and is included within the condensed consolidated statements of income under general and administrative expense.

The Company’s cash-settled phantom stock unit awards (“PSUs”), which vest over a period of three to four years, entitle employees and directors to receive cash based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date. The PSUs are accounted for as liability awards and are re-measured at fair value each reporting period until they become vested with compensation expense being recognized over the requisite service period in accordance with ASC 718-30, “Compensation—Stock Compensation, Awards Classified as Liabilities.” The Company had a liability, which is included in accrued salaries and wages within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, associated with its PSUs of $2.9 million and $7.8 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. For PSUs held by Penn employees, there was $8.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost at September 30, 2016 that will be recognized over the grants remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.45 years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $2.1 million and $5.7 million of compensation expense associated with these awards, as compared to $1.9 million and $11.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. The changes are primarily due to volatility in stock price year-over-year for both Penn and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., (“GLPI”) awards held by Penn employees. Amounts paid by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 on these cash-settled awards totaled $5.4 million and $9.9 million, as compared to $7.6 million and $12.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

For the Company’s stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), the fair value of the SARs is calculated during each reporting period and estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the various inputs discussed below. The Company’s SARs, which vest over a period of four years, are accounted for as liability awards since they will be settled in cash. The Company had a liability, which is included in accrued salaries and wages within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, associated with its SARs of $7.1 million and $8.0 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. For SARs held by Penn employees, there was $4.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost at September 30, 2016 that will be recognized over the awards remaining weighted average vesting period of 2.72 years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized compensation expense of $0.4 million and $1.8 million associated with these awards, as compared to a credit of $3.0 million and compensation expense of $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. The changes are primarily due to volatility in stock price year-over-year for both Penn and GLPI awards held by Penn employees. Amounts paid by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 on these cash-settled awards totaled $1.0 million and $2.5 million, as compared to $0.3 million and $2.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Table of Contents

The following are the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock option awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:


	2016		2015

Risk-free interest rate	1.20	%	1.53	%
Expected volatility	31.23	%	36.84	%
Dividend yield	—		—
Weighted-average expected life (years)	5.40		5.45

Segment Information

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, who is the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), as that term is defined in ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), measures and assesses the Company’s business performance based on regional operations of various properties grouped together based primarily on their geographic locations. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company changed its three reportable segments from East/Midwest, West and Southern Plains to Northeast, South/West, and Midwest in connection with the addition of a new regional vice president and a realignment of responsibilities within our segments. This realignment changed the manner in which information is provided to the CODM and therefore how performance is assessed and resources are allocated to the business.

The Northeast reportable segment consists of the following properties: Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races, Hollywood Casino Bangor, Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, Hollywood Casino Toledo, Hollywood Casino Columbus, Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway, Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course, and Plainridge Park Casino, which opened on June 24, 2015. It also includes the Company’s Casino Rama management service contract.

The South/West reportable segment consists of the following properties: Zia Park Casino, Hollywood Casino Tunica, Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast, Boomtown Biloxi, M Resort, and Tropicana Las Vegas, which was acquired on August 25, 2015, as well as the Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego project with the Jamul Tribe, which opened on October 10, 2016.

The Midwest reportable segment consists of the following properties: Hollywood Casino Aurora, Hollywood Casino Joliet, Argosy Casino Alton, Argosy Casino Riverside, Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg, Hollywood Casino St. Louis, and Prairie State Gaming, which the Company acquired on September 1, 2015, and includes the Company’s 50% investment in Kansas Entertainment, LLC (“Kansas Entertainment”), which owns the Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway.

The Other category consists of the Company’s standalone racing operations, namely Rosecroft Raceway, which was sold on July 31, 2016, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, and the Company’s joint venture interests in Sam Houston Race Park, Valley Race Park, and Freehold Raceway. If the Company is successful in obtaining gaming operations at these locations, they would be assigned to one of the Company’s regional executives and reported in their respective reportable segment. The Other category also includes the Company’s corporate overhead operations, which does not meet the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280. Additionally, Penn Interactive Ventures, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary which represents its social online gaming initiatives, including the recently acquired Rocket Games, would meet the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280, but is quantatively not significant to the Company’s operations as it represents 0.5% of net revenues and 0.4% of income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

extinguishment charges, impairment charges, insurance recoveries and deductible charges, depreciation and amortization, changes in the estimated fair value of contingent purchase price, gain or loss on disposal of assets, and other income or expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is also inclusive of income or loss from unconsolidated affiliates, with the Company’s share of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization) added back for its joint venture in Kansas Entertainment. Adjusted EBITDA excludes payments associated with our Master Lease agreement with GLPI as the transaction is accounted for as a financing obligation. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to operating income, as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of liquidity, or as any other measure of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company has significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, taxes and debt principal repayments, which are not reflected in adjusted EBITDA.

See Note 8 for further information with respect to the Company’s segments.

Other Comprehensive Income

The Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes standards for the reporting and presentation of comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements. The Company presents comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the only component of accumulated other comprehensive income was foreign currency translation adjustments.

Table of Contents

3. New Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). The amendments are intended to address diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments provide guidance on the following specific cash flow issues: (a) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (b) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; (c) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (d) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (e) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (f) distributions received from equity method investees; (g) beneficial interest in securitization transactions; and (h) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of these amendments will have on its consolidated statement of cash flows and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which impacts virtually all aspects of an entity’s revenue recognition. The core principle of Topic 606 is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the standard by one year which results in the new standard being effective for the Company at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2018. In addition, during March, April and May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, respectively, which clarified the guidance on certain items such as reporting revenue as a principal versus agent, identifying performance obligations, accounting for intellectual property licenses, assessing collectability and presentation of sales taxes. Management has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of the new standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Although the Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, we do believe it will result in changes to our accounting for loyalty points that are earned by our customers. The Company’s Marquee Rewards program allows customers, who are members and utilize their rewards membership card to earn promotional points that are redeemable for slot play and complimentaries. The accumulated points can be redeemed for food and beverages at our restaurants, and products offered at our retail stores across the vast majority of Penn’s casino properties. The estimated liability for unredeemed points is currently accrued based on expected redemption rates and the estimated costs of the services or merchandise to be provided. Under the new standard, we will need to defer the full retail value of the complimentaries until the future revenue transaction occurs. Although the exact amount of the increase to our point liabilities has not yet been determined, we do not anticipate it will have a significant impact on our earnings.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The amendments are intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period. Management plans to implement this change in accounting principle in 2017 and does not anticipate a material impact from this new guidance.

Table of Contents

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which will require, among other items, lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most leases. Extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures, including significant judgments made by management, will be required to provide greater insight into the extent of revenue and expense recognized and expected to be recognized from existing contracts. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the current standard. The standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach and provides for certain practical expedients. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Management has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of the new standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, the Company has numerous operating leases which, under the new standard, will need to be reported as an asset and a liability on its balance sheet. The precise amount of this asset and liability will be determined based on the leases that exist at the Company on the date of adoption.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02 with new consolidation guidance which modifies the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The main provisions of the new guidance include modifying the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, the evaluation of fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, and the effect of fee arrangements and related parties on the primary beneficiary determination, as well as provides a scope exception for certain investment funds. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the new guidance retrospectively. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2016 and it had no impact to the Company’s financial statements.

4. Acquisitions

On August 1, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity securities of social casino game developer, Rocket Games, for initial cash consideration of $59.1 million subject to customary working capital adjustments. The Stock Purchase Agreement includes contingent consideration payments over the next two years that will be based on a multiple of 6.25 times Rocket Games’ then-trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, subject to a cap of $110 million. Up to $10 million of the contingent consideration is accounted for as compensation as it is tied to continued employment over a two year period. The acquisition was funded by Penn with cash on hand and revolving commitments under the Company’s senior secured credit facility. The preliminary fair value of the contingent purchase price was estimated to be $56.0 million at the acquisition date based on an income approach by applying an option pricing method to the Company’s internal earning projections using a Monte Carlo simulation. The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $81.7 million, other intangible assets of $43.4 million, current assets of $7.7 million, other assets of $0.3 million, current contingent consideration liabilities of $28.2 million, other current liabilities of $5.9 million, non-current contingent consideration liabilities of $27.8 million and deferred tax liabilities of $12.1 million. Contingent consideration, goodwill, other intangible assts and the related deferred tax liabilities are provisional amounts as of September 30, 2016. This acquisition complements Penn’s interactive gaming strategy through its wholly-owned subsidiary Penn Interactive Ventures which is included in the Other category.

Table of Contents

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net, consists of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
	(in thousands)

Property and equipment - non-leased
Land and improvements	$	289,159	$	288,910
Building and improvements		402,532		396,497
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		1,351,761		1,303,153
Leasehold improvements		109,882		129,012
Construction in progress		14,491		9,175
		2,167,825		2,126,747
Less Accumulated depreciation		(1,200,804)		(1,093,115)
		967,021		1,033,632
Property and equipment - master lease
Land and improvements		382,246		382,246
Building and improvements		2,219,018		2,219,018
		2,601,264		2,601,264
Less accumulated depreciation		(723,293)		(654,828)
		1,877,971		1,946,436
Property and equipment, net	$	2,844,992	$	2,980,068

Property and equipment, net decreased by $135.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to depreciation expense, which is partially offset by improvements at Tropicana Las Vegas, and normal capital maintenance expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Depreciation expense, for property and equipment including assets under capital leases, totaled $65.5 million and $196.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, of which $22.7 million and $68.4 million related to assets under the Master Lease, respectively. No interest was capitalized in connection with major construction projects for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0 and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

6. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt, net of current maturities, is as follows:


	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
	(in thousands)

Senior secured credit facility	$	1,232,818	$	1,259,740
$300 million 5.875 % senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2021		300,000		300,000
Other long-term obligations		154,469		146,992
Capital leases		2,215		28,466
		1,689,502		1,735,198
Less current maturities of long-term debt		(81,741)		(92,108)
Less net discounts		(636)		(686)
Less debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $18.7 million and $13.3 million, respectively		(17,909)		(23,553)
	$	1,589,216	$	1,618,851

Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of future minimum repayments of long-term debt as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):


Within one year	$	81,631
1-3 years		966,934
3-5 years		285,048
Over 5 years		355,889
Total minimum payments	$	1,689,502

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On April 28, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to amend its senior secured credit facility. In August 2015, the amendment to the senior secured credit facility went into effect increasing the capacity under an existing five year revolver from $500 million to $633.2 million and increased the existing five year $500 million Term Loan A facility by $146.7 million. The seven year $250 million Term Loan B facility remained unchanged. At September 30, 2016, the Company’s senior secured credit facility had a gross outstanding balance of $1,232.8 million, consisting of a $555.7 million Term Loan A facility, a $243.1 million Term Loan B facility, and $434.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility. Additionally, at September 30, 2016, the Company had conditional obligations under letters of credit issued pursuant to the senior secured credit facility with face amounts aggregating $23.0 million, resulting in $176.2 million of available borrowing capacity as of September 30, 2016 under the revolving credit facility.

Corporate Airplane Loan

On September 30, 2016, the Company acquired a previously leased corporate airplane and financed the purchase price with an amortizing loan at a fixed interest rate of 5.22% for a term of five years with monthly payments of $220 thousand and a balloon payment of $12.6 million at the end of the loan term. This loan is included with other long-term obligations.

Covenants

The Company’s senior secured credit facility and $300 million 5.875% senior unsecured notes require it, among other obligations, to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial tests, including fixed charge coverage, interest coverage, senior leverage and total leverage ratios. In addition, the Company’s senior secured credit facility and $300 million 5.875% senior unsecured notes restrict, among other things, its ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, amend debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, make investments, engage in mergers or consolidations, and otherwise restrict corporate activities.

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants.

7. Master Lease Financing Obligation

The Company’s Master Lease with GLPI is accounted for as a financing obligation. The obligation was calculated at the inception of the transaction based on the future minimum lease payments due to GLPI under the Master Lease discounted at 9.70%, which represents the estimated incremental borrowing rate over the lease term, including renewal options that were reasonably assured of being exercised and the funded construction of certain leased real estate assets in development at the date of the Spin-Off. Total payments under the Master Lease were $109.7 million and $331.9 million and $109.0 million and $327.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The interest expense recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $97.4 million and $293.9 million as compared to $97.8 million and $291.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

Table of Contents

8. Segment Information

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company changed its three reportable segments from East/Midwest, West and Southern Plains to Northeast, South/West, and Midwest in connection with the addition of a new regional vice president and a realignment of responsibilities within the Company’s segments. Segment information for prior periods has been restated for comparability. The following tables (in thousands) present certain information with respect to the Company’s segments. Intersegment revenues between the Company’s segments were not material in any of the periods presented below. The income (loss) from operations by segment presented below does not include allocations for corporate overhead costs or expenses associated with utilizing property subject to the Master Lease.


Three months ended September 30, 2016	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	101,752	$	19,337	$	56,343	$	(38,132)	$	139,300
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		1,517		1,517
Depreciation and amortization		22,975		9,097		9,593		26,238		67,903
Contingent purchase price		(293)		—		—		263		(30)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		(13)		72		64		(2,904)		(2,781)
Insurance recoveries		—		—		(726)		—		(726)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		3,798		(293)		3,505
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		2,572		—		2,572
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124,421	$	28,506	$	71,644	$	(13,311)	$	211,260

Three months ended September 30, 2015	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	107,148	$	22,307	$	52,521	$	(39,804)	$	142,172
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		2,025		2,025
Depreciation and amortization		24,350		6,971		9,984		24,836		66,141
Contingent purchase price		(6,651)		—		—		—		(6,651)
Loss on disposal of assets		33		185		34		24		276
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		3,831		(72)		3,759
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		2,540		—		2,540
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124,880	$	29,463	$	68,910	$	(12,991)	$	210,262

Table of Contents


Nine months ended September 30, 2016	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	306,368	$	72,944	$	172,013	$	(122,157)	$	429,168
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		4,554		4,554
Depreciation and amortization		69,177		26,701		28,621		75,606		200,105
Contingent purchase price		(1,374)		—		—		263		(1,111)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		(6)		58		18		(3,510)		(3,440)
Insurance recoveries		—		—		(726)		—		(726)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		12,261		(599)		11,662
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		7,713		—		7,713
Adjusted EBITDA	$	374,165	$	99,703	$	219,900	$	(45,843)	$	647,925

Nine months ended September 30, 2015	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	274,995	$	81,910	$	160,631	$	(140,314)	$	377,222
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		6,446		6,446
Depreciation and amortization		70,016		17,091		29,846		74,832		191,785
Contingent purchase price		(5,944)		—		—		—		(5,944)
Loss on disposal of assets		40		585		28		148		801
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		12,021		(126)		11,895
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		7,818		—		7,818
Adjusted EBITDA	$	339,107	$	99,586	$	210,344	$	(59,014)	$	590,023

Table of Contents


		Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
	(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2016
Net revenues	$	395,748	$	135,169	$	221,172	$	13,508	$	765,597
Capital expenditures		6,465		7,540		7,438		936		22,379

Three months ended September 30, 2015
Net revenues	$	406,552	$	118,266	$	209,115	$	5,364	$	739,297
Capital expenditures		39,272		3,089		3,707		478		46,546

Nine months ended September 30, 2016
Net revenues	$	1,190,469	$	411,245	$	662,506	$	27,250	$	2,291,470
Capital expenditures		21,852		21,851		19,768		2,442		65,913

Nine months ended September 30, 2015
Net revenues	$	1,120,272	$	345,516	$	622,652	$	15,951	$	2,104,391
Capital expenditures		136,587		12,948		14,922		2,578		167,035

Balance sheet at September 30, 2016
Total assets		854,583		1,109,773		1,059,591		2,227,732		5,251,679
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates		79		—		94,369		63,856		158,304
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		324,285		224,746		748,952		127,639		1,425,622

Balance sheet at December 31, 2015
Total assets		918,292		968,152		1,091,514		2,160,794		5,138,752
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates		84		—		103,608		64,457		168,149
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		324,285		224,746		750,127		4,226		1,303,384

(1) Includes depreciation expense associated with the real property assets under the Master Lease with GLPI. In addition, total assets include these assets. The interest expense associated with the financing obligation is reflected in the other category. Net revenues and income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates relate to the Company’s stand-alone racing operations, namely Rosecroft Raceway, which was sold during the quarter, Sanford Orlando Kennel Club and the Company’s Texas and New Jersey joint ventures which do not have gaming operations. Other also includes the recently created Penn Interactive Ventures, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary that is pursuing our new interactive gaming strategy and our recent acquisition of Rocket Games.

9. Income Taxes

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a net deferred tax liability balance of $120.2 million and $107.9 million, respectively, within its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and are measured at the prevailing enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences are settled or realized. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company concluded that as a result of the failed spin-off-leaseback accounting treatment which resulted in a significant increase to its deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance should be recorded on the Company’s deferred tax assets given the significant negative evidence associated with being in or expecting to be in a three year cumulative pre-tax loss position and the insufficient objectively verifiable positive evidence to support the realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have a valuation allowance which totaled $817.9 million and $844.3 million, respectively, only on the portion of the deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be unrealized as a result of the negative objective evidence of being in a three year cumulative loss.

Table of Contents

The Company calculates the provision for income taxes during interim reporting periods by applying an estimate of the annual effective tax rate (“ETR”) to the full year projected pretax book income or loss excluding certain discrete items. The Company’s ETR (income taxes as a percentage of income from operations before income taxes) including discrete items was (25.56)% and 8.00% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to 87.84% and 86.41% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to a year-over-year reduction to our federal and state valuation allowance coupled with an increase to earnings before income taxes. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2016, we had an income tax benefit of $12.0 million due to the recording of net deferred tax liabilities associated with intangible assets from our Rocket Games acquisition which reduced our valuation allowance need. Finally, the Company reached a tax settlement on our ongoing U.S. and Canadian Competent Authority case during the three months ended September 30, 2016 which resulted in a $9.8 million tax benefit.

10. Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach, and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate:

Cash and cash equivalents

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximates the carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, due to the short maturity of the cash equivalents.

Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s Term Loan A and B components of its senior secured credit facility and senior unsecured notes is estimated based on quoted prices in active markets and as such is a Level 1 measurement. The fair value of the remainder of the Company’s senior secured credit facility approximates its carrying value as it is revolving, variable rate debt and as such is a Level 2 measurement.

Other long term obligations at September 30, 2016, included the relocation fees for Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course and the repayment obligation of a hotel and event center located near Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg. The fair value of the relocation fees for Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course approximates its carrying value as the discount rate of 5.0% approximates the market rate of similar debt instruments and as such is a Level 2 measurement. Finally, the fair value of the repayment obligation for the hotel and event center is estimated based on a rate consistent with comparable municipal bonds and as such is a Level 2 measurement. See Note 6 for further details regarding the Company’s other long term obligations.

Table of Contents

Other liabilities

Other liabilities at September 30, 2016 included the contingent purchase price consideration related to the purchase of Plainridge Racecourse and Rocket Games. The fair value of the Company’s contingent purchase price consideration related to its Plainridge Racecourse acquisition is estimated based on a discounted cash flow model and as such is a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of the Company’s contingent purchase price consideration related to its Rocket Games acquisition is estimated by applying an option pricing method using a Monte Carlo simulation which is a quantitative technique that estimates the distribution of an outcome variable that depends on probabilistic input variables and as such is a Level 3 measurement. At each reporting period, the Company assesses the fair value of these liabilities and changes in their fair values are recorded in earnings. The amount related to the change in fair value of these obligations resulted in a reduction to general and administrative expense of $0.3 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to a reduction of $6.7 million and $5.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values by input level of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016
	Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	201,868	$	201,868	$	201,868	$	—	$	—
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt
Senior secured credit facility		1,217,420		1,231,429		797,429		434,000		—
Senior unsecured notes		296,734		310,500		310,500		—		—
Other long-term obligations		154,469		157,561		—		157,561		—
Other liabilities		66,610		66,610		—		—		66,610


	December 31, 2015
	Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	237,009	$	237,009	$	237,009	$	—	$	—
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt
Senior secured credit facility		1,239,049		1,251,975		829,975		422,000		—
Senior unsecured notes		296,252		291,000		291,000		—		—
Other long-term obligations		146,992		147,358		—		147,358		—
Other liabilities		13,815		13,815		—		—		13,815

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2016
	Liabilities
	Contingent
	Purchase Price
Balance at January 1, 2016	$	13,815

Additions		55,963
Payments		(1,793)
Included in earnings		(1,375)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	66,610

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in calculating fair value for our Level 3 liabilities:


	Valuation	Unobservable
	Technique	Input	Discount Rate		Volatility Rate
Contingent purchase price - Plainridge	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	8.30	%	N/A	%
Contingent purchase price - Rocket Games	Option Pricing Method	Discount rate, Volatility rate	9.00	%	88.50	%

11. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates

The Company has a 50% investment in Kansas Entertainment, which is a joint venture with International Speedway Corporation (“International Speedway”). Kansas Entertainment owns Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway which is a Hollywood themed facility featuring 244,791 of property square footage with 2,000 slot machines, 40 table games and 12 poker tables, a 1,253 space parking structure, as well as a variety of dining and entertainment facilities. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company’s investment in Kansas Entertainment met the requirements of S-X Rule 4-08(g) to provide summarized financial information. The following table provides summary income statement information for Kansas Entertainment as required under S-X Rule 1-02(bb) for the comparative periods presented in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income.


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net revenues	$	37,513	$	37,326	$	115,267	$	116,066
Operating expenses		29,917		29,663		90,746		92,025
Income from operations		7,596		7,663		24,521		24,041
Net income	$	7,596	$	7,663	$	24,521	$	24,041

Net income attributable to Penn	$	3,798	$	3,831	$	12,261	$	12,020

12. Subsequent Events

On October 20, 2016, the Jamul Tribe obtained long term secured financing, consisting of revolving and term loan credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) totaling approximately $460 million. The Credit Facilities, all of which are due in 2022, consist of a $5 million revolving credit facility, a $340 million term loan B facility and a $98 million term loan C facility. The revolving credit facility was provided by various commercial banks; the term loan B facility is held by an affiliate of Och-Ziff Real Estate; and the term loan C facility is held by the Company. The Company will also provide up to an additional $15 million of delayed draw term loan C commitments to fund certain roadway improvement costs. The various Credit Facilities rank pari passu with each other. However, if, on the first anniversary of the opening of Hollywood Casino Jamul – San Diego (“the Casino”), the Jamul Tribe has not achieved a senior secured net leverage ratio equal to or less than 5.0 to 1.0, then all or a portion of the term loan C facility will become subordinated to the other Credit Facilities to the extent necessary such that, after giving effect to such conversion, such senior secured net leverage ratio is 5.0 to 1.0. The rights of the Company to receive management and intellectual property license fees are subordinated to the claims of the lenders under the Credit Facilities and are subject to certain conditions contained in the Credit Facilities.

The Company was repaid on October 20, 2016, approximately $274 million of the advances to the Jamul Tribe for the development and construction of the property as well as previously purchased Jamul Tribal debt. The Company used these funds to reduce borrowings under its revolving credit facility.

As a condition to the availability of the Credit Facilities, the Company provided a limited completion guarantee, in favor of the administrative agent under the Credit Facilities, to provide up to $15 million of additional loans related to

Table of Contents

the construction and opening of the Casino, as well as certain post opening construction costs. Of these loans, $10 million may be funded under the Credit Facilities as part of the term loan C facility, while any additional loans would be subordinated loans. The term loan C facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 8.50% with a 1% LIBOR floor (or, at the Jamul Tribe’s election, a base rate determined by reference to the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate or LIBOR, as applicable, plus 7.50%), and the subordinated loans will bear interest at 14.0% (with 12.0% to be paid in cash and 2.0% to be paid-in-kind).

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Operations

We are a leading, diversified, multi-jurisdictional owner and manager of gaming and racing facilities and video gaming terminal operations. We have also recently expanded into social onling gaming offerings via our Penn Interative Ventures division and our recent acquisition of Rocket Games. As of September 30, 2016, we owned, managed, or had ownership interests in twenty-six facilities in the following sixteen jurisdictions: Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia, and Ontario, Canada. We believe that our portfolio of assets provides us the benefit of geographically diversified cash flow from operations.

On June 24, 2015, we opened Plainridge Park Casino, an integrated racing and slots-only gaming facility in Plainville, Massachusetts. On August 25, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and Casino (“Tropicana Las Vegas”) in Las Vegas, Nevada. On September 1, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Illinois Gaming Investors, LLC (d/b/a Prairie State Gaming), one of the largest video gaming terminal route operators in Illinois. In addition, we have developed and are now managing Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego on the Jamul Indian Village land in trust near San Diego, California, which opened on October 10, 2016. Finally, we recently implemented our interactive gaming strategy through our subsidiary, Penn Interactive Ventures, which included launching our HollywoodCasino.com Play4Fun social gaming platform with Scientific Games and our HollywoodSlots.com mobile social gaming platform with OpenWager. On August 1, 2016, we completed our acquisition of Rocket Games, a leading developer of social casino games.

The vast majority of our revenue is gaming revenue, derived primarily from gaming on slot machines (which represented approximately 86% and 84% of our gaming revenue in 2015 and 2014, respectively) and to a lesser extent, table games, which is highly dependent upon the volume and spending levels of customers at our properties. Other revenues are derived from our management service fee from Casino Rama and Hollywood Casino Jamul – San Diego, our hotels, dining, retail, admissions, program sales, concessions and certain other ancillary activities, and our racing operations. Our racing revenue includes our share of pari-mutuel wagering on live races after payment of amounts returned as winning wagers, our share of wagering from import and export simulcasting, and our share of wagering from our off-track wagering facilities.

Key performance indicators related to gaming revenue are slot handle and table game drop (volume indicators) and “win” or “hold” percentage. Our typical property slot hold percentage is in the range of 6% to 10% of slot handle, and our typical table game win percentage is in the range of 14% to 27% of table game drop. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the period cited. The win or hold percentage is the net amount of gaming wins and losses, with liabilities recognized for accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots. Our slot hold percentages have consistently been in the 6% to 10% range over the past several years. Given the stability in our slot hold percentages, we have not experienced significant impacts to earnings from changes in these percentages.

For table games, customers usually purchase cash chips at the gaming tables. The cash and markers (extensions of credit granted to certain credit worthy customers) are deposited in the gaming table’s drop box. Table game win is the amount of drop that is retained and recorded as casino gaming revenue, with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs and for unredeemed gaming chips. As we are primarily focused on regional gaming markets, our table win percentages are fairly stable as the majority of these markets do not regularly experience high-end play, which can lead to volatility in win percentages. Therefore, changes in table game win percentages do not typically have a material impact to our earnings.

Our properties generate significant operating cash flow, since most of our revenue is cash-based from slot machines, table games, and pari-mutuel wagering. Our business is capital intensive, and we rely on cash flow from our properties to generate operating cash to satisfy our obligations under the Master Lease, repay debt, fund capital maintenance expenditures, fund new capital projects at existing properties and provide excess cash for future development and acquisitions.

Table of Contents

We continue to expand our gaming operations through the implementation and execution of a disciplined capital expenditure program at our existing properties, the pursuit of strategic acquisitions and the development of new gaming properties, particularly in attractive regional markets. Additional information regarding our capital projects is discussed in detail in the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures” below.

Segment Information

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, who is the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, as that term is defined in ASC 280, measures and assesses the Company’s business performance based on regional operations of various properties grouped together based primarily on their geographic locations. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company changed its three reportable segments from East/Midwest, West and Southern Plains to Northeast, South/West, and Midwest in connection with the addition of a new regional vice president and a realignment of responsibilities within our segments. Segment information for prior periods has been restated for comparability.

The South/West reportable segment consists of the following properties: Zia Park Casino, Hollywood Casino Tunica, Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast, Boomtown Biloxi, M Resort, and Tropicana Las Vegas, which was acquired on August 25, 2015, as well as the Hollywood Casino Jamul—San Diego project with the Jamul Tribe, which opened on October 10, 2016.

The Midwest reportable segment consists of the following properties: Hollywood Casino Aurora, Hollywood Casino Joliet, Argosy Casino Alton, Argosy Casino Riverside, Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg, Hollywood Casino St. Louis, and Prairie State Gaming, which the Company acquired on September 1, 2015, and includes the Company’s 50% investment in Kansas Entertainment, which owns the Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway.

The Other category consists of the Company’s standalone racing operations, namely Rosecroft Raceway, which was sold on July 31, 2016, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, and the Company’s joint venture interests in Sam Houston Race Park, Valley Race Park, and Freehold Raceway. If the Company is successful in obtaining gaming operations at these locations, they would be assigned to one of the Company’s regional executives and reported in their respective reportable segment. The Other category also includes the Company’s corporate overhead operations, which does not meet the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280 and Penn Interactive Ventures, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary which represents its social online gaming initiatives, including the recently acquired Rocket Games, and would meet the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280, but is quantatively not significant to the Company’s operations as it represents 0.5% of net revenues and 0.4% of income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

In addition to GAAP financial measures, management uses adjusted EBITDA as an important measure of the operating performance of its segments, including the evaluation of operating personnel and believes it is especially relevant in evaluating large, long lived casino projects because they provide a perspective on the current effects of operating decisions separated from the substantial non-operational depreciation charges and financing costs of such projects. The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, stock compensation, debt extinguishment charges, impairment charges, insurance recoveries and deductible charges, depreciation and amortization, changes in the estimated fair value of contingent purchase price, gain or loss on disposal of assets, and other income or expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is also inclusive of income or loss from unconsolidated affiliates, with the Company’s share of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization) added back for its joint venture in Kansas Entertainment. Adjusted EBITDA excludes payments associated with our Master Lease agreement with GLPI as the transaction is accounted for as a financing obligation. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to

Table of Contents

income from operations, as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of liquidity, or as any other measure of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company has significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, taxes and debt principal repayments, which are not reflected in adjusted EBITDA.

Executive Summary

As reported by most jurisdictions, regional gaming industry trends began softening midway through the second quarter, particularly in our unrated player category. The expansion of recently constructed gaming facilities continues to impact the overall domestic gaming industry as well as our operating results in certain markets.

We operate a geographically diversified portfolio comprised largely of new and well maintained regional gaming facilities. This has allowed us to develop what we believe to be a solid base for future growth opportunities. We have also made investments in joint ventures that we believe may allow us to capitalize on additional gaming opportunities in certain states if legislation or referenda are passed that permit and/or expand gaming in these jurisdictions and we are selected as a licensee. Historically, the Company has been reliant on certain key regional gaming markets (for example, its results from Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg). Over the past several years, the Company has diversified its operations via new development facilities and acquisitions.

Financial Highlights:

We reported net revenues and income from operations of $765.6 million and $139.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $739.3 million and $142.2 million, respectively, for the corresponding period in the prior year and net revenues and income from operations of $2,291.5 million and $429.2 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $2,104.4 million and $377.2 million, respectively for the corresponding period in the prior year. The major factors affecting our results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, were:

The opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015 in our Northeast segment, which generated $43.8 million and $129.7 million of net revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

The acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015 in our South/West segment, which generated $28.7 million and $89.1 million of net revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

The acquisition of Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015 in our Midwest segment, which generated $14.5 million and $44.0 million of net revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Net income increased by $41.6 million and $94.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to contributions from the new or recently acquired properties described above, as well as lower income tax provision and higher interest income, partially offset by higher depreciation expense and higher interest expense incurred under our credit facility.

Segment Developments:

The following are recent developments that have had or will have an impact on us by segment:

Northeast

Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races faced increased competition from the Baltimore, Maryland market, which includes Maryland Live! and Horseshoe Casino Baltimore, which opened at the end of August 2014. In addition, in December 2013, the license for Prince George’s County, Maryland was granted to MGM. The proposed $1.3 billion National Harbor casino, which MGM plans to open in December 2016, is anticipated to adversely impact our financial results as it will create additional competition for Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races.

Table of Contents

On February 28, 2014, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission awarded the Company a Category Two slots-only gaming license for its planned Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts. On June 24, 2015, the Company opened the facility, which features live harness racing and simulcasting, along with 1,250 gaming devices, various dining and entertainment options, structured and surface parking, and a two story clubhouse with approximately 55,000 square feet.

Construction of a tribal casino in Taunton, Massachusetts that was expected to open in 2017, is currently on hold following a recent judicial opinion. MGM Springfield in Western Massachusetts is expected to be completed in late 2018 and Wynn Everett in Eastern Massachusetts is scheduled to open in mid-2019. The increased competition in Massachusetts will have a negative impact on the operations of Plainridge Park Casino.

South/West

On April 5, 2013, we announced that, subject to final National Indian Gaming Commission approval, we and the Jamul Tribe had entered into definitive agreements (including management, development, branding and lending arrangements) to jointly develop a Hollywood Casino branded gaming facility on the Jamul Tribe’s trust land in San Diego County, California. The current budget of $407 million for this facility located approximately 20 miles east of downtown San Diego was increased by $17 million since the second quarter of 2016 due to a $10 million cost increase in offsite improvements and $7 million of additional preopening costs due to the delay in opening from August to October. The facility is a state of the art development project which includes a three-story gaming and entertainment facility of approximately 200,000 square feet featuring 1,731 slot machines, 40 live table games, multiple restaurants, bars and lounges and a partially enclosed parking structure with over 1,800 spaces. In mid-January 2014, we commenced construction activities at the site and in June 2015, we announced the “Topping Out” marking the halfway point of construction. Hollywood Casino Jamul – San Diego opened on October 10, 2016. We currently provide financing to the Jamul Tribe in connection with the project and, following the opening, we manage and provide branding for the casino in exchange for a management fee equal to 30% of the casino’s pretax income, a licensing fee of 2% of gross revenues for the Hollywood Casino brand, as well as interest on loans provided by the Company in connection with the project.

On April 29, 2015, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Tropicana Las Vegas for $360 million. The acquisition was completed on August 25, 2015. Tropicana Las Vegas is situated on 35 acres of land located on the Las Vegas Strip with 1,467 remodeled guest rooms and suites, a 50,000 square foot casino gaming floor featuring 844 slot and video poker machines and 38 table games including blackjack, mini-baccarat, craps and roulette, three full-service restaurants, a 1,200 seat performance theater, a 300 seat comedy club, a nightclub, beach club and 2,950 parking spaces. During the second quarter of 2016, we refreshed the gaming floor with new slot machines and launched our Marquee Rewards player loyalty program at the Tropicana Las Vegas. Additionally, we continue to execute our master plan for the property which we expect will include additional food, beverage, retail and entertainment and other non-gaming amenities and enhancements by late next year.

Midwest

Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg faced increased competition, namely the openings of a racino at Belterra Park in May 2014 and our own Dayton facility in late August 2014.

On September 1, 2015, we acquired Prairie State Gaming (“PSG”), a leading Illinois video gaming terminal operator. As one of the largest and most respected video gaming terminal route operators in Illinois, PSG’s operations include more than 1,100 video gaming terminals across a network of 270 bar and retail gaming establishments throughout Illinois.

Other

On August 1, 2016, we completed our acquisition of Rocket Games, a leading developer of social casino games.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates

We make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions when applying accounting principles in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The nature of the estimates and assumptions are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain factors or the susceptibility of such factors to change. We have identified the accounting for long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes and litigation, and claims and assessments as critical accounting estimates, as they are the most important to our financial statement presentation and require difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and, in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition.

For further information on our critical accounting estimates, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There has been no material change to these estimates for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Results of Operations

The following are the most important factors and trends that contribute to our operating performance:

Most of our properties operate in mature competitive markets. As a result, we expect a majority of our future growth to come from prudent acquisitions of gaming properties (such as our August 2015 acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas), jurisdictional expansions (such as our June 2015 opening of a slots-only gaming facility in Massachusetts, our October 2016 opening of a Hollywood Casino branded gaming facility on the Jamul Indian Village land in trust which we will manage, the September 2014 opening of Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course and the August 2014 opening of Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway), expansions of gaming in existing jurisdictions (such as the introduction of table games in July 2010 at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, and at Hollywood Casino Bangor in March 2012), expansions/improvements of existing properties (such as a hotel at Zia Park Casino which opened in August 2014) and new growth opportunities (such as our acquisition of Prairie State Gaming, a leading video lottery terminal operator in Illinois, and our entry into the interactive and social gaming business through Penn Interactive Ventures, including our recent acquisition of Rocket Games).

A number of states are currently considering or implementing legislation to legalize or expand gaming. Such legislation presents both potential opportunities to establish new properties (for example, in Massachusetts, where we opened a slots-only gaming facility on June 24, 2015, in Kansas, where we opened a casino through a joint venture in February 2012, and in Ohio, where we opened casinos in Toledo and Columbus in May 2012 and October 2012, respectively, and opened video lottery terminal facilities at two racetracks in Ohio in the third quarter of 2014) and increased competitive threats to business at our existing properties (such as the introduction/expansion of commercial casinos in Kansas, Maryland, Ohio, and potentially Kentucky and Nebraska, and the introduction of tavern licenses in several states, most significantly in Illinois).

The actions of government bodies can affect our operations in a variety of ways. For instance, the continued pressure on governments to balance their budgets could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes and/or property taxes, or via an expansion of gaming. In addition, government bodies may restrict, prevent or negatively impact operations in the jurisdictions in which we do business (such as the implementation of smoking bans).

Table of Contents

The continued demand for, and our emphasis on, slot wagering entertainment at our properties.

The successful execution of our development and construction activities, as well as the risks associated with the costs, regulatory approval and the timing of these activities.

The risks related to economic conditions and the effect of such prolonged sluggish conditions on consumer spending for leisure and gaming activities, which may negatively impact our operating results and our ability to continue to access financing at favorable terms.

The consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are summarized below:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)
Revenues:
Gaming	$	654,591	$	651,284	$	1,974,618	$	1,861,539
Food, beverage, hotel and other		147,554		124,721		429,792		350,905
Management service and licensing fees		3,130		2,871		8,567		7,614
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		8,820		—
Revenues		811,240		778,876		2,421,797		2,220,058
Less promotional allowances		(45,643)		(39,579)		(130,327)		(115,667)
Net revenues		765,597		739,297		2,291,470		2,104,391

Operating expenses:
Gaming		336,669		334,219		1,011,187		942,730
Food, beverage, hotel and other		102,110		89,151		302,062		249,883
General and administrative		114,376		107,614		340,854		342,771
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		8,820		—
Depreciation and amortization		67,903		66,141		200,105		191,785
Insurance recoveries		(726)		—		(726)		—
Total operating expenses		626,297		597,125		1,862,302		1,727,169
Income from operations	$	139,300	$	142,172	$	429,168	$	377,222

Certain information regarding our results of operations by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is summarized below:


	Net Revenues				Income (loss) from Operations
Three Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)

Northeast	$	395,748	$	406,552	$	101,752	$	107,148
South/West		135,169		118,266		19,337		22,307
Midwest		221,172		209,115		56,343		52,521
Other		13,508		5,364		(38,132)		(39,804)
Total	$	765,597	$	739,297	$	139,300	$	142,172

Table of Contents


		Net Revenues			Income (loss) from Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)

Northeast	$	1,190,469	$	1,120,272	$	306,368	$	274,995
South/West		411,245		345,516		72,944		81,910
Midwest		662,506		622,652		172,013		160,631
Other		27,250		15,951		(122,157)		(140,314)
Total	$	2,291,470	$	2,104,391	$	429,168	$	377,222

Revenues

Revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):


							Percentage
Three Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Gaming	$	654,591	$	651,284	$	3,307	0.5	%
Food, beverage, hotel and other		147,554		124,721		22,833	18.3	%
Management service and licensing fees		3,130		2,871		259	9.0	%
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		5,965	N/A
Revenues		811,240		778,876		32,364	4.2	%
Less promotional allowances		(45,643)		(39,579)		(6,064)	15.3	%
Net revenues	$	765,597	$	739,297	$	26,300	3.6	%


							Percentage
Nine Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Gaming	$	1,974,618	$	1,861,539	$	113,079	6.1	%
Food, beverage, hotel and other		429,792		350,905		78,887	22.5	%
Management service and licensing fees		8,567		7,614		953	12.5	%
Reimbursable management costs		8,820		—		8,820	N/A
Revenues		2,421,797		2,220,058		201,739	9.1	%
Less promotional allowances		(130,327)		(115,667)		(14,660)	12.7	%
Net revenues	$	2,291,470	$	2,104,391	$	187,079	8.9	%

In our business, revenue is driven by discretionary consumer spending. The expansion of newly constructed gaming facilities has increased competition in many regional markets (including at some of our key facilities). As reported by most jurisdictions, regional gaming industry trends began softening midway through the second quarter, primarily in our unrated player category.

We have no certain mechanism for determining why consumers choose to spend more or less money at our properties from period to period and as such cannot quantify a dollar amount for each factor that impacts our customers’ spending behaviors.

However, based on our experience, we can generally offer some insight into the factors that we believe were likely to account for such changes. In instances where we believe one factor may have had a significantly greater impact than the other factors, we have noted that as well. However, in all instances, such insights are based only on our reasonable judgment and professional experience, and no assurance can be given as to the accuracy of our judgments.

The retail value of accommodations, food and beverage, and other services furnished to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as “promotional allowances.” Our promotional allowance levels are

Table of Contents

determined based on various factors such as our marketing plans, competitive factors, economic conditions, and regulations.

Gaming revenue

Gaming revenue increased by $3.3 million, or 0.5%, and $113.1 million, or 6.1%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the variances explained below.

Gaming revenue for our Northeast segment decreased by $9.0 million, or 2.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to decreased gaming revenue at Plainridge Park Casino and Hollywood Casino Toledo which was negatively impacted by road construction that impeded access to the facility, which together decreased gaming revenue $9.0 million, and to a lesser extent decreased gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in the region, namely Maryland Live! and Horseshoe Casino Baltimore, offset by increased gaming revenue at our other three Ohio properties.

Gaming revenue for our Northeast segment increased by $66.9 million, or 6.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015 and improved results at all of our Ohio properties, which together increased gaming revenue $78.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, all of which were partially offset by decreased gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and to a lesser extent at Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in the region, namely Maryland Live! and Horseshoe Casino Baltimore.

Gaming revenue for our Midwest segment increased by $11.0 million, or 5.7%, and $36.9 million, or 6.4%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015, which generated $10.2 million and $39.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and improved results at Argosy Riverside and Hollywood Casino St. Louis, all of which were partially offset by decreased gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino Joliet, Argosy Alton, which was negatively impacted by flooding that occurred during the first quarter 2016, and Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in Ohio, namely the openings of a racino at Belterra Park, Horseshoe Casino in Cincinnati and our own facility in Dayton.

Gaming revenue for our South/West segment increased by $1.3 million, or 1.4%, and $9.3 million, or 3.4%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015, partially offset by decreased gaming revenue at Hollywood Casino Tunica, Zia Park Casino, as ongoing softness in oil prices have continued to affect the economy in this area, and new competition impacting Boomtown Biloxi.

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue increased by $22.8 million, or 18.3%, and $78.9 million, or 22.5%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the variances explained below.

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue for our Northeast segment increased by $6.8 million, or 5.2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015.

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue for our Midwest segment increased by $2.2 million, or 7.1%, and $3.9 million, or 4.1%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015 and improved

Table of Contents

results at Hollywood Casino St. Louis and Argosy Riverside and higher revenues at Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg, as a result of the new hotel and event center which opened on January 13, 2015.

Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue for our South/West segment increased by $13.4 million, or 32.6%, and $57.0 million, or 52.6%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015.

Promotional allowances

Promotional allowances increased by $6.1 million, or 15.3%, and $14.7 million, or 12.7%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015 and the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 24, 2015.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):


							Percentage
Three Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Gaming	$	336,669	$	334,219	$	2,450	0.7	%
Food, beverage, hotel and other		102,110		89,151		12,959	14.5	%
General and administrative		114,376		107,614		6,762	6.3	%
Reimbursable management costs		5,965		—		5,965	N/A
Depreciation and amortization		67,903		66,141		1,762	2.7	%
Insurance recoveries		(726)		—		(726)	N/A
Total operating expenses	$	626,297	$	597,125	$	29,172	4.9	%


							Percentage
Nine Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Gaming	$	1,011,187	$	942,730	$	68,457	7.3	%
Food, beverage, hotel and other		302,062		249,883		52,179	20.9	%
General and administrative		340,854		342,771		(1,917)	(0.6)	%
Reimbursable management costs		8,820		—		8,820	N/A
Depreciation and amortization		200,105		191,785		8,320	4.3	%
Insurance recoveries		(726)		—		(726)	N/A
Total operating expenses	$	1,862,302	$	1,727,169	$	135,133	7.8	%

Gaming expense

Gaming expense increased by $2.5 million, or 0.7%, and $68.5 million, or 7.3%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the variances explained below.

Gaming expense for our Northeast segment decreased by $8.1 million, or 3.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to decreased gaming taxes resulting from decreased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at Plainridge Park Casino and Hollywood Casino Toledo and to a lesser extent at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in the region, namely Maryland Live! and Horseshoe Casino Baltimore, partially offset by increased gaming taxes resulting from increased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at our other three Ohio properties.

Table of Contents

Gaming expense for our Northeast segment increased by $34.2 million, or 6.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015 and increased gaming taxes resulting from increased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at our other three Ohio properties, which was partially offset by a decrease in gaming taxes resulting from decreased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at Hollywood Casino Toledo, Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and to a lesser extent Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course.

Gaming expense for our Midwest segment increased by $9.5 million, or 10.4%, and $29.0 million, or 10.8%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015 and an increase in gaming taxes resulting from increased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at Argosy Riverside and Hollywood Casino St. Louis, which was partially offset by decreased gaming taxes resulting from decreased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at Hollywood Casino Joliet, and for the nine months ended at Hollywood Casino Aurora and Argosy Alton.

Gaming expense for our South/West segment increased by $0.8 million, or 2.5%, and $5.3 million, or 5.1%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015, partially offset by decreased gaming taxes resulting from decreased taxable gaming revenue mentioned above at Zia Park Casino.

Food, beverage, hotel and other expenses

Food, beverage, hotel and other expenses increased by $13.0 million, or 14.5%, and $52.2 million, or 20.9%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the variances explained below.

Food, beverage, hotel and other expenses for our Northeast segment increased by $4.7 million, or 4.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015.

Food, beverage, hotel and other expenses for our Midwest segment increased by $0.7 million, or 3.1%, and $3.0 million, or 4.7%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to improved results at Hollywood Casino St. Louis, Hollywood Casino Joliet and Argosy Riverside.

Food, beverage, hotel and other expenses for our South/West segment increased by $8.7 million, or 27.8%, and $39.7 million, or 49.4%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses include items such as compliance, facility maintenance, utilities, property and liability insurance, surveillance and security, and certain housekeeping services, as well as all expenses for administrative departments such as accounting, purchasing, human resources, legal and internal audit. General and administrative expenses also include lobbying expenses.

General and administrative expenses increased by $6.8 million, or 6.3%, and decreased by $1.9 million, or 0.6%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the variances explained below.

General and administrative expenses for Other decreased by $12.4 million, or 17.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to decreased corporate overhead costs of $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, primarily due to decreased cash-settled stock-based compensation charges mainly due to the changes in stock price for Penn and GLPI common

Table of Contents

stock during 2016 compared to 2015 and due to lower bonus and severance accruals in 2016, primarily due to the termination of some senior level corporate employees in 2015.

General and administrative expenses for our South/West segment increased by $2.2 million, or 9.3%, and $11.3 million, or 17.9%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015, partially offset by decreased expenses at M Resort primarily due to decreases in outside service costs.

General and administrative expenses for our Northeast segment increased by $4.4 million, or 13.1%, and $0.8 million, or 0.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to a $6.9 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the contingent purchase price from lower future earning projections, partially offset by lower property taxes at Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and decreased expenses at the majority of our other properties.

Depreciation and amortization expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.8 million, or 2.7%, and $8.3 million, or 4.3%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015, the acquisitions of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015 and Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015, and the formation of Penn Interactive Ventures, all of which were partially offset by decreased depreciation expense at the majority of our other properties as assets are becoming fully depreciated.

Other income (expenses)

Other income (expenses) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):


							Percentage
Three Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Interest expense	$	(114,349)	$	(111,406)	$	(2,943)	2.6	%
Interest income		8,202		3,083		5,119	166.0	%
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		3,505		3,759		(254)	(6.8)	%
Other		404		2,672		(2,268)	(84.9)	%
Total other expenses	$	(102,238)	$	(101,892)	$	(346)	0.3	%


							Percentage
Nine Months Ended September 30,	2016		2015		Variance		Variance
Interest expense	$	(345,548)	$	(329,550)	$	(15,998)	4.9	%
Interest income		20,039		7,396		12,643	170.9	%
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		11,662		11,895		(233)	(2.0)	%
Other		(1,978)		4,805		(6,783)	(141.2)	%
Total other expenses	$	(315,825)	$	(305,454)	$	(10,371)	3.4	%

Interest expense

Interest expense increased by $2.9 million, or 2.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, from higher borrowing levels and interest rates on the Term Loan A and revolver portions of the senior secured credit facility.

Interest expense increased by $16.0 million, or 4.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to higher borrowing levels and interest rates on the Term Loan A and revolver portions of the senior secured credit facility which contributed to an $11.4 million

Table of Contents

increase, higher contingent payments associated with the monthly variable components for Hollywood Casino Columbus and Hollywood Casino Toledo and higher payments of $2.1 million from the escalator on the financing obligation to GLPI which was triggered at the conclusion of the second year of the Master Lease and $1.7 million from a decrease in capitalized interest. The Company anticipates that the annual escalator at the end of the third year of the Master Lease (October 31, 2016) will be approximately $4.8 million, of which $0.8 million will be incurred in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Interest income

Interest income has increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to higher interest accrued on advances to the Jamul Tribe (see Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details).

Other

Other decreased by $2.3 million, or 84.9% and $6.8 million, or 141.2%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to foreign currency translation losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to foreign currency translation gains for the corresponding periods in the prior year.

Taxes

As of September 30, 2016, we intend to continue maintaining a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets until there is sufficient positive evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. A reduction in the valuation allowance would result in a significant decrease to income tax expense in the period the release is recorded. However, the exact timing and amount of the reduction in our valuation allowance are unknown at this time and will be subject to the earnings level we achieve in 2016 as well as our projected income levels in future periods. In the third quarter of 2016, we had an income tax benefit of $12.0 million due to the recording of net deferred tax liabilities associated with our acquisition of Rocket Games which reduced our valuation allowance need as well as a tax benefit of $9.8 million associated with a tax settlement of uncertain tax positions described below.

The Company’s annual ETR can vary each interim period depending on, among other factors, recurring items, such as lobbying, geographic and business mix of our earnings, as well as changes in forecasted earnings, the level of our tax credits and the realizability of our deferred tax assets. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. As such, the settlement of our ongoing U.S. and Canadian Competent Authority case during the three months ended September 30, 2016 had a significant impact on the difference between our statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and our effective rate for the quarter of (25.56%). We recorded a benefit of ($9.8) million related to this settlement for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Additionally, as a result of the settlement, the Company anticipates receiving a net cash refund of $31.0 million (USD) within the next twelve months.

Adjusted EBITDA

In addition to GAAP financial measures, adjusted EBITDA is used by management as an important measure of the Company’s operating performance. We define adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, stock compensation, debt extinguishment charges, impairment charges, insurance recoveries and deductible charges, depreciation and amortization, changes in the estimated fair value of contingent purchase price, gain or loss on disposal

Table of Contents

of assets, and other income or expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is also inclusive of income or loss from unconsolidated affiliates, with our share of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization) added back for our joint venture in Kansas Entertainment. Adjusted EBITDA excludes payments associated with our Master Lease agreement with GLPI as the transaction is accounted for as a financing obligation. Adjusted EBITDA has economic substance because it is used by management as a performance measure to analyze the performance of our business, and is especially relevant in evaluating large, long-lived casino projects because it provides a perspective on the current effects of operating decisions separated from the substantial non-operational depreciation charges and financing costs of such projects. We also present adjusted EBITDA because it is used by some investors and creditors as an indicator of the strength and performance of ongoing business operations, including our ability to service debt, fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and operations. These calculations are commonly used as a basis for investors, analysts and credit rating agencies to evaluate and compare operating performance and value companies within our industry. In addition, gaming companies have historically reported adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to financial measures in accordance with GAAP. In order to view the operations of their casinos on a more stand-alone basis, gaming companies, including us, have historically excluded from their adjusted EBITDA calculations certain corporate expenses that do not relate to the management of specific casino properties. However, adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of performance or liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA information is presented as a supplemental disclosure, as management believes that it is a widely used measure of performance in the gaming industry, is used in the valuation of gaming companies, and that it is considered by many to be a key indicator of the Company’s operating results. Management uses adjusted EBITDA as an important measure of the operating performance of its segments, including the evaluation of operating personnel. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to income from operations, as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of liquidity, or as any other measure of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company has significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, taxes and debt principal repayments, which are not reflected in adjusted EBITDA. It should also be noted that other gaming companies that report adjusted EBITDA information may calculate this metric in a different manner than the Company and therefore, comparability may be limited.

A reconciliation of the Company’s net income per GAAP to adjusted EBITDA, as well as the Company’s income from operations per GAAP to adjusted EBITDA, is included below. Additionally, a reconciliation of each segment’s income from operations to adjusted EBITDA is also included below. On a segment level, income (loss) from operations per GAAP, rather than net income (loss) per GAAP, is reconciled to adjusted EBITDA due to, among other things, the impracticability of allocating interest expense, interest income, income taxes and certain other items to the Company’s segments on a segment by segment basis. Management believes that this presentation is meaningful to investors in evaluating the performance of the Company’s segments and is consistent with the reporting of other gaming companies.

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s most directly comparable GAAP financial measures to adjusted EBITDA, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	46,535	$	4,900	$	104,278	$	9,752
Income tax provision		(9,473)		35,380		9,065		62,016
Other		(404)		(2,672)		1,978		(4,805)
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		(3,505)		(3,759)		(11,662)		(11,895)
Interest income		(8,202)		(3,083)		(20,039)		(7,396)
Interest expense		114,349		111,406		345,548		329,550
Income from operations	$	139,300	$	142,172	$	429,168	$	377,222
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets		(2,781)		276		(3,440)		801
Charge for stock compensation		1,517		2,025		4,554		6,446
Contingent purchase price		(30)		(6,651)		(1,111)		(5,944)
Depreciation and amortization		67,903		66,141		200,105		191,785
Insurance recoveries		(726)		—		(726)		—
Income from unconsolidated affiliates		3,505		3,759		11,662		11,895
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		2,572		2,540		7,713		7,818
Adjusted EBITDA	$	211,260	$	210,262	$	647,925	$	590,023

The reconciliation of each segment’s income (loss) from operations to adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):



Three months ended September 30, 2016	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	101,752	$	19,337	$	56,343	$	(38,132)	$	139,300
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		1,517		1,517
Depreciation and amortization		22,975		9,097		9,593		26,238		67,903
Contingent purchase price		(293)		—		—		263		(30)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		(13)		72		64		(2,904)		(2,781)
Insurance recoveries		—		—		(726)		—		(726)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		3,798		(293)		3,505
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		2,572		—		2,572
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124,421	$	28,506	$	71,644	$	(13,311)	$	211,260



Three months ended September 30, 2015	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	107,148	$	22,307	$	52,521	$	(39,804)	$	142,172
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		2,025		2,025
Depreciation and amortization		24,350		6,971		9,984		24,836		66,141
Contingent purchase price		(6,651)		—		—		—		(6,651)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		33		185		34		24		276
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		3,831		(72)		3,759
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		2,540		—		2,540
Adjusted EBITDA	$	124,880	$	29,463	$	68,910	$	(12,991)	$	210,262

Table of Contents



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
(Loss) income from operations	$	306,368	$	72,944	$	172,013	$	(122,157)	$	429,168
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		4,554		4,554
Depreciation and amortization		69,177		26,701		28,621		75,606		200,105
Contingent purchase price		(1,374)		—		—		263		(1,111)
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets		(6)		58		18		(3,510)		(3,440)
Insurance recoveries		—		—		(726)		—		(726)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		12,261		(599)		11,662
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		7,713		—		7,713
Adjusted EBITDA	$	374,165	$	99,703	$	219,900	$	(45,843)	$	647,925



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015	Northeast		South/West		Midwest		Other (1)		Total
Income (loss) from operations	$	274,995	$	81,910	$	160,631	$	(140,314)	$	377,222
Charge for stock compensation		—		—		—		6,446		6,446
Depreciation and amortization		70,016		17,091		29,846		74,832		191,785
Contingent purchase price		(5,944)		—		—		—		(5,944)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		40		585		28		148		801
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates		—		—		12,021		(126)		11,895
Non-operating items for Kansas JV		—		—		7,818		—		7,818
Adjusted EBITDA	$	339,107	$	99,586	$	210,344	$	(59,014)	$	590,023

(1)

Adjusted EBITDA excludes our share of the impact of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization expense) from our joint venture in Kansas Entertainment.

Adjusted EBITDA for our Northeast segment increased by $35.1 million, or 10.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to improved results at all of our Ohio properties, which together increased adjusted EBITDA by $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, partially offset by decreased adjusted EBITDA at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in the region, namely Maryland Live! and Horseshoe Casino Baltimore.

Adjusted EBITDA for our South/West segment decreased by $1.0 million, or 3.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to decreased adjusted EBITDA at Zia Park Casino, as low oil prices have continued to affect the economy in this area, partially offset by the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015 and improved results at M Resort.

Adjusted EBITDA for our South/West segment increased by $0.1 million, or 0.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015 and improved results at M Resort, partially offset by decreased adjusted EBITDA at Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast and Boomtown Biloxi, due to new competition and Zia Park Casino. South/West segment results for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 include a $3.5 million litigation settlement gain at the Tropicana Las Vegas which is partially offset by severance charges and gaming floor disruption.

Adjusted EBITDA for our Midwest segment increased by $2.7 million, or 4.0%, and $9.6 million, or 4.5%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the acquisition of Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015 and improved results at Hollywood Casino St. Louis and Hollywood Casino Aurora, which was partially offset by decreased adjusted EBITDA at Argosy Alton resulting from flooding during the first quarter 2016, which has resulted in declines in business volumes and difficulty recovering lost business, decreased adjusted EBITDA at Hollywood Lawrenceburg, primarily due to the continued impact of competition in Ohio, namely the openings of a racino at Belterra Park, Horseshoe Casino in Cincinnati and our own facility in Dayton.

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA for Other declined by $0.3 million, or 2.5%, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to increased corporate overhead costs of $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to increased cash-settled stock-based compensation charges mainly due to changes in stock price for Penn and GLPI common stock during the third quarter 2016 compared to the third quarter 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA for Other improved $13.2 million, or 22.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to decreased corporate overhead costs of $9.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to decreased cash-settled stock-based compensation charges mainly due to changes in stock price for Penn and GLPI common stock during 2016 compared to 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically and prospectively, our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been and will be cash flow from operations, borrowings from banks and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities. We also have been actively assisting the Jamul Tribe to refinance their indebtedness over the last several quarters. In October 2016, the Jamul Tribe refinanced their indebtedness and the Company received approximately $274 million of the proceeds from the Credit Facilities to repay previous loans to fund the construction and development of the Casino and to retire certain debt of the Jamul Tribe. The Company used a substantial amount of the funds received from such repayment to repay borrowings under its corporate revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $311.5 million and $306.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $5.4 million for nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, was comprised primarily of an increase in cash receipts from customers of $188.4 million and a decrease in cash paid for taxes of $12.6 million due to refunds received in first quarter 2016, partially offset by an increase in cash paid to suppliers and vendors of $119.6 million, an increase in cash paid to employees of $60.5 million and an increase in cash paid for interest of $17.9 million. The increases in cash paid to suppliers and vendors, cash receipts from customers and cash paid to employees is primarily due to the opening of Plainridge Park Casino on June 24, 2015 and the acquisitions of Tropicana Las Vegas on August 25, 2015 and Prairie State Gaming on September 1, 2015. The increase in cash paid for interest is primarily due to higher borrowing levels and interest rates on the Term Loan A and revolver portions of the senior secured credit facility and contingent payments on the financing obligation to GLPI and a decrease in capitalized interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $277.3 million and $683.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities of $406.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, was primarily due to decreased capital project expenditures of $110.7 million due to the development of Plainridge Park Casino during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, decreased expenditures from the acquisition of other property and equipment of $393.4 million due to the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas and Prairie State Gaming during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, partially offset by expenditures for the acquisition of Rocket Games during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and increased proceeds related to the sale of assets held for sale of $12.8 million, all of which are partially offset by increased advances to the Jamul Tribe of $103.6 million and increased capital maintenance expenditures of $9.6 million.

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities totaled $(69.5) million and $392.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities of $462.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, was primarily due to lower proceeds from our long-term debt of $443.1 million, increased payments on other long term obligations of $10.1 million, increased principal payments of $9.3 million on long-term debt, increased payments on our financing obligation with GLPI of $2.5 million and lower proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $2.4 million, all of which are partially offset by higher proceeds from insurance financing of $8.7 million.

Table of Contents

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures are accounted for as either capital project or capital maintenance (replacement) expenditures. Capital project expenditures are for fixed asset additions that expand an existing facility or create a new facility. Capital maintenance expenditures are expenditures to replace existing fixed assets with a useful life greater than one year that are obsolete, worn out or no longer cost effective to repair.

The following table summarizes our expected capital project expenditures by segment for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, and actual expenditures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 (excluding licensing fees and net of reimbursements). The table below should not be utilized to predict future expected capital project expenditures subsequent to 2016.


	Expected for Year		Expenditure for
	Ending December 31,		Nine Months Ended		Balance to Expend
Property	2016		September 30, 2016		in 2016
	(in millions)

Northeast	$	6.0	$	4.3	$	1.7
South/West		24.4		10.2		14.2
Total	$	30.4	$	14.5	$	15.9

Tropicana Las Vegas was acquired on August 25, 2015 for $360 million. During the year, we have reconfigured the gaming floor with updated slot machines, altered game placements and refined the table game mix. During the coming months, we will be making further enhancements to the facility with a focus on improving the food and beverage offerings. Additionally, in April 2016, we integrated the property into our Marquee Rewards player loyalty program which enables our regional gaming customers to redeem their loyalty reward points at the facility.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we spent $51.4 million for capital maintenance expenditures, with $17.6 million at our Northeast segment, $11.6 million at our South/West segment, $19.8 million at our Midwest segment, and $2.4 million for other. The majority of the capital maintenance expenditures were for slot machines and slot machine equipment.

Cash generated from operations and cash available under the revolving credit facility portion of our senior secured credit facility funded our capital projects, capital maintenance expenditures and the Jamul Tribe project in 2016 to date.

Jamul Tribe

Advances to the Jamul Tribe, which totaled $360.9 million at September 30, 2016, is accounted for as a loan on the consolidated balance sheet and as such is not included in the capital expenditures table presented above. The current budget of $407 million for this facility was increased by $17 million since the second quarter of 2016 due to a $10 million cost increase in offsite improvements and $7 million of additional preopening costs due to the delay in opening from August to October. The facility opened on October 10, 2016. The Company has been actively assisting the Jamul Tribe to refinance their indebtedness over the last several quarters. In October 2016, the Jamul Tribe refinanced their indebtedness and the Company received approximately $274 million of the proceeds from the Credit Facilities to repay previous loans to fund the construction and development of the Casino and to retire certain debt of the Jamul Tribe. The Company used a substantial amount of the funds received from such repayment to repay borrowings under its corporate revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Table of Contents

Senior Secured Credit Facility

Corporate Airplane Loan

Financing Obligation with GLPI

As discussed in Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company makes significant payments to GLPI under the Master Lease. As of September 30, 2016, the Company financed with GLPI real property assets associated with eighteen of the Company’s gaming and related facilities used in the Company’s operations.

Covenants

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants.

Outlook

Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash generated from operations and cash on hand, together with amounts available under our senior secured credit facility, will be adequate to meet our financing obligation, debt service requirements, capital expenditures and working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot be certain that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that our anticipated earnings projections will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available under our senior secured credit facility or otherwise will be available to enable us to service our indebtedness, including the senior secured credit facility and the $300 million 5.875% senior unsecured notes, to retire or redeem the $300 million 5.875% senior unsecured notes when required or to make anticipated capital expenditures. In addition, we expect a majority of our future growth to come from acquisitions of gaming properties at reasonable valuations, greenfield projects, jurisdictional expansions and property expansion in under-penetrated markets. If we consummate significant acquisitions in the future or undertake any significant property expansions, our cash requirements may increase significantly and we may need to make additional borrowings or complete equity or debt financings to meet these requirements. Our future operating performance and our ability to service or refinance our debt will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Capital Structure” in the

Table of Contents

Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the risk related to our capital structure.

We have historically maintained a capital structure comprising a mix of equity and debt financing. We vary our leverage to pursue opportunities in the marketplace and in an effort to maximize our enterprise value for our shareholders. We expect to meet our debt obligations as they come due through internally generated funds from operations and/or refinancing them through the debt or equity markets prior to their maturity.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The table below provides information at September 30, 2016 about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts maturing during the period and the related weighted-average interest rates by maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged by maturity date and the weighted-average interest rates are based on implied forward LIBOR rates at September 30, 2016.


	10/01/16 -			10/01/17 -			10/01/18 -			10/01/19 -			10/01/20 -								Fair Value
	9/30/2017			9/30/2018			9/30/2019			9/30/2020			9/30/2021			Thereafter			Total		9/30/2016
	(in thousands)
Long-term debt:
Fixed rate	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	300,000		$	300,000	$	310,500
Average interest rate																	5.88	%

Variable rate	$	64,244		$	68,360		$	864,589		$	2,500		$	233,125		$	—		$	1,232,818	$	1,231,429
Average interest rate (1)		3.40	%		3.44	%		3.49	%		4.04	%		3.68	%		—	%		—

(1)

Estimated rate, reflective of forward LIBOR plus the spread over LIBOR applicable to variable-rate borrowing.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of September 30, 2016, which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As described below, management has identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result of these material weaknesses, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2016 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As disclosed in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 15, 2016, the Company did not maintain effective controls and procedures over the evaluation and accounting of certain complex and non-routine transactions including lease transactions. Specifically, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge and experience to challenge our application of GAAP commensurate with the nature and complexity of certain of our transactions to prevent or detect and correct material misstatements in a timely manner. In addition, we did not maintain effective controls and procedures over the calculation of impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Specifically, our review controls were not designed with a sufficient level of precision and executed by personnel with an appropriate level of

Table of Contents

experience to detect material errors in the methodologies used and in the calculation of the impairment charges that were recognized in our consolidated statements.

The Company has initiated a compensating control over the proper application of GAAP to complex and non-routine transactions, which includes the involvement of a third party consultant with relevant knowledge and experience to assist the Company with the evaluation of the accounting for highly technical accounting matters. The Company currently expects to have this material weakness remediated no later than December 31, 2016, once we have obtained sufficient evidence that the newly designed and implemented controls are operating effectively.

With respect to the material weakness over the accounting for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment measurement, the Company designed and implemented additional controls during 2015. This included the involvement of a third party consultant to provide the Company with the appropriate level of expertise to assist in the review of the assessment at a sufficient level of precision. The Company currently expects to have this material weakness remediated no later than December 31, 2016, once we have obtained sufficient evidence that the newly designed and implemented controls are operating effectively.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, with the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas and its associated entities (“Tropicana Las Vegas”) on August 24, 2015, the Company had assumed litigation arising from the Bankruptcy Chapter 11 reorganization (“Bankruptcy”) of Tropicana Las Vegas’ former affiliate, Tropicana Entertainment Holdings, LLC (“TEH”). In this Bankruptcy proceeding, there was an unresolved dispute whereby TEH claims that Tropicana Las Vegas is responsible for the payment of certain professional fees and expenses incurred from the Bankruptcy. On May 23, 2016, an agreement was reached to settle the dispute in the amount of $3.1 million. The settlement agreement was approved by the bankruptcy court on June 23, 2016. We are not aware of any new legal proceedings, which are required to be disclosed.

ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS

We are not aware of any material changes to the risk factors described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3 — DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4 — MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5 — OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit		Description of Exhibit

10.1		Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2016, by and among the Jamul Indian Village Development Corporation, as borrower, the Jamul Indiana Village of California, the Administrative Agent, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto in the capacity of lenders and the other agents and arrangers party thereto (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.2#		Executive Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2016, by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and William J. Fair (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.3#		Transition Services Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2016, by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Saul V. Reibstein (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.4*		Third Amendment to the Master Lease.

31.1*		CEO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2*		CFO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

32.1*		CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and (vi) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

# Compensation plans and arrangements for executives and others.

* Filed herewith

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC.

November 4, 2016	By:	/s/ Timothy J. Wilmott
		Timothy J. Wilmott
		Chief Executive Officer and President

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description of Exhibit

10.1		Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2016, by and among the Jamul Indian Village Development Corporation, as borrower, the Jamul Indiana Village of California, the Administrative Agent, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto in the capacity of lenders and the other agents and arrangers party thereto (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.2#		Executive Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2016, by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and William J. Fair (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.3#		Transition Services Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2016, by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Saul V. Reibstein (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2016).

10.4		Third Amendment to the Master Lease.

31.1*		CEO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2*		CFO Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1*		CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and (vi) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

# Compensation plans and arrangements for executives and others.

* Filed herewith.

penn_Ex10_4

Exhibit 10.4

THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE (this “Amendment”) shall amend that certain Master Lease, dated November 1, 2013, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Master Lease dated March 5, 2014, and as further amended by that certain Second Amendment to Master Lease and First Amendment to Access Agreement dated April 18, 2014 (collectively, the “Master Lease”), by and among GLP Capital, L.P. (together with its permitted successors and assigns, “Landlord”) and Penn Tenant, LLC (together with its permitted successors and assigns, “Tenant”) and is being entered into on this 20th day of September, 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Landlord and Tenant, as more fully set forth herein. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Master Lease.

BACKGROUND:

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant each desire to amend the Master Lease as more fully described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the provisions set forth in the Master Lease as amended by this Amendment, including, but not limited to, the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained therein and herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby respectively acknowledged, and subject to the terms and conditions thereof and hereof, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that the Master Lease shall be amended as follows:

Article I

amendment of Section 1.3 of the master lease

1.1 Section 1.3 of the Master Lease is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

1.3Term. The "Term" of this Master Lease is the Initial Term plus all Renewal Terms, to the extent exercised. The initial term of this Master Lease (the "Initial Term") shall commence on November 1, 2013 (the "Commencement Date") and end on October 31, 2028, subject to renewal as set forth in Section 1.4 below.

Article II

Amendment to SEction 2.1 of the Master Lease

2.1 The parties hereby agree as follows:

(a) After giving effect to the adjustments required by the Master Lease from inception of the Master Lease through the date of this Amendment, the parties agree as follows:

(i) Building Base Rent for the Lease Year expiring on October 31, 2016 (the “Third Lease Year”) is equal to two hundred fifty-five million, seven hundred fifty-six thousand, one hundred thirty-eight Dollars ($255,756,138).

Building Base Rent shall be subject to further adjustment as provided for in the Master Lease.

(ii) Other Land Base Rent for the Third Lease Year is equal to forty-nine million, five hundred fifty-one thousand, three hundred twenty-four Dollars ($49,551,324). Other Land Base Rent shall be subject to further adjustment as provided for in the Master Lease.

(b) After giving effect to the adjustments required by the Master Lease from inception of the Master Lease through the date of this Amendment, the definition of “Percentage Rent” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

Percentage Rent: The sum of (1) for all Facilities other than the CT Facilities, an annual amount equal to forty-nine million, five hundred fifty-one thousand, three hundred twenty-four Dollars ($49,551,324); provided, however, that the Percentage Rent for all Facilities other than the CT Facilities shall be reset each Percentage Rent Reset Year to a fixed annual amount equal to the product of (i) four percent (4%) and (ii) the excess (if any) of (a) the average annual Net Revenues of all the Facilities other than the CT Facilities for the trailing five-year period (i.e., the first (1st) through fifth (5th) Lease Years, the sixth (6th) through tenth (10th) Lease Years, the eleventh (11th) though fifteenth (15th) Lease Years, the sixteenth (16th) through twentieth (20th) Lease Years, the twenty-first (21st) through twenty-fifth (25th) Lease Years and the twenty-sixth (26th) through thirtieth (30th) Lease Years) over (b) one billion, two hundred thirty-eight million, seven hundred eighty-three thousand, one hundred Dollars ($1,238,783,100), and (2) for the CT Facilities, a variable amount, determined monthly, equal to (i) 20% of the excess of actual Net Revenues of the month then ended for the CT Facilities over (ii) seventeen million, eight hundred fifty-seven thousand, two hundred forty-one Dollars ($17,857,241). For purposes of clause (a) in the preceding sentence, (x) in determining the “average annual Net Revenues” of any Development Facility added to the Leased Property hereunder during any such trailing five-year period, the “average annual Net Revenue” shall be calculated separately for each such Development Facility by using the actual Net Revenues for such Development Facility for such trailing five-year period divided by the time period during such trailing five-year period that the Development Facility was open commencing on the relevant Development Facility Commencement Date (with the average annual Net Revenues for each Development Facility then added to the average annual Net Revenues for the remaining Facilities) and (y) in the case of any Leased Property Rent Adjustment Event other than with respect to a CT Facility, the "average annual Net Revenues" shall be calculated as if such Leased Property Rent Adjustment Event occurred on the first day of such trailing five-year period. Percentage Rent shall be subject to further adjustment as and to the extent provided in Section 14.6.

For clarification purposes, a sample calculation for the required adjustment following the fifth (5th) Lease Year is attached as Annex A.

Article III

amendmeNt to section 7.3 of the master lease

3.1 Section 7.3 of the Master Lease is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Development Facilities.

The Development Facility Commencement Date associated with the Dayton Facility was August 28, 2014, and the Development Facility Commencement Date associated with the Mahoning Valley Facility was September 17, 2014.

3.2

Exhibit C of the Lease is deleted in its entirety.

Article IV

amendment to exhibit b to master lease

4.1 Exhibit B to the Master Lease is hereby amended to add the description of the Development Facilities set forth in Annex B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference to the description of the Leased Property. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the parcel located at the Mahoning Valley Facility more particularly described on Annex C attached hereto (the “Lot 2 Parcel”) shall be sold by Landlord to a third party and, upon the consummation of such sale, the Lot 2 Parcel shall be automatically removed from Exhibit B to the Master Lease without any further notice to either party or any amendment to the Master Lease.

4.2 Exhibit B to the Master Lease is hereby amended to remove the land described on Annex D attached hereto with respect to Hollywood Casino Bay St. Louis, Bay St. Louis, Mississippi.

4.3 Exhibit B to the Master Lease is hereby amended to remove the land described on Annex E attached hereto with respect to the M Resort Spa Casino, 12300 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Henderson, NV.

Article V

AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE

Landlord and Tenant shall enter into one or more amendments to any memorandum of lease which may be been recorded in accordance with Article XXXIII of the Master Lease, in form suitable for recording in each county or other application location in which a Leased Property is located which amendment is pursuant to this Amendment. Tenant shall pay all costs and expenses of recording any such amendment to memorandum and shall fully cooperate with Landlord in removing from record any such memorandum upon the expiration or earlier termination of the Term with respect to the applicable Facility.

Article VI

authority to enter into amendment

Each party represents and warrants to the other that: (i) this Amendment and all other documents executed or to be executed by it in connection herewith have been duly authorized and shall be binding upon it; (ii) it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of its formation and is duly authorized and qualified to perform this Amendment and the Master Lease, as amended hereby, within the State(s) where any portion of the Leased Property is located, and (iii) neither this Amendment, the Master Lease, as amended hereby, nor any other document executed or to be executed in connection herewith violates the terms of any other agreement of such party.

Article VII

MISCellaneous

7.1 Costs and Expenses; Fees. Each party shall be responsible for and bear all of its own expenses incurred in connection with pursuing or consummating this Amendment and the transactions contemplated by this Amendment, including, but not limited to, fees and expenses, legal counsel, accountants, and other facilitators and advisors.

7.2 Choice of Law and Forum Selection Clause. This Amendment shall be construed and interpreted, and the rights of the parties shall be determined, in accordance with the substantive Laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflict of law principles thereof or of any other jurisdiction.

7.3 Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In proving this Amendment, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Any counterpart may be executed by facsimile signature and such facsimile signature shall be deemed an original.

7.4 No Further Modification. Except as modified hereby, the Master Lease remains in full force and effect.

[Signature Page to Follow]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by each of the undersigned as of the date first above written.


	LANDLORD:

	GLP CAPITAL, L.P.

	By:	/s/ William J. Clifford
		William J. Clifford
		CFO, Secretary and Treasurer



	TENANT:

	PENN TENANT, LLC

	By:	Penn National Gaming, Inc.
		its managing member

	By:	/s/ Saul V. Reibstein
	Name:	Saul V. Reibstein
	Title:	EVP, CFO, Treasurer

ANNEX A

CALCULATION OF PERCENTAGE RENT RESET AT YEAR SIX

ANNEX B

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES NOW ADDED TO LEASED PROPERTY

Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway, Dayton, Ohio

Situated in the City of Dayton, County of Montgomery, State of Ohio, described as follows:

Situated in the City of Dayton, County of Montgomery and State of Ohio, and known as being all of Lots 84742, 84743 and 84744 of the Record Plan of Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway, recorded as Plat Book 224, Page 10 of Montgomery County Records.

Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course, Youngstown, Ohio

Tract I

Being Lot No. 1 of the Mahoning Valley Race Course Plat 1, Lot 1, Dedication/Hollywood Drive Plat, of record in Plat Book 124, Page 179, Recorder's Office, Mahoning County, Ohio.

Tract II

Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Mahoning, and being in Tract 4 of Austintown Township, and also being the remainder of a 10.67 acre tract as conveyed to Dublin Warsaw Group LLC in Official Record 4084, Page 212 Parcel 2 (all references being to records' of the Recorder's Office, Mahoning County, Ohio), and bounded and described as follows:

Commencing at an iron pin inside a monument box found at the centerline intersection of 76 Drive as dedicated in Plat Book 74, Page 128 and Canfield Niles road (S.R. 46);

Thence easterly with the centerline of 76 Drive, North 88° 35' 51" East, 2167.74 feet to an iron pin set in the easterly right-of-way line of 76 Drive, the South line of a 12.83 acre tract as conveyed to Dublin Warsaw Group LLC in Official Record 4084, PG 212, and being the true point of beginning for the parcel herein described;

Thence continuing easterly with the South line of said 12.83 acre tract, North 88° 35' 51" East, 584.77 feet to an iron pin set at the Southeast corner of said 12.83 acre tract, and being in the West line of a 108.281 acre tract as conveyed to Youngstown Real Estate in Official Record 5959, Page 68;

Thence southerly along the West line of said 108.281 acre tract, South 00° 49' 42" East, 396.35 feet to a 1" iron pipe found at the Northeast corner of Lot 2 of the Bholenath, Inc. Subdivision Plat No. 1 as recorded in Official Record 122, Page 43 and as conveyed to Janaki Inc. in Official Record 5935, Page 138;

Thence westerly along the North line of said Lot 2, South 88° 35' 51" West, 623.42 feet to an iron pin set at the Southeast corner of Lot 3 of the Replat of Lot No. 1 & 3 of Rebel Plat No. 1 Tract 4 as recorded in Plat Book 103, Pg. 75 and as conveyed to CJR Petroleum Inc. in Official Record 5716, Page 789;

Thence northerly with the East line of said Lot 3, North 01° 24' 09" West, 361.33 feet to a 1' iron pipe found at the Northeast corner of said Lot 3 and in the southerly right-of-way line of 76 Drive; Thence easterly with the southerly right-of-way line of 76 Drive, North 88° 35' 51" East, 42.62 feet to an iron pin set at the southeasterly right-of-way corner of 76 Drive;

Thence northerly with the easterly right-of-way line of 76 Drive, North 01° 24' 09" West, 35.00 feet to the true point of beginning, containing 5.656 acres, more or less.

All iron pin set are 5/8" rebar, 30" in length with a yellow plastic cap with "EP Ferris Surveyor 8230" inscribed on top.

The bearings described herein are based on the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, North Zone, NAD83 (CORS96). Said bearings originated from a field traverse which was tied to said coordinate system by GPS observations and observations of selected stations in the Ohio Department of Transportation Virtual Reference Station network. The portion of the centerline of Canfield Niles Road (S.R. 46), having a bearing of North 02° 34' 28" West and monumented between two found 1 1/4" iron pins found inside monument boxes along said centerline described herein is designated the "basis of bearing" for this survey.

This description was prepared by Matthew E. Ferris, Registered Surveyor No. 8230, E.P. Ferris & Associates, Inc. on July 24, 2012.

This description is based on a recent field survey that was conducted May 19, 2012.

ANNEX C

LOT 2 PARCEL

Commencing at an iron pin inside a monument box found at the centerline intersection of 76 Drive as dedicated in Plat Book 74, Page 128 and Canfield Niles road (S.R. 46);

Thence northerly with the easterly right-of-way line of 76 Drive, North 01° 24' 09" West, 35.00 feet to the true point of beginning, containing 5.656 acres, more or less.

All iron pin set are 5/8" rebar, 30" in length with a yellow plastic cap with "EP Ferris Surveyor 8230" inscribed on top.

This description was prepared by Matthew E. Ferris, Registered Surveyor No. 8230, E.P. Ferris & Associates, Inc. on July 24, 2012.

This description is based on a recent field survey that was conducted May 19, 2012.

ANNEX D

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY REMOVED FROM BAY ST LOUIS

Being a 1.2183 acre tract of land situated in the northwest quarter of Section 38,

Township 8 South, Range 14 West, as shown on survey by Paul D. Pitts, Jr., dated August

22, 2014, whose basis of bearing is the Mississippi State Plane Coordinate System, East

Zone (2301), NAD 83 (2011 Epoch 2010.00), Geoid 12A, grid values, using a scale factor

of 0.999981001 and a convergence angle of (neg.) -00 degrees 15 minutes 48 seconds

determined specifically for this project using GPS methods from a base station located

at N295,685.0182, E813,011.6355 obtained by an OPUS solution, and being a portion of

that land conveyed to DSL, Inc., as recorded in Deed Book BB213, page 016, Deed

Records, Hancock County, Mississippi, and being more particularly described as:

Beginning at a chiseled “x” on the seawall at the north end of Beach Boulevard and

the south right-of-way line of said Beach Boulevard (50' right-of-way) said point being

25 feet southerly from the centerline of the concrete pavement, and having Mississippi

State Plane Coordinates N305,490.5049, E819,711.6676, said point being on a curve to

the left having a central angle of 41 degrees 57 minutes 54 seconds, a radius of 775.00

feet, and a chord of 555.03 feet which bears North 54 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds

East; Thence, along said south right-of-way and said curve to the left for and arc length

of 567.63 feet, to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with and orange plastic cap stamped "Compton

Engineering", set for corner, and having Mississippi State Plane Coordinates

N305,816.1642, E820,161.114; Thence, South 56 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds East a

distance of 115 feet, to a 1/2 inch iron rod with PVC pipe set for corner, said point being

on a curve to the right having a central angle of 27 degrees 00 minutes 44 seconds, a

radius of 890.00, and a chord of 415.72 feet which bears South 46 degrees 35minutes

50 seconds West; Thence, along said curve to the right for and arc length of 419.59 feet,

to a 1/2 inch iron rod set with PVC pipe set for corner on a westerly line of the

aforementioned DSL, Inc. tract; Thence, along said westerly line, same being the east

line of land owned by the State of Mississippi, North 19 degrees 38 minutes 20 seconds

West a distance of 32.94 feet, to a PVC pipe found for corner; Thence, continuing along

said westerly line, South 85 degrees 53 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 230.82

feet, to a point for corner; Thence, North 16 degrees 32 minutes 02 seconds West a

distance of 8.65 feet, to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.2183 acres of land.

Being that property, together with other land, described in that Lease Agreement, by and between Charles Land Company, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, as Lessor, and Hancock County, as Lessee, as described in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors for the June Term, 1989, as recorded in Book BB-41, Page 35; to which said lease was taken subject, that Warranty Deed to Mardi Gras Casino Corp., a Mississippi corporation, and predecessor in title to GLP Capital, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as recorded in Book BB-72, Page 568, in the office of the Chancery Clerk of Hancock County, Mississippi.

Excepting therefrom any property belonging to the State of Mississippi and identified as being “public trust tidelands” in that Boundary Agreement by and between Charles Land Company, Inc., and Secretary of State Dick Molpus, Trustee of the Public Trust Tidelands, as more particularly described and recorded in Book BB-44, Page 664, in the office of the Chancery Clerk of Hancock County, Mississippi.

ANNEX E

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY REMOVED FROM M RESORT SPA CASINO, HENDERSON, NEVADA

REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, COUNTY OF CLARK, STATE OF NEVADA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE NORTH HALF (N 1/₂) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/₄) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/₄) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/₄) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 SOUTH, RANGE 61 EAST, M.D.M.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE INTEREST IN AND TO THE WESTERLY 40.00 FEET AND THE NORTHERLY 40.00 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA TO PROVIDE FOR RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, UTILITIES AND OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1969 IN BOOK 980 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS DOCUMENT NO. 786740, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, OFFICIAL RECORDS.

penn_Ex31_1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Timothy J. Wilmott, certify that:

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penn National Gaming, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: November 4, 2016	/s/ Timothy J. Wilmott
	Timothy J. Wilmott
	Chief Executive Officer and President

penn_Ex31_2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Saul V. Reibstein, certify that:

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penn National Gaming, Inc.;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: November 4, 2016		/s/ Saul V. Reibstein
		Saul V. Reibstein
		Chief Financial Officer

penn_Ex32_1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Wilmott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

u
	/s/ Timothy J. Wilmott
	Timothy J. Wilmott
	Chief Executive Officer and President
	November 4, 2016

penn_Ex32_2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Saul V. Reibstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


	/s/ Saul V. Reibstein
	Saul V. Reibstein
	Chief Financial Officer
	November 4, 2016